Antibiotics and indomethacin as perioperative management for cerclage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.036
Erica Delatorre , Henrique Provinciatto , Liliam Cristine Rolo , Edward Araujo Júnior
{"title":"Antibiotics and indomethacin as perioperative management for cerclage: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Erica Delatorre ,&nbsp;Henrique Provinciatto ,&nbsp;Liliam Cristine Rolo ,&nbsp;Edward Araujo Júnior","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Prematurity complications remain the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although cerclage shows promise in preventing preterm birth, it remains unclear whether perioperative management, such as the use of antibiotics or indomethacin, offers any additional benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Study Desing</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and random-effects <em>meta</em>-analysis comparing the use of indomethacin, antibiotics, and their combination as perioperative management for cerclage versus cerclage alone. Our research protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on June 9, 2024 (ID CRD42024552516).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our systematic review encompassed ten studies, and 838 pregnant women submitted to cerclage for prevention of preterm birth. We found no association between perioperative management and preterm birth before 28 weeks (RR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.76–1.39; p = 0.86), or perinatal mortality (RR 0.81; 95 % CI 0.54–1.22; p = 0.32).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Antibiotics, indomethacin, and their combination may have no additional benefit to cerclage in risk reduction of preterm birth or perinatal mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524006481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Prematurity complications remain the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although cerclage shows promise in preventing preterm birth, it remains unclear whether perioperative management, such as the use of antibiotics or indomethacin, offers any additional benefit.

Study Desing

We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis comparing the use of indomethacin, antibiotics, and their combination as perioperative management for cerclage versus cerclage alone. Our research protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on June 9, 2024 (ID CRD42024552516).

Results

Our systematic review encompassed ten studies, and 838 pregnant women submitted to cerclage for prevention of preterm birth. We found no association between perioperative management and preterm birth before 28 weeks (RR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.76–1.39; p = 0.86), or perinatal mortality (RR 0.81; 95 % CI 0.54–1.22; p = 0.32).

Conclusion

Antibiotics, indomethacin, and their combination may have no additional benefit to cerclage in risk reduction of preterm birth or perinatal mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素和吲哚美辛作为环扎术围手术期的治疗:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的早产并发症仍然是围产期发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管环扎术显示出预防早产的希望,但尚不清楚围手术期管理,如使用抗生素或吲哚美辛,是否能提供任何额外的好处。研究设计:我们进行了一项系统综述和随机效应荟萃分析,比较了吲哚美辛、抗生素及其联合应用作为环扎术围手术期治疗与单独环扎术的疗效。我们的研究方案已于2024年6月9日在国际前瞻性系统评论登记册(PROSPERO)上注册(ID CRD42024552516)。结果本系统综述纳入10项研究,838名孕妇接受环扎术预防早产。我们发现围手术期管理与28周前早产无关联(RR 1.03;95% ci 0.76-1.39;p = 0.86)或围产期死亡率(RR 0.81;95% ci 0.54-1.22;p = 0.32)。结论抗生素、吲哚美辛及其联用对环切术降低早产和围产期死亡风险无额外益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Home-telemonitoring of fetal and maternal condition in complicated pregnancies: Results from a real-world cohort to understand unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions The safety of vaginal delivery following obstetric anal sphincter injury- A retrospective pilot study using transperineal ultrasound algorithm Association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of cardiomyopathy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis Pretreatment decrease of the anti-müllerian hormone level does not translate into the proportionally lower efficiency of ovarian stimulation in patients with haematological malignancies A pre-post prospective study on the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) unit in the management of endometriosis pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1