Henok Gashaw , Jamie Wubben , Carlos T. Calafate , Fabrizio Granelli
{"title":"Impact of urban environments on FANET communication: A comparative study of propagation models","authors":"Henok Gashaw , Jamie Wubben , Carlos T. Calafate , Fabrizio Granelli","doi":"10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The steady rise in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is leading to the development of an ever-growing number of applications. In urban settings, efforts like the U-Space initiative in Europe are striving to standardize and regulate the operations of UAVs. To support these applications and further UAV research, it is essential to thoroughly understand UAV communication, both among and between UAVs. Nonetheless, we have identified a lack of studies on communication models, especially in urban areas where obstacles like tall buildings can disrupt communication. This study offers a comprehensive review of current measurement campaigns on channel models for aerial communication. In addition, we conducted experiments on (i) the separation distance between two UAVs, (ii) Multi-UAV communication and (iii) Multi-UAV to ground communication using three different city profiles in Spain (Valencia, Barcelona, and Madrid). To accomplish this, we utilized an advanced co-simulation framework that accurately models both UAV mobility (Ardusim) and communication (OMNeT++). Our results regarding UAV-to-UAV communication in a city environment indicate that: (i) the communication range, in our specific experiments, is limited to around 400 meters. Afterward, the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) declines significantly. (ii) Different communication models yield similar results. (iii) UAV-to-UAV communication becomes feasible at higher altitudes (e.g., 120 m), particularly in the presence of tall buildings. With respect to the Multi-UAV to ground communications, we can conclude that again, the altitude of the UAVs is paramount. Furthermore, increasing the number of UAVs providing service to the ground does increase the PDR, but only ever so slightly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55555,"journal":{"name":"Ad Hoc Networks","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 103695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ad Hoc Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870524003068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The steady rise in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is leading to the development of an ever-growing number of applications. In urban settings, efforts like the U-Space initiative in Europe are striving to standardize and regulate the operations of UAVs. To support these applications and further UAV research, it is essential to thoroughly understand UAV communication, both among and between UAVs. Nonetheless, we have identified a lack of studies on communication models, especially in urban areas where obstacles like tall buildings can disrupt communication. This study offers a comprehensive review of current measurement campaigns on channel models for aerial communication. In addition, we conducted experiments on (i) the separation distance between two UAVs, (ii) Multi-UAV communication and (iii) Multi-UAV to ground communication using three different city profiles in Spain (Valencia, Barcelona, and Madrid). To accomplish this, we utilized an advanced co-simulation framework that accurately models both UAV mobility (Ardusim) and communication (OMNeT++). Our results regarding UAV-to-UAV communication in a city environment indicate that: (i) the communication range, in our specific experiments, is limited to around 400 meters. Afterward, the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) declines significantly. (ii) Different communication models yield similar results. (iii) UAV-to-UAV communication becomes feasible at higher altitudes (e.g., 120 m), particularly in the presence of tall buildings. With respect to the Multi-UAV to ground communications, we can conclude that again, the altitude of the UAVs is paramount. Furthermore, increasing the number of UAVs providing service to the ground does increase the PDR, but only ever so slightly.
期刊介绍:
The Ad Hoc Networks is an international and archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in ad hoc and sensor networking areas. The Ad Hoc Networks considers original, high quality and unpublished contributions addressing all aspects of ad hoc and sensor networks. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
Mobile and Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
Sensor Networks
Wireless Local and Personal Area Networks
Home Networks
Ad Hoc Networks of Autonomous Intelligent Systems
Novel Architectures for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
Self-organizing Network Architectures and Protocols
Transport Layer Protocols
Routing protocols (unicast, multicast, geocast, etc.)
Media Access Control Techniques
Error Control Schemes
Power-Aware, Low-Power and Energy-Efficient Designs
Synchronization and Scheduling Issues
Mobility Management
Mobility-Tolerant Communication Protocols
Location Tracking and Location-based Services
Resource and Information Management
Security and Fault-Tolerance Issues
Hardware and Software Platforms, Systems, and Testbeds
Experimental and Prototype Results
Quality-of-Service Issues
Cross-Layer Interactions
Scalability Issues
Performance Analysis and Simulation of Protocols.