Prediction of overnight stay following shoulder arthroplasty utilizing machine learning

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.010
Benjamin Miltenberg MD , Teja Yeramosu MD , William L. Johns MD , Gabriel Onor MD , Brandon Martinazzi MD , Michael Chang MD , Surena Namdari MD
{"title":"Prediction of overnight stay following shoulder arthroplasty utilizing machine learning","authors":"Benjamin Miltenberg MD ,&nbsp;Teja Yeramosu MD ,&nbsp;William L. Johns MD ,&nbsp;Gabriel Onor MD ,&nbsp;Brandon Martinazzi MD ,&nbsp;Michael Chang MD ,&nbsp;Surena Namdari MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has evolved from requiring extended inpatient hospital stays to favoring same-day discharges, influenced by improved surgical techniques, patient optimization, and the risks associated with inpatient stays. The removal of TSA from Medicare's inpatient-only list in 2021 underscores this shift. However, the need for accurate prediction of post-TSA admission remains, as hospital admissions are costly and linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Machine learning algorithms offer potential advantages over traditional predictive models by identifying complex, nonlinear relationships. This study aimed to demonstrate and compare the performance of commonly used machine learning algorithms to predict overnight hospital stay (OHS) admission.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used data from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program 2021 database to analyze patients who underwent primary, elective TSA. Patients were divided into short hospital stay of 0-1 days and OHS of &gt;1 day cohorts. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Gradient Boosted Tree, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine, were trained and validated to predict OHS. The models' predictive capacities were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, calibration, and decision curve analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 5811 patients analyzed, 926 (15.9%) were discharged on the same day. The ANN model demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.811), indicating superior predictive ability. Important variables influencing OHS predictions included operative time, body mass index, functional status, and patient demographics, such as age, race, and home support. Machine learning models showed better predictive performance than multivariate logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Machine learning models, particularly the ANN model, outperform traditional regression methods in predicting post-TSA admission, highlighting their utility in optimizing patient selection for outpatient surgery. These models identify important variables associated with increased risk of OHS, aiding in preoperative planning and patient counseling. Integrating machine learning into clinical practice may enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction while reducing health-care costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 943-952"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has evolved from requiring extended inpatient hospital stays to favoring same-day discharges, influenced by improved surgical techniques, patient optimization, and the risks associated with inpatient stays. The removal of TSA from Medicare's inpatient-only list in 2021 underscores this shift. However, the need for accurate prediction of post-TSA admission remains, as hospital admissions are costly and linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Machine learning algorithms offer potential advantages over traditional predictive models by identifying complex, nonlinear relationships. This study aimed to demonstrate and compare the performance of commonly used machine learning algorithms to predict overnight hospital stay (OHS) admission.

Methods

This study used data from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program 2021 database to analyze patients who underwent primary, elective TSA. Patients were divided into short hospital stay of 0-1 days and OHS of >1 day cohorts. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Gradient Boosted Tree, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine, were trained and validated to predict OHS. The models' predictive capacities were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

Results

Out of 5811 patients analyzed, 926 (15.9%) were discharged on the same day. The ANN model demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.811), indicating superior predictive ability. Important variables influencing OHS predictions included operative time, body mass index, functional status, and patient demographics, such as age, race, and home support. Machine learning models showed better predictive performance than multivariate logistic regression.

Conclusion

Machine learning models, particularly the ANN model, outperform traditional regression methods in predicting post-TSA admission, highlighting their utility in optimizing patient selection for outpatient surgery. These models identify important variables associated with increased risk of OHS, aiding in preoperative planning and patient counseling. Integrating machine learning into clinical practice may enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction while reducing health-care costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习预测肩关节置换术后的过夜时间
背景:全肩关节置换术(TSA)已经从需要延长住院时间演变为倾向于当天出院,这是受手术技术改进、患者优化和住院风险的影响。2021年,TSA从医疗保险的住院病人名单中删除,凸显了这一转变。然而,由于住院费用昂贵且与发病率和死亡率增加有关,因此仍然需要准确预测tsa后入院情况。通过识别复杂的非线性关系,机器学习算法比传统的预测模型具有潜在的优势。本研究旨在展示和比较常用的机器学习算法在预测过夜住院(OHS)住院方面的性能。方法:本研究使用来自美国外科医师学会国家质量改进计划2021数据库的数据来分析接受原发性选择性TSA的患者。患者分为短住院0 ~ 1天组和OHS 1天组。对随机森林、人工神经网络、梯度增强树、Naïve贝叶斯和支持向量机等机器学习模型进行了训练和验证,以预测OHS。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积、校准和决策曲线分析比较模型的预测能力。结果5811例患者中,926例(15.9%)同日出院。人工神经网络模型在受者工作特征曲线下的面积最大(0.811),具有较好的预测能力。影响OHS预测的重要变量包括手术时间、体重指数、功能状态和患者人口统计数据,如年龄、种族和家庭支持。机器学习模型的预测性能优于多元逻辑回归。结论机器学习模型,特别是人工神经网络模型,在预测tsa后入院方面优于传统的回归方法,突出了它们在优化门诊手术患者选择方面的实用性。这些模型确定了与OHS风险增加相关的重要变量,有助于术前规划和患者咨询。将机器学习整合到临床实践中可以提高手术效果和患者满意度,同时降低医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
The effect of perioperative diuretic use on complications after total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity-matched cohort analysis Digital technology in shoulder arthroplasty: what do surgeons want? What will industry offer? Perceived influence of preoperative information in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients Discrepancies in relative value unit-based reimbursement for operative management of periprosthetic humerus fractures Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with adverse medical, but not implant-related complications following total shoulder arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1