Haven't I waited long enough? The role of wait times and subjective impairment in cannabis-related driving behavior

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104654
Ayelet Har-Even , Nehama Lewis , Hadar Eliash-Fizik , Sharon R. Sznitman
{"title":"Haven't I waited long enough? The role of wait times and subjective impairment in cannabis-related driving behavior","authors":"Ayelet Har-Even ,&nbsp;Nehama Lewis ,&nbsp;Hadar Eliash-Fizik ,&nbsp;Sharon R. Sznitman","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) poses a significant public health threat. This study explores DUIC through a multifaceted lens, examining correlates of various wait times between cannabis use and driving, subjective perceptions of impairment, and differences between medical and non-medical cannabis users.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Cross-sectional data from 979 cannabis users in Israel were collected through an online survey. DUIC risk was measured using reported wait times (categorized as low, moderate, and high risk) and driving while feeling cannabis effects. Logistic and multinomial regression identified correlates of DUIC risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>23 % of the respondents drove within two hours of use (high risk), 37 % waited 3 to 6 h (moderate risk), and 40 % waited over 7 h (low risk). Multinomial regression showed that being male (RRR = 2.11, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), having a medical cannabis license (RRR = 4.14, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), more frequent cannabis and alcohol co-use (RRR = 1.18, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and more frequent cannabis use (RRR = 1.21, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were associated with moderate risk compared to low risk. Being male (RRR = 1.89, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and reporting higher cannabis use frequency (RRR = 1.70, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) was associated with high DUIC risk. Cannabis use frequency was a significant predictor of subjective DUIC (AOR = 1.26, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings highlight the need for targeted prevention efforts, particularly for male and frequent cannabis users. The complex relationship between medical cannabis use and DUIC risk warrants further investigation to inform evidence-based policies and interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104654"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) poses a significant public health threat. This study explores DUIC through a multifaceted lens, examining correlates of various wait times between cannabis use and driving, subjective perceptions of impairment, and differences between medical and non-medical cannabis users.

Method

Cross-sectional data from 979 cannabis users in Israel were collected through an online survey. DUIC risk was measured using reported wait times (categorized as low, moderate, and high risk) and driving while feeling cannabis effects. Logistic and multinomial regression identified correlates of DUIC risk.

Results

23 % of the respondents drove within two hours of use (high risk), 37 % waited 3 to 6 h (moderate risk), and 40 % waited over 7 h (low risk). Multinomial regression showed that being male (RRR = 2.11, p < 0.001), having a medical cannabis license (RRR = 4.14, p < 0.01), more frequent cannabis and alcohol co-use (RRR = 1.18, p < 0.05), and more frequent cannabis use (RRR = 1.21, p < 0.001) were associated with moderate risk compared to low risk. Being male (RRR = 1.89, p < 0.01) and reporting higher cannabis use frequency (RRR = 1.70, p < 0.001) was associated with high DUIC risk. Cannabis use frequency was a significant predictor of subjective DUIC (AOR = 1.26, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Findings highlight the need for targeted prevention efforts, particularly for male and frequent cannabis users. The complex relationship between medical cannabis use and DUIC risk warrants further investigation to inform evidence-based policies and interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Prospective association of interventions for at-risk families with illicit drug use among young students in Taiwan The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth Haven't I waited long enough? The role of wait times and subjective impairment in cannabis-related driving behavior Growing practices and the use of potentially harmful chemical additives from a web survey of mainly small-scale cannabis growers in 18 countries. National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1