Concentrations and inter-element correlations of seven essential elements in wild plants of Japan

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecological Research Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1111/1440-1703.12533
Takafumi Mizuno, Daichi Kondo, Hiroto Kasai, Kosuke Kuwabara, Jun Yamashita, Yoshinori Murai, Antony van der Ent, Atsushi Hashimoto, Toshihiro Watanabe
{"title":"Concentrations and inter-element correlations of seven essential elements in wild plants of Japan","authors":"Takafumi Mizuno,&nbsp;Daichi Kondo,&nbsp;Hiroto Kasai,&nbsp;Kosuke Kuwabara,&nbsp;Jun Yamashita,&nbsp;Yoshinori Murai,&nbsp;Antony van der Ent,&nbsp;Atsushi Hashimoto,&nbsp;Toshihiro Watanabe","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.12533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We assessed the effects of soil type on the concentrations of seven elements (calcium, potassium, sulfur, phosphorus, iron, manganese, zinc) in plants using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis and plant specimens collected from calcareous and ultramafic soil areas, and ‘general soils’ (other types of soil represented by Brown Forest soils and Andosols) of Japan. Compared with the plants from other types of soils, the means of these seven elements were lower in plants originating from ultramafic soils, especially in phosphorus. Plants from calcareous soil areas had high iron and zinc concentrations on average, but this tendency was biased by plants collected on Mt. Fujiwara, which had extremely high average values of these elements. Calcium concentration in plants had a negative correlation with zinc or iron from calcareous or general soils, respectively, and iron showed positive correlations with zinc, manganese, and sulfur in plants from calcareous, ultramafic, and general soils, respectively. These correlations were not found in plants from general soils, suggesting that these relationships reflect the chemical characteristics of soil types. On the contrary, plants from all soil types showed a positive correlation between sulfur and phosphorus, whereas a positive correlation between potassium and phosphorus was found in plants from calcareous and general soils, but not in ultramafic plants, which instead showed a weak, but statistically significant correlation between potassium and sulfur. Statistically, iron and sulfur concentrations were positively correlated in all soil types, but manganese showed a low correlation with the other elements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"39 6","pages":"941-956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.12533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assessed the effects of soil type on the concentrations of seven elements (calcium, potassium, sulfur, phosphorus, iron, manganese, zinc) in plants using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis and plant specimens collected from calcareous and ultramafic soil areas, and ‘general soils’ (other types of soil represented by Brown Forest soils and Andosols) of Japan. Compared with the plants from other types of soils, the means of these seven elements were lower in plants originating from ultramafic soils, especially in phosphorus. Plants from calcareous soil areas had high iron and zinc concentrations on average, but this tendency was biased by plants collected on Mt. Fujiwara, which had extremely high average values of these elements. Calcium concentration in plants had a negative correlation with zinc or iron from calcareous or general soils, respectively, and iron showed positive correlations with zinc, manganese, and sulfur in plants from calcareous, ultramafic, and general soils, respectively. These correlations were not found in plants from general soils, suggesting that these relationships reflect the chemical characteristics of soil types. On the contrary, plants from all soil types showed a positive correlation between sulfur and phosphorus, whereas a positive correlation between potassium and phosphorus was found in plants from calcareous and general soils, but not in ultramafic plants, which instead showed a weak, but statistically significant correlation between potassium and sulfur. Statistically, iron and sulfur concentrations were positively correlated in all soil types, but manganese showed a low correlation with the other elements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本野生植物中7种必需元素的含量及其元素间相关性
我们利用x射线荧光(XRF)分析和从日本钙质和超镁铁质土壤地区以及“一般土壤”(以棕色森林土壤和安土为代表的其他类型土壤)收集的植物标本,评估了土壤类型对植物中七种元素(钙、钾、硫、磷、铁、锰、锌)浓度的影响。与其他土壤类型的植物相比,来自超镁质土壤的植物这7种元素的平均值较低,尤其是磷。钙质土壤地区的植物铁和锌的平均含量较高,但藤原山的植物铁和锌的平均含量极高,这一趋势有所偏倚。钙质、超镁质、普通土壤中植物钙浓度与锌、铁呈负相关,铁浓度与锌、锰、硫呈正相关。这些相关性在一般土壤的植物中没有发现,表明这些关系反映了土壤类型的化学特征。相反,所有土壤类型植物的硫与磷呈正相关,而钾与磷在钙质和普通土壤中呈正相关,而在超镁铁质植物中不呈正相关,而钾与硫呈弱相关性,但具有统计学意义。在统计上,铁和硫在所有土壤类型中均呈显著正相关,而锰与其他元素的相关性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acknowledgments to reviewers Copper, lead, and zinc tolerance and accumulation in the Australian rattle pods Crotalaria novae-hollandiae, C. medicaginea, and C. mitchellii Transfer of potentially toxic metals and metalloids from terrestrial plants to arthropods—A mini review Concentrations and inter-element correlations of seven essential elements in wild plants of Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1