Assessing the validity of a wearable shoulder motion tracking system through comparison with dartfish in patients undergoing shoulder joint replacement surgery.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/ad9838
Sohrob MilaniZadeh, Joy C MacDermid, G Daniel Langohr, James Johnson
{"title":"Assessing the validity of a wearable shoulder motion tracking system through comparison with dartfish in patients undergoing shoulder joint replacement surgery.","authors":"Sohrob MilaniZadeh, Joy C MacDermid, G Daniel Langohr, James Johnson","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad9838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective assessments of shoulder motion are paramount for effective rehabilitation and evaluation of surgical outcomes. Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) have demonstrated promise in providing unbiased movement data. This study is dedicated to evaluating the concurrent construct validity and accuracy of a wearable IMU-based sensor system, called 'Motion Shirt', for the assessment of humero-thoracic motion arcs in patients awaiting shoulder replacement surgery. This evaluation was conducted by comparing Motion Shirt data with the Dartfish Motion Analyzer software during the Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) test. Thirteen patients (age > 50), who were awaiting shoulder replacement surgery, were recruited. The Motion Shirt was employed to measure angular humero-thoracic movements in two planes during the FIT-HaNSA test. Simultaneously, two cameras recorded the participants' movements to provide reference data. Bland-Altman plots were generated to visualize agreement between the Motion Shirt and the reference data obtained from the Dartfish Motion Analyzer software. The data analysis on Bland-Altman plots revealed a substantial level of agreement between the Motion Shirt and Dartfish analysis in measuring humero-thoracic motion. In Task-1, no significant systematic errors were exhibited, with only 3.27% and 2.18% of points exceeding the limits of agreement (LOA) in both elevation and the Plane of Elevation (POE), signifying a high level of concordance. In Task-2, a high level of agreement was also observed in Elevation, with only 3.8% of points exceeding the LOA. However, 5.98% of points exceeded LOA in POE for Task-2. In Task-3, focused on sustained overhead activity, the Motion Shirt showed strong agreement with Dartfish in Elevation (2.44% points exceeded LOA), but in POE, 7.32% points exceeded LOA. The Motion Shirt demonstrated a robust concordance with Dartfish Motion Analyzer system in assessing humerothoracic motion during the FIT-HaNSA test. These results affirm the Motion Shirt's suitability for objective motion analysis in patients awaiting shoulder replacement surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad9838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective assessments of shoulder motion are paramount for effective rehabilitation and evaluation of surgical outcomes. Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) have demonstrated promise in providing unbiased movement data. This study is dedicated to evaluating the concurrent construct validity and accuracy of a wearable IMU-based sensor system, called 'Motion Shirt', for the assessment of humero-thoracic motion arcs in patients awaiting shoulder replacement surgery. This evaluation was conducted by comparing Motion Shirt data with the Dartfish Motion Analyzer software during the Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) test. Thirteen patients (age > 50), who were awaiting shoulder replacement surgery, were recruited. The Motion Shirt was employed to measure angular humero-thoracic movements in two planes during the FIT-HaNSA test. Simultaneously, two cameras recorded the participants' movements to provide reference data. Bland-Altman plots were generated to visualize agreement between the Motion Shirt and the reference data obtained from the Dartfish Motion Analyzer software. The data analysis on Bland-Altman plots revealed a substantial level of agreement between the Motion Shirt and Dartfish analysis in measuring humero-thoracic motion. In Task-1, no significant systematic errors were exhibited, with only 3.27% and 2.18% of points exceeding the limits of agreement (LOA) in both elevation and the Plane of Elevation (POE), signifying a high level of concordance. In Task-2, a high level of agreement was also observed in Elevation, with only 3.8% of points exceeding the LOA. However, 5.98% of points exceeded LOA in POE for Task-2. In Task-3, focused on sustained overhead activity, the Motion Shirt showed strong agreement with Dartfish in Elevation (2.44% points exceeded LOA), but in POE, 7.32% points exceeded LOA. The Motion Shirt demonstrated a robust concordance with Dartfish Motion Analyzer system in assessing humerothoracic motion during the FIT-HaNSA test. These results affirm the Motion Shirt's suitability for objective motion analysis in patients awaiting shoulder replacement surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩关节置换术患者可穿戴肩关节运动跟踪系统的有效性评估
客观评估肩部运动对有效的康复和评估手术结果至关重要。惯性测量单元(IMU)在提供无偏运动数据方面已经证明了它的前景。本研究致力于评估一种可穿戴的基于imu的传感器系统,称为“运动衬衫”,用于评估等待肩关节置换术患者的肩部运动弧线的并发构建的有效性和准确性。这项评估是通过比较运动衬衫和达特菲鱼运动分析仪软件在功能损伤测试-手和颈/肩/臂(FIT-HaNSA)测试中的数据来进行的。招募了13名等待肩关节置换手术的患者(年龄0 - 50岁)。在FIT-HaNSA测试中,运动衬衫被用来测量肩膀在两个平面上的角度运动。同时,两台摄像机记录下参与者的动作,以提供参考数据。生成Bland-Altman图,以可视化运动衬衫与从Dartfish运动分析仪软件获得的参考数据之间的一致性。Bland-Altman图的数据分析显示,运动衬衫和达特菲什分析在测量肩部运动方面有很大程度的一致性。在Task-1中,没有出现明显的系统误差,只有3.27%和2.18%的点在高程和高程平面(POE)上都超过了一致性限制(LOA),表明一致性水平较高。在Task-2中,Elevation的一致性也很高,只有3.8%的点超过LOA。然而,5.98%的POE超过了Task-2的LOA。在专注于持续头顶活动的Task-3中,Motion Shirt与Dartfish在Elevation(2.44%的分数超过LOA)中表现出很强的一致性,但在POE(7.32%的分数)中,超过LOA。 ;在FIT-HaNSA测试中,Motion Shirt在评估肩部运动时与Dartfish运动分析器系统表现出很强的一致性。这些结果肯定了运动衬衫在等待肩关节置换术患者的客观运动分析中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
期刊最新文献
Biological cell response to electric field: a review of equivalent circuit models and future challenges. A novel hollow-core antiresonant fiber-based biosensor for blood component detection in the THz regime. Simulations of the potential for diffraction enhanced imaging at 8 kev using polycapillary optics. Determining event-related desynchronization onset latency of foot dorsiflexion in people with multiple sclerosis using the cluster depth tests. Automated detection of traumatic bleeding in CT images using 3D U-Net# and multi-organ segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1