What Makes Non-Directed Living Kidney Donors Tick? Actionable Items to Increase Non-Directed Live Organ Donation

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70044
Amy S. Wang, Kasi McCune, Ilona Wiener, Brian Runge, Daniela Pasantes, Eric Johnson, Lloyd E. Ratner
{"title":"What Makes Non-Directed Living Kidney Donors Tick? Actionable Items to Increase Non-Directed Live Organ Donation","authors":"Amy S. Wang,&nbsp;Kasi McCune,&nbsp;Ilona Wiener,&nbsp;Brian Runge,&nbsp;Daniela Pasantes,&nbsp;Eric Johnson,&nbsp;Lloyd E. Ratner","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Non-directed donors (NDDs), individuals who donate their organs with no intended recipient, in the United States increased 90-fold from 1999 to 2019. There is a paucity of studies investigating the motivations of NDDs. The objective of our study is to identify actionable items to increase NDDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A survey of kidney NDDs at CUIMC from 2009 to 2021 was conducted. The survey was conducted via Qualtrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy individuals met the study criteria. Forty-seven (67.1%) individuals completed the survey. A total of 98% of respondents reported participating in other altruistic activities prior to donation. A total of 70% donors identified as religious, and 57% reported religion/spirituality positively affected the decision to donate. The three most common factors that got respondents interested in NDD included: (1) hearing about an individual in need of a transplant, (2) knowing someone who had donated an organ, and (3) as a next step in altruistic behavior. A total of 85% said that donating a kidney met or exceeded expectations. A total of 44% and 31% of NDDs were interested in being either liver or uterus NDDs, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We identified six potential action items: (1) Identify pools of receptive individuals who participated in other altruistic behaviors and/or identify as religious. (2) Outreach to individuals who came forward as directed donors, but whose intended recipient was successfully transplanted with a kidney from another donor. (3) Promote stories of those who need organ transplants or whose lives have been changed by transplantation. (4) Promote NDDs as resources for potential NDDs. (5) Educate interested kidney NDDs about liver and uterus transplant programs. (6) Decrease financial barriers to donation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-directed donors (NDDs), individuals who donate their organs with no intended recipient, in the United States increased 90-fold from 1999 to 2019. There is a paucity of studies investigating the motivations of NDDs. The objective of our study is to identify actionable items to increase NDDs.

Methods

A survey of kidney NDDs at CUIMC from 2009 to 2021 was conducted. The survey was conducted via Qualtrics.

Results

Seventy individuals met the study criteria. Forty-seven (67.1%) individuals completed the survey. A total of 98% of respondents reported participating in other altruistic activities prior to donation. A total of 70% donors identified as religious, and 57% reported religion/spirituality positively affected the decision to donate. The three most common factors that got respondents interested in NDD included: (1) hearing about an individual in need of a transplant, (2) knowing someone who had donated an organ, and (3) as a next step in altruistic behavior. A total of 85% said that donating a kidney met or exceeded expectations. A total of 44% and 31% of NDDs were interested in being either liver or uterus NDDs, respectively.

Conclusions

We identified six potential action items: (1) Identify pools of receptive individuals who participated in other altruistic behaviors and/or identify as religious. (2) Outreach to individuals who came forward as directed donors, but whose intended recipient was successfully transplanted with a kidney from another donor. (3) Promote stories of those who need organ transplants or whose lives have been changed by transplantation. (4) Promote NDDs as resources for potential NDDs. (5) Educate interested kidney NDDs about liver and uterus transplant programs. (6) Decrease financial barriers to donation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么让非定向活体肾脏捐赠者做出选择?增加非定向活体器官捐赠的行动项目
从1999年到2019年,美国的非定向捐赠者(ndd)增加了90倍。非定向捐赠者是指在没有预定接受者的情况下捐赠器官的个人。调查ndd动机的研究很少。我们研究的目的是确定可操作的项目来增加ndd。方法对2009 ~ 2021年我院肾脏ndd进行调查。这项调查是通过Qualtrics进行的。结果70例符合研究标准。47人(67.1%)完成了调查。总共有98%的受访者表示在捐赠之前参与了其他利他活动。总共有70%的捐赠者是宗教人士,57%的人表示宗教/灵性对他们的捐赠决定有积极影响。让受访者对NDD感兴趣的三个最常见的因素包括:(1)听说有个人需要移植,(2)知道有人捐献了器官,(3)作为利他行为的下一步。85%的人表示捐肾达到或超过了预期。分别有44%和31%的ndd患者有兴趣成为肝脏ndd或子宫ndd。我们确定了六个潜在的行动项目:(1)确定参与其他利他行为和/或宗教信仰的接受性个体池。(2)向直接捐赠者提供服务,但其预期接受者成功移植了另一个捐赠者的肾脏。(3)宣传需要器官移植或因器官移植而改变生活的人的故事。(4)促进ndd作为潜在ndd的资源。(5)对感兴趣的肾脏NDDs进行肝脏和子宫移植手术的教育。(6)减少捐赠的经济障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Donor App Increases Awareness and Overall Living Kidney Organ Donation Use of Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Circulatory Death Donors for Lung Transplantation in the United States Innovative Trajectory Analysis Reveals Dynamics and Risk Factors of Post-Kidney Transplant Diabetes Mellitus in a French Cohort Normothermic Machine Perfusion Improves Outcomes for Donation After Cardiac Death Allografts With Extended Donor Warm Ischemia Time Type A Aortic Dissection Following Abdominal Solid Organ Transplantation: Population-Level Outcomes in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1