Stimulating development of innovative medicines in the European Union: does a new definition for unmet medical need add value?

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Discovery Today Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104251
Lourens T Bloem, Hubert G M Leufkens, Sophie E Berends, Rick A Vreman, Carla E M Hollak, Sonja van Weely, Larissa M de Lannoy, Peter J A Bertens, Anna M G Pasmooij
{"title":"Stimulating development of innovative medicines in the European Union: does a new definition for unmet medical need add value?","authors":"Lourens T Bloem, Hubert G M Leufkens, Sophie E Berends, Rick A Vreman, Carla E M Hollak, Sonja van Weely, Larissa M de Lannoy, Peter J A Bertens, Anna M G Pasmooij","doi":"10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Commission (EC) has proposed to redefine 'unmet medical need' to steer pharmaceutical innovation and link the definition to incentives and regulatory tools and procedures. A multistakeholder meeting of the Regulatory Science Network Netherlands (RSNN) discussed the impact of this proposal. Four principles were highlighted (flexibility, feasibility, fairness, and sensitivity to risk) that were not considered sufficiently addressed. Concerns were raised about whether innovation would be incentivised, given the diverse and complex reasons why areas of unmet medical need may remain unaddressed. A more high-level definition of unmet medical need that gives guidance but allows for specification for specific uses throughout the medicine lifecycle was generally preferred. As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholder engagement will be essential to refine the definition to achieve the intended policy goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":301,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discovery Today","volume":" ","pages":"104251"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discovery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission (EC) has proposed to redefine 'unmet medical need' to steer pharmaceutical innovation and link the definition to incentives and regulatory tools and procedures. A multistakeholder meeting of the Regulatory Science Network Netherlands (RSNN) discussed the impact of this proposal. Four principles were highlighted (flexibility, feasibility, fairness, and sensitivity to risk) that were not considered sufficiently addressed. Concerns were raised about whether innovation would be incentivised, given the diverse and complex reasons why areas of unmet medical need may remain unaddressed. A more high-level definition of unmet medical need that gives guidance but allows for specification for specific uses throughout the medicine lifecycle was generally preferred. As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholder engagement will be essential to refine the definition to achieve the intended policy goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激欧盟创新药物的发展:未满足医疗需求的新定义是否会增加价值?
欧盟委员会(EC)提议重新定义“未满足的医疗需求”,以引导制药创新,并将其与激励措施和监管工具和程序联系起来。荷兰监管科学网络(RSNN)的多方利益相关者会议讨论了该提案的影响。强调了四项原则(灵活性、可行性、公平性和对风险的敏感性),但这些原则没有得到充分考虑。鉴于医疗需求未得到满足的领域仍未得到解决的原因多样而复杂,人们对是否会鼓励创新表示关切。对于未满足的医疗需求,一般更倾向于采用更高层次的定义,提供指导,但允许对整个药物生命周期的特定用途进行规范。随着立法进程的展开,利益相关者的参与对于完善定义以实现预期的政策目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Discovery Today
Drug Discovery Today 医学-药学
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
2.70%
发文量
293
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Drug Discovery Today delivers informed and highly current reviews for the discovery community. The magazine addresses not only the rapid scientific developments in drug discovery associated technologies but also the management, commercial and regulatory issues that increasingly play a part in how R&D is planned, structured and executed. Features include comment by international experts, news and analysis of important developments, reviews of key scientific and strategic issues, overviews of recent progress in specific therapeutic areas and conference reports.
期刊最新文献
The impact of operational trial approaches on representativeness: Comparison of decentralized clinical trial participants, conventional trial participants, and patients in daily practice. Philanthropic drug development: understanding its importance, mechanisms, and future prospects. Artificial intelligence in peptide-based drug design. Death ligand receptor (DLR) signaling: Its non-apoptotic functions in cancer and the consequences of DLR-directed therapies. Is ChatGPT ready for public use in organ-specific drug toxicity research?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1