Non-linearity and Temporal Variability Are Overlooked Components of Global Vertebrate Population Dynamics

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Diversity and Distributions Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/ddi.13932
Maelys Boennec, Vasilis Dakos, Vincent Devictor
{"title":"Non-linearity and Temporal Variability Are Overlooked Components of Global Vertebrate Population Dynamics","authors":"Maelys Boennec,&nbsp;Vasilis Dakos,&nbsp;Vincent Devictor","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Population dynamics are usually assessed through linear trend analysis, quantifying their general direction. However, linear trends may hide substantial variations in population dynamics that could reconcile apparent discrepancies when quantifying the extent of the biodiversity crisis. We seek to determine whether the use of non-linear methods and the quantification of temporal variability can offer a more complete representation of changes in global population dynamics than commonly-used linear approaches.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed 6437 population time series from 1257 vertebrate species from the Living Planet Database over the period 1950–2020. We modelled populations through the use of second-order polynomials and classified trajectories according to their direction and acceleration. We modelled and classified these same populations using a more classical linear trend analysis. We quantified temporal variability using the mean squared error of the fitted polynomials. We then used generalised linear mixed models to test potential sources of heterogeneity in non-linear trajectories and temporal variability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In all, 44.8% of the analysed population time series were non-linear. Across all populations, 30% were declining, 30% were increasing, and 40% were with no linear trend. Among the population showing no linear trend, half were concave or convex. Non-linearity was expressed differently between taxonomic groups, with mammals showing higher prevalence of non-linearity. Marine and freshwater populations were more variable than terrestrial populations, and fish were more variable than other vertebrates. Differences between geographical regions were detected in both non-linearity and temporal variability, but no straightforward pattern emerged. There were no differences in both components between IUCN categories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Non-linearity and temporal variability reveal usually overlooked dramatic declines or recovery signals in global population dynamics. Thus, moving beyond linearity can improve our understanding of complex population dynamics and better inform conservation decisions. In particular, populations usually classified as ‘stable’ can hide informative changes in non-linear and variability patterns that need to be considered in global biodiversity assessments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"30 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13932","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Population dynamics are usually assessed through linear trend analysis, quantifying their general direction. However, linear trends may hide substantial variations in population dynamics that could reconcile apparent discrepancies when quantifying the extent of the biodiversity crisis. We seek to determine whether the use of non-linear methods and the quantification of temporal variability can offer a more complete representation of changes in global population dynamics than commonly-used linear approaches.

Methods

We analysed 6437 population time series from 1257 vertebrate species from the Living Planet Database over the period 1950–2020. We modelled populations through the use of second-order polynomials and classified trajectories according to their direction and acceleration. We modelled and classified these same populations using a more classical linear trend analysis. We quantified temporal variability using the mean squared error of the fitted polynomials. We then used generalised linear mixed models to test potential sources of heterogeneity in non-linear trajectories and temporal variability.

Results

In all, 44.8% of the analysed population time series were non-linear. Across all populations, 30% were declining, 30% were increasing, and 40% were with no linear trend. Among the population showing no linear trend, half were concave or convex. Non-linearity was expressed differently between taxonomic groups, with mammals showing higher prevalence of non-linearity. Marine and freshwater populations were more variable than terrestrial populations, and fish were more variable than other vertebrates. Differences between geographical regions were detected in both non-linearity and temporal variability, but no straightforward pattern emerged. There were no differences in both components between IUCN categories.

Main Conclusions

Non-linearity and temporal variability reveal usually overlooked dramatic declines or recovery signals in global population dynamics. Thus, moving beyond linearity can improve our understanding of complex population dynamics and better inform conservation decisions. In particular, populations usually classified as ‘stable’ can hide informative changes in non-linear and variability patterns that need to be considered in global biodiversity assessments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非线性和时间变异性是全球脊椎动物种群动态中被忽视的组成部分
目的种群动态通常通过线性趋势分析来评估,量化它们的总体方向。然而,线性趋势可能隐藏了种群动态的实质性变化,这些变化可以在量化生物多样性危机程度时调和明显的差异。我们试图确定使用非线性方法和时间变异性的量化是否可以比常用的线性方法更完整地表示全球人口动态的变化。方法分析了1950-2020年地球生命数据库中1257种脊椎动物的6437个种群时间序列。我们通过使用二阶多项式对种群进行建模,并根据它们的方向和加速度对轨迹进行分类。我们使用更经典的线性趋势分析对这些相同的种群进行建模和分类。我们使用拟合多项式的均方误差量化了时间变异性。然后,我们使用广义线性混合模型来测试非线性轨迹和时间变异性的潜在异质性来源。结果44.8%的人口时间序列是非线性的。在所有人群中,30%呈下降趋势,30%呈上升趋势,40%呈无线性趋势。在没有线性趋势的人群中,有一半是凹形或凸形的。非线性在不同分类类群间的表达不同,哺乳动物的非线性发生率更高。海洋和淡水种群比陆地种群变化更大,鱼类比其他脊椎动物变化更大。不同地理区域之间的非线性和时间变异均存在差异,但没有直接的模式出现。在IUCN的分类中,这两个成分没有差异。非线性和时间变异性揭示了全球人口动态中通常被忽视的急剧下降或恢复信号。因此,超越线性可以提高我们对复杂种群动态的理解,并更好地为保护决策提供信息。特别是,通常被归类为“稳定”的种群可以隐藏在全球生物多样性评估中需要考虑的非线性和变异性模式中的信息变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover page Contrasting Patterns of Population Genomic Structure Between Broadcast-Spawning and Brooding Corals in Southeast Asia Issue Information Non-Native, Non-Naturalised Plants Suffer Less Herbivory Than Native Plants Across European Botanical Gardens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1