Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources
Shuai Wang , Shujing Qin , Lei Cheng, Kaijie Zou, Chenhao Fu, Pan Liu, Lu Zhang
{"title":"Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources","authors":"Shuai Wang , Shujing Qin , Lei Cheng, Kaijie Zou, Chenhao Fu, Pan Liu, Lu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Empirical models for estimating ecosystem respiration (ER) are widely used in CO<sub>2</sub> flux partitioning algorithms that partition net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ER due to advantages of simple structures. However, empirical ER models remain limited due to single-source conceptualization that doesn’t discriminate different responses of aboveground respiration (AGR) and belowground respiration (BGR) to environmental factors (i.e., temperature and/or soil moisture). In this study, a dual-source module with only one parameter <em>α</em> was proposed and incorporated into six widely used ER models to enhance model capabilities. Long-term flux measurements of six typical terrestrial ecosystems and soil chamber respiration data at two sites were collected to evaluate models. Results showed that integration of the dual-source module can significantly improve the performance of empirical models in selected ecosystems with mean <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> improvement of 0.10 ± 0.16. The site years with relative increased <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> (Δ<em>R<sup>2</sup></em>) larger than 10 % range from 6 % to 79 % amongst different models. Further validation between soil respiration and estimated BGR showed good correlations (<em>r</em> > 0.7) and demonstrated that proposed method can provide robust estimate of above/belowground respiration. Calibrated <em>α</em> varies amongst ecosystem types. Further analysis indicates variation of <em>α</em> is largely influenced by ratio of above/belowground biomass and annual average moisture conditions. Our findings highlight the critical need for partitioning ER models into dual-source for developing CO<sub>2</sub> flux partitioning algorithms and support the approach as an effective means to enhance the understanding of global carbon cycles with changing climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112855"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Empirical models for estimating ecosystem respiration (ER) are widely used in CO2 flux partitioning algorithms that partition net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ER due to advantages of simple structures. However, empirical ER models remain limited due to single-source conceptualization that doesn’t discriminate different responses of aboveground respiration (AGR) and belowground respiration (BGR) to environmental factors (i.e., temperature and/or soil moisture). In this study, a dual-source module with only one parameter α was proposed and incorporated into six widely used ER models to enhance model capabilities. Long-term flux measurements of six typical terrestrial ecosystems and soil chamber respiration data at two sites were collected to evaluate models. Results showed that integration of the dual-source module can significantly improve the performance of empirical models in selected ecosystems with mean R2 improvement of 0.10 ± 0.16. The site years with relative increased R2 (ΔR2) larger than 10 % range from 6 % to 79 % amongst different models. Further validation between soil respiration and estimated BGR showed good correlations (r > 0.7) and demonstrated that proposed method can provide robust estimate of above/belowground respiration. Calibrated α varies amongst ecosystem types. Further analysis indicates variation of α is largely influenced by ratio of above/belowground biomass and annual average moisture conditions. Our findings highlight the critical need for partitioning ER models into dual-source for developing CO2 flux partitioning algorithms and support the approach as an effective means to enhance the understanding of global carbon cycles with changing climate.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.