The effects of institutional layering on electricity sector reform: Lessons from Norway's electricity sector

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103864
Minika Ekanem , Bram Noble , Greg Poelzer
{"title":"The effects of institutional layering on electricity sector reform: Lessons from Norway's electricity sector","authors":"Minika Ekanem ,&nbsp;Bram Noble ,&nbsp;Greg Poelzer","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Institutional layering is a dominant mode of change in shaping energy transitions, whereby new institutional rules or practices are added on top of or alongside existing ones. Characterized by the introduction of new actors, policies, and expanding energy arenas, energy transition processes can become progressively layered, resulting in institutional complexity and potentially undermining energy transition goals. This paper explores the impact of layering on actors and on the outcomes of energy transitions. A conceptual framework that integrates institutional change with a layering typology is developed and applied to Norway's electricity sector reform as a case study. Results show that Norway's energy landscape has become more diversified, leading to complex institutional arrangements, differential growth in the energy sector, and gaps between reform intentions versus outcomes. Whether layering produces the intended energy transition outcomes depends on the complexity of layering, the interaction, coordination, and alignment of the layered elements, and the vested interest of stakeholders. Insights from Norway's experience can guide institutional design to support the rapid expansion of renewable energy investments, or the reform or restructurings of existing energy institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103864"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutional layering is a dominant mode of change in shaping energy transitions, whereby new institutional rules or practices are added on top of or alongside existing ones. Characterized by the introduction of new actors, policies, and expanding energy arenas, energy transition processes can become progressively layered, resulting in institutional complexity and potentially undermining energy transition goals. This paper explores the impact of layering on actors and on the outcomes of energy transitions. A conceptual framework that integrates institutional change with a layering typology is developed and applied to Norway's electricity sector reform as a case study. Results show that Norway's energy landscape has become more diversified, leading to complex institutional arrangements, differential growth in the energy sector, and gaps between reform intentions versus outcomes. Whether layering produces the intended energy transition outcomes depends on the complexity of layering, the interaction, coordination, and alignment of the layered elements, and the vested interest of stakeholders. Insights from Norway's experience can guide institutional design to support the rapid expansion of renewable energy investments, or the reform or restructurings of existing energy institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度分层对电力部门改革的影响:来自挪威电力部门的经验教训
制度分层是形成能源转型的主要变化模式,即新的制度规则或实践被添加到现有规则或实践之上或旁边。能源转型的特点是引入新的参与者、政策和扩大能源领域,能源转型过程可以逐步分层,导致制度复杂性,并可能破坏能源转型目标。本文探讨了分层对行动者和能源转换结果的影响。将制度变革与分层类型学相结合的概念框架被开发出来,并作为案例研究应用于挪威的电力部门改革。结果表明,挪威的能源格局变得更加多样化,导致了复杂的制度安排,能源部门的差异增长,以及改革意图与结果之间的差距。分层是否产生预期的能源转换结果取决于分层的复杂性、分层元素的相互作用、协调和对齐,以及利益相关者的既得利益。挪威的经验可以指导制度设计,以支持可再生能源投资的快速扩张,或对现有能源机构进行改革或重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Desert or garden? Energy sacrifice zones, territorial affordances and competing visions for post-coal landscapes: The case of the Czechoslovak Army Mine Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom Institutional entrepreneuring for energy poverty: The role of boundary work in developing a collaborative product-service system for household appliances A technology to solve the water-energy-food crisis? Mapping sociotechnical configurations of agrivoltaics using Q-methodology Justice or just plans? Reviewing the energy transition strategy of Brazil's Ceará state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1