Staff Perceptions of Compassionate Care Visits for Nursing Home Residents During Restricted Visitation

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1155/jonm/4128918
Melissa McClean, Kalei Kowalchik, Jacqueline Mogle, Liza Behrens, Joan G. Carpenter
{"title":"Staff Perceptions of Compassionate Care Visits for Nursing Home Residents During Restricted Visitation","authors":"Melissa McClean,&nbsp;Kalei Kowalchik,&nbsp;Jacqueline Mogle,&nbsp;Liza Behrens,&nbsp;Joan G. Carpenter","doi":"10.1155/jonm/4128918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To describe compassionate care (CC) visits during visitation restrictions from the perspective of nursing home (NH) staff.</p>\n <p><b>Background:</b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, guidance was implemented to restrict visitation in NH communities to protect both residents and staff from risk of infectious outbreak. As a result, many NHs instituted “CC visits” to allow visitation for vulnerable residents. However, it is unclear how CC visits were defined, operationalized, and how their associated benefits and risks were perceived by staff.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted an exploratory qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews and analyzed data using directed content analysis among NH direct care staff.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> From June 2021 through March 2022, we recruited nursing, social work, and activities NH staff participants (<i>N</i> = 24). Most were female (88%), White (79%), and had more than 3 years of experience working in NHs (79%). We found three main thematic categories and associated subthemes: (1) <i>Appropriate Use of CC Visits</i> (visits for residents experiencing imminent death, to support resident’s psychosocial needs, and for family members exhibiting concern for the resident); (2) <i>Benefits of CC Visits</i> (resident and staff physical and psychosocial benefits); and (3) <i>Risks of CC Visits</i> (resident and staff risks of facilitating visits and contracting illness). In this study, benefits of CC visits outweighed risks.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> In this study, we describe how NH staff describe CC visits, their use during the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated risks and benefits. This includes when visitation could be provided to residents and the impact it had on the resident’s well-being.</p>\n <p><b>Implications:</b> This study highlights the need to consider the physical and psychosocial consequences of social isolation of NH residents.</p>\n <p><b>Impact:</b> Study findings can be used to provide guidance in future public health emergencies when visitation restrictions are instituted.</p>\n <p><b>Reporting Method:</b> We have adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines.</p>\n <p><b>Patient or Public Contribution:</b> Direct care NH staff including social workers (SWs), nursing staff, and activity directors between the ages of 18 and 89 years old were English speaking and willing to participate in a semistructured interview outside of work hours participated in this research. Potential participants contacted members of the study team by phone or email to express their interest in study participation. After confirming eligibility and willingness to participate, an email link was sent to participants with the electronic information/consent sheet using the Qualtrics web-based survey platform (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah). Once participants consented to participate, they were directed to an electronic demographic questionnaire and risk perception survey. At the end of the risk perception survey, participants could indicate if they were willing to be contacted for a semistructured interview to discuss restricted social activities and visitation mandates in NHs. Interviews were scheduled via Zoom video conference during a time outside of work hours. Following participant verbal consent, interviews were audio-recorded. Participants were given a $30 electronic gift card.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/4128918","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/4128918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To describe compassionate care (CC) visits during visitation restrictions from the perspective of nursing home (NH) staff.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, guidance was implemented to restrict visitation in NH communities to protect both residents and staff from risk of infectious outbreak. As a result, many NHs instituted “CC visits” to allow visitation for vulnerable residents. However, it is unclear how CC visits were defined, operationalized, and how their associated benefits and risks were perceived by staff.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews and analyzed data using directed content analysis among NH direct care staff.

Results: From June 2021 through March 2022, we recruited nursing, social work, and activities NH staff participants (N = 24). Most were female (88%), White (79%), and had more than 3 years of experience working in NHs (79%). We found three main thematic categories and associated subthemes: (1) Appropriate Use of CC Visits (visits for residents experiencing imminent death, to support resident’s psychosocial needs, and for family members exhibiting concern for the resident); (2) Benefits of CC Visits (resident and staff physical and psychosocial benefits); and (3) Risks of CC Visits (resident and staff risks of facilitating visits and contracting illness). In this study, benefits of CC visits outweighed risks.

Conclusions: In this study, we describe how NH staff describe CC visits, their use during the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated risks and benefits. This includes when visitation could be provided to residents and the impact it had on the resident’s well-being.

Implications: This study highlights the need to consider the physical and psychosocial consequences of social isolation of NH residents.

Impact: Study findings can be used to provide guidance in future public health emergencies when visitation restrictions are instituted.

Reporting Method: We have adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution: Direct care NH staff including social workers (SWs), nursing staff, and activity directors between the ages of 18 and 89 years old were English speaking and willing to participate in a semistructured interview outside of work hours participated in this research. Potential participants contacted members of the study team by phone or email to express their interest in study participation. After confirming eligibility and willingness to participate, an email link was sent to participants with the electronic information/consent sheet using the Qualtrics web-based survey platform (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah). Once participants consented to participate, they were directed to an electronic demographic questionnaire and risk perception survey. At the end of the risk perception survey, participants could indicate if they were willing to be contacted for a semistructured interview to discuss restricted social activities and visitation mandates in NHs. Interviews were scheduled via Zoom video conference during a time outside of work hours. Following participant verbal consent, interviews were audio-recorded. Participants were given a $30 electronic gift card.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Staff Perceptions of Compassionate Care Visits for Nursing Home Residents During Restricted Visitation Chinese Version of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale for Clinical Nurses: A Translation and Psychometric Validation Study Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review Challenges in Clinical Training for Nursing Students during COVID-19: Examining Its Effects on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction A Concept Analysis of Change Fatigue Among Nurses Based on Walker and Avant’s Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1