Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems

Morgan D. Roche , Michele R. Crist , Cameron L. Aldridge , Helen R. Sofaer , Catherine S. Jarnevich , Julie A. Heinrichs
{"title":"Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems","authors":"Morgan D. Roche ,&nbsp;Michele R. Crist ,&nbsp;Cameron L. Aldridge ,&nbsp;Helen R. Sofaer ,&nbsp;Catherine S. Jarnevich ,&nbsp;Julie A. Heinrichs","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The extent of annual grass invasions in sagebrush ecosystems has required land managers to prioritize treatments in strategic locations to influence invasion outcomes. Maps of invasive annual grass cover show the extent and severity of the invasion, but they do not illustrate how invasive cover is changing over time.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The rate of change in invasive annual grass cover describes the trajectory of invasion. This information can be used to fine-tune priority locations and strategies for invasive species treatments.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We identified locations with positive, neutral, negative, and variable rates of change. Although rates of change have accelerated, there were many locations with a consistent neutral rate of change in cover. High positive rates of change frequently preceded high invasive annual grass cover, and locations that had low cover rarely had a history of high positive rates of change.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We identified potential management opportunities by combining rates of change in cover and percent cover data, illustrating both invasion severity and trajectory. We applied these potential opportunities to a map of the sagebrush biome using example thresholds. This map identifies locations that could be prioritized for different management goals and shows how those areas align with the Sagebrush Conservation Design management framework.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 6","pages":"Pages 183-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • The extent of annual grass invasions in sagebrush ecosystems has required land managers to prioritize treatments in strategic locations to influence invasion outcomes. Maps of invasive annual grass cover show the extent and severity of the invasion, but they do not illustrate how invasive cover is changing over time.
  • The rate of change in invasive annual grass cover describes the trajectory of invasion. This information can be used to fine-tune priority locations and strategies for invasive species treatments.
  • We identified locations with positive, neutral, negative, and variable rates of change. Although rates of change have accelerated, there were many locations with a consistent neutral rate of change in cover. High positive rates of change frequently preceded high invasive annual grass cover, and locations that had low cover rarely had a history of high positive rates of change.
  • We identified potential management opportunities by combining rates of change in cover and percent cover data, illustrating both invasion severity and trajectory. We applied these potential opportunities to a map of the sagebrush biome using example thresholds. This map identifies locations that could be prioritized for different management goals and shows how those areas align with the Sagebrush Conservation Design management framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Rangeland management practices in Somaliland: lessons learned from the Aroori Grazing Reserve Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1