The paradox of dual orientation in human resource practices and its cross-level effect on innovation

IF 10.5 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115090

Fawad Ahmed , Fuqiang Zhao , Helen Uma Stra

{"title":"The paradox of dual orientation in human resource practices and its cross-level effect on innovation","authors":"Fawad Ahmed , Fuqiang Zhao , Helen Uma Stra","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper leverages paradoxical theorizing to develop the scale for Ambidextrous Human Resource Practices (AHRP) and contributes to the literature on emerging economies by providing a guide for managers on best practices for implementing ambidexterity within HR. A mixed −methods approach was used. Study 1 generated the item pool for the AHRP scale with the help of extant literature and in-depth interviews conducted with 37 managers from five large Chinese firms, including two Fortune 500 companies. The items generated in Study 1 were tested for validation through a second study with a sample of 216 employees. Study 3 employed multilevel structural equation modeling on data from 257 employees across 64 teams from 31 firms. The AHRP construct was developed with two dimensions: commitment-oriented HR practices (HRP-CM) and cooperation-oriented HR practices (HRP-CO). Analysis of multisource data indicates that AHRPs at the firm level had a strong positive relationship with innovation performance at the team level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 115090"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper leverages paradoxical theorizing to develop the scale for Ambidextrous Human Resource Practices (AHRP) and contributes to the literature on emerging economies by providing a guide for managers on best practices for implementing ambidexterity within HR. A mixed −methods approach was used. Study 1 generated the item pool for the AHRP scale with the help of extant literature and in-depth interviews conducted with 37 managers from five large Chinese firms, including two Fortune 500 companies. The items generated in Study 1 were tested for validation through a second study with a sample of 216 employees. Study 3 employed multilevel structural equation modeling on data from 257 employees across 64 teams from 31 firms. The AHRP construct was developed with two dimensions: commitment-oriented HR practices (HRP-CM) and cooperation-oriented HR practices (HRP-CO). Analysis of multisource data indicates that AHRPs at the firm level had a strong positive relationship with innovation performance at the team level.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

人力资源实践中的双重导向悖论及其对创新的跨层次影响

本文利用矛盾理论来开发双灵巧人力资源实践（AHRP）的规模，并通过为管理者提供在人力资源中实施双灵巧的最佳实践指南，为新兴经济体的文献做出贡献。采用混合方法。研究1利用现有文献和对中国五家大型企业（包括两家财富500强企业）的37名管理者的深度访谈，生成了AHRP量表的项目库。在研究1中产生的项目通过第二项研究与216名员工的样本进行验证。研究3采用多层结构方程模型对来自31家公司64个团队的257名员工的数据进行分析。AHRP结构包括两个维度：承诺导向的人力资源实践（HR - cm）和合作导向的人力资源实践（HR - co）。多源数据分析表明，企业层面的ahrp与团队层面的创新绩效存在显著的正相关关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Business Research BUSINESS-

CiteScore

20.30

自引率

10.60%

发文量

956

期刊介绍： The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.