Guler Aslan-Sungur (Rojda), Nic Boersma, Caitlin E. Moore, Emily Heaton, Carl J. Bernacchi, Andy Vanloocke
{"title":"Advances in Miscanthus × Giganteus Planting Techniques May Increase Carbon Uptake in the Establishment Year","authors":"Guler Aslan-Sungur (Rojda), Nic Boersma, Caitlin E. Moore, Emily Heaton, Carl J. Bernacchi, Andy Vanloocke","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agricultural lands hold significant potential for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration, particularly when utilizing biomass crops and agricultural residues. Among these, Miscanthus × giganteus (<i>mxg</i>) stands out due to its high productivity and carbon sequestration capabilities. Recognizing the importance of such biomass crops, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) as a crucial strategy for achieving net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 2050. This study examines the carbon uptake potential of <i>mxg</i> during its establishment year at the Sustainable Advanced Bioeconomy Research (SABR) farm in Iowa, USA, where <i>mxg</i> was planted at a density exceeding previous studies. Using eddy covariance (EC) measurements, we quantified the net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE), and derived gross primary productivity (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (<i>R</i><sub>eco</sub>). Our findings reveal that SABR's <i>mxg</i> exhibited a significant carbon uptake of −621 g C m<sup>−2</sup>, a threefold increase compared to a similar EC site in the “corn-belt” (University of Illinois Energy Research Farm; UIEF), which was established with lower planting density and pre-commercial planting equipment. Favorable growing conditions and advanced planting technologies at SABR likely contributed to this high carbon uptake. Comparisons with other global EC studies indicated a strong correlation between higher planting densities and greater carbon uptake. These results suggest that increasing <i>mxg</i> planting density can enhance carbon uptake, but further studies are necessary to evaluate the impacts under varying environmental conditions and management practices. Additionally, economic analyses are essential to determine the viability of higher planting densities. Our study underscores the potential of optimized <i>mxg</i> management practices to contribute significantly to CO<sub>2</sub> uptake and supports the development of BECCS as a viable climate change mitigation strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Agricultural lands hold significant potential for CO2 sequestration, particularly when utilizing biomass crops and agricultural residues. Among these, Miscanthus × giganteus (mxg) stands out due to its high productivity and carbon sequestration capabilities. Recognizing the importance of such biomass crops, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) as a crucial strategy for achieving net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050. This study examines the carbon uptake potential of mxg during its establishment year at the Sustainable Advanced Bioeconomy Research (SABR) farm in Iowa, USA, where mxg was planted at a density exceeding previous studies. Using eddy covariance (EC) measurements, we quantified the net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE), and derived gross primary productivity (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (Reco). Our findings reveal that SABR's mxg exhibited a significant carbon uptake of −621 g C m−2, a threefold increase compared to a similar EC site in the “corn-belt” (University of Illinois Energy Research Farm; UIEF), which was established with lower planting density and pre-commercial planting equipment. Favorable growing conditions and advanced planting technologies at SABR likely contributed to this high carbon uptake. Comparisons with other global EC studies indicated a strong correlation between higher planting densities and greater carbon uptake. These results suggest that increasing mxg planting density can enhance carbon uptake, but further studies are necessary to evaluate the impacts under varying environmental conditions and management practices. Additionally, economic analyses are essential to determine the viability of higher planting densities. Our study underscores the potential of optimized mxg management practices to contribute significantly to CO2 uptake and supports the development of BECCS as a viable climate change mitigation strategy.
农业用地具有封存二氧化碳的巨大潜力,特别是在利用生物质作物和农业残留物时。其中,芒草(Miscanthus × giganteus, mxg)因其高产和固碳能力而脱颖而出。认识到这类生物质作物的重要性,政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)已将生物能源与碳捕获与封存(BECCS)确定为到2050年实现二氧化碳净零排放的关键战略。本研究在美国爱荷华州可持续先进生物经济研究(SABR)农场考察了mxg在其建立年度的碳吸收潜力,该农场以超过以往研究的密度种植mxg。利用涡动相关(EC)测量,我们量化了净生态系统碳交换(NEE),并推导了总初级生产力(GPP)和生态系统呼吸(Reco)。我们的研究结果表明,SABR的mxg表现出显著的碳吸收- 621 g cm - 2,与“玉米带”的类似EC站点相比增加了三倍(伊利诺伊大学能源研究农场;UIEF),以较低的种植密度和商业化前的种植设备建立。SABR有利的生长条件和先进的种植技术可能促成了这种高碳吸收。与其他全球EC研究的比较表明,较高的种植密度与较高的碳吸收量之间存在很强的相关性。这些结果表明,增加种植密度可以促进碳吸收,但需要进一步研究在不同环境条件和管理措施下的影响。此外,经济分析对于确定较高种植密度的可行性至关重要。我们的研究强调了优化的温室气体管理实践在显著促进二氧化碳吸收方面的潜力,并支持将BECCS发展为一项可行的气候变化缓解战略。
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.