Understanding inequities in access to diabetes technologies in children and young people with type 1 diabetes: Qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives and views.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1111/dme.15486
Rachel Dlugatch, David Rankin, Mark Evans, Nick Oliver, May Ng, Julia Lawton
{"title":"Understanding inequities in access to diabetes technologies in children and young people with type 1 diabetes: Qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives and views.","authors":"Rachel Dlugatch, David Rankin, Mark Evans, Nick Oliver, May Ng, Julia Lawton","doi":"10.1111/dme.15486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We explored healthcare professionals' perceptions and understandings of the factors and considerations underlying inequities in technology access in children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed (n = 29) healthcare professionals working in paediatric diabetes in England recruited from (n = 15) purposively selected sites. We analysed data thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees highlighted multiple, often overlapping barriers to accessing technology faced by CYP with type 1 diabetes from deprived and/or ethnic minority backgrounds. They described the impacts of deprivation on technology uptake, together with the complex social, ethnic and cultural factors that could also reinforce disparities in technology access. Interviewees further highlighted staffing shortfalls as a significant barrier to supporting CYP to use technology, especially those from under-represented groups who they perceived as requiring more staff time to be trained to use technology. While interviewees suggested that unconscious bias has become less prominent, they reported being less likely to recommend technology (especially pumps) to CYP/caregivers who they feared would not use it safely and effectively (e.g. those with low literacy levels). Interviewees also highlighted geographical variability in the technology commissioning process (a 'postcode lottery').</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that without targeted interventions, technology inequities may continue to persist amongst CYP from the most and least deprived areas and from white and ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. Additionally, our findings suggest that closing the technology gap will require large-scale governmental and health policies aimed at fostering socioeconomic, ethnic and cultural equality alongside targeted measures to improve technology accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e15486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: We explored healthcare professionals' perceptions and understandings of the factors and considerations underlying inequities in technology access in children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: We interviewed (n = 29) healthcare professionals working in paediatric diabetes in England recruited from (n = 15) purposively selected sites. We analysed data thematically.

Results: Interviewees highlighted multiple, often overlapping barriers to accessing technology faced by CYP with type 1 diabetes from deprived and/or ethnic minority backgrounds. They described the impacts of deprivation on technology uptake, together with the complex social, ethnic and cultural factors that could also reinforce disparities in technology access. Interviewees further highlighted staffing shortfalls as a significant barrier to supporting CYP to use technology, especially those from under-represented groups who they perceived as requiring more staff time to be trained to use technology. While interviewees suggested that unconscious bias has become less prominent, they reported being less likely to recommend technology (especially pumps) to CYP/caregivers who they feared would not use it safely and effectively (e.g. those with low literacy levels). Interviewees also highlighted geographical variability in the technology commissioning process (a 'postcode lottery').

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that without targeted interventions, technology inequities may continue to persist amongst CYP from the most and least deprived areas and from white and ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. Additionally, our findings suggest that closing the technology gap will require large-scale governmental and health policies aimed at fostering socioeconomic, ethnic and cultural equality alongside targeted measures to improve technology accessibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解1型糖尿病儿童和青少年在获得糖尿病技术方面的不平等:卫生保健专业人员观点和观点的定性研究
目的:我们探讨了医疗保健专业人员对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年(CYP)技术获取不公平的因素和考虑因素的看法和理解。方法:我们采访了(n = 29)名在英国从事儿科糖尿病工作的卫生保健专业人员,这些人员是从(n = 15)有目的地选择的地点招募的。我们对数据进行了主题分析。结果:受访者强调了来自贫困和/或少数民族背景的1型糖尿病CYP在获取技术方面面临的多重、往往重叠的障碍。他们描述了贫困对技术吸收的影响,以及复杂的社会、种族和文化因素,这些因素也可能加剧技术获取方面的差异。受访者进一步强调,人员短缺是支持CYP使用技术的重大障碍,特别是那些来自代表性不足的群体,他们认为需要更多的员工时间来培训使用技术。虽然受访者认为无意识的偏见已经变得不那么突出,但他们报告说,他们不太可能向CYP/护理人员推荐技术(特别是泵),因为他们担心这些技术不能安全有效地使用(例如文化水平低的人)。受访者还强调了技术调试过程中的地理差异(“邮编抽签”)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,如果没有针对性的干预措施,技术不平等可能会继续存在于英国最贫困地区和最贫困地区的CYP中,以及来自白人和少数民族群体的CYP中。此外,我们的研究结果表明,缩小技术差距将需要大规模的政府和卫生政策,旨在促进社会经济、种族和文化平等,同时采取有针对性的措施来改善技术可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
期刊最新文献
The relationship of plasma glucose, stress hyperglycaemia and glycated haemoglobin with intermediate-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes. Consistency of the personalized glycated haemoglobin (pHbA1c) methodology over time in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using continuous glucose monitoring. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetic retinopathy and referral levels in the English National Health Service Diabetic Eye Screening Programme. Healthcare professional views of a diabetes review postal box: A qualitative study. Large group onboarding of Omnipod 5 automated insulin delivery system-Experience from a UK secondary care diabetes service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1