Diabetic Medicine最新文献

Aims: The aim was to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetic retinopathy and referral rates in the English National Health Service (NHS) Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP).

Methods: Non-patient identifiable data are submitted centrally from the 57 regional centres in the NHS DESP on a quarterly basis and analysed using STATA, comparing 01/04/2019-31/03/2020 and 01/04/2021-31/03/2022. Patient characteristics were analysed from National Diabetes Audit (NDA) data.

Results: There were 2,274,635 grades from the 57 centres in 2019-2020 and 2,199,623 grades in 2021-2022. The proportion of eyes with referable DR increased from 3.1% in 2019-2020 to 3.2% in the 2021-2022 NHS year (p < 0.01) with a small increase in the level of non-referable DR from 24.6% to 24.8% (p < 0.01). The median proportion of ungradable eyes in 2019-2020 was 2.6% (IQR: 2.3% to 3.3%) increasing to 3.1% (IQR: 2.5% to 3.7%) in 2021-2022. NDA data demonstrated that the proportions with type 1 diabetes receiving eye screening were higher in the latter year (8.3% vs. 7.3%).

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with small increases in referable retinopathy rates from 3.1% to 3.2%, non-referable DR from 24·6% to 24.8% and an increase in the ungradable image rate from 2.6% to 3.1%, the latter increase possibly being caused by untreated cataract during the pandemic. Risk stratification of invitations in the recovery period was believed to have contributed to keeping the referable rates low and supports a similar approach in extension of the screening interval for low-risk groups.

Background: Non-attendance at diabetes appointments is common, ^1-4 and associated with higher HbA1c levels, reduced medication taking, and increased complications. ^1-45 Barriers to attendance are multifactorial including both logistical and psychosocial factors. ^6-11 A proposed solution is the implementation of a postal diabetes annual review box enabling self-collection of blood and urine samples, and measurement of blood pressure and weight.

Aim: To explore the views of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) who are involved in the organisation or delivery of diabetes care regarding the acceptability and implementation of a postal box as part of the diabetes annual review.

Method: We conducted a qualitative study recruiting HCPs into semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Collected data were analysed using an inductive approach and following the principles of reflexive thematic analysis¹².

Results: Twenty-one HCPs participated in the study. HCPs felt that a postal box could overcome many individual and service factors contributing to non-attendance. They felt the box could encourage self-management behaviours and could be used as a tool for communication. HCPs recognised that the postal box could free up time in appointments to focus on holistic care delivery without further stretching limited resources. HCPs were concerned about the possible additional administrative burden a postal box might create, and the public perception of an intervention which could reduce face-to-face care.

Conclusion: Healthcare professionals seem receptive to the idea of a postal diabetes annual review box and feel it has the potential to offer people with diabetes an improved quality of care.

Aims: This study assessed real-world glycaemic outcomes associated with the use of Dexcom ONE in adults with suboptimally controlled diabetes.

Methods: In this single-site prospective study, adults with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) taking two or more insulin injections per day initiated Dexcom ONE CGM use and attended follow-up data collection visits after 3 and 6 months. During the study, participants received usual diabetes care. Primary outcome was a change in HbA1c at 6 months. Additional outcomes included change in participant-reported outcomes and CGM-derived time in glucose range 3.9-10 mmol/L (TIR), time above range >10 mmol/L (TAR), and time below range <3.9 mmol/L (TBR).

Results: There were 110 adults enrolled [T1D (n = 34): mean age 36.6 years, 55.9% female; T2D (n = 76): mean age 54.9 years, 38.2% female]. Mean HbA1c significantly decreased from 90 mmol/mol (10.3%) to 79 mmol/mol (9.4%) at 6 months (∆-12 mmol/mol, p < 0.001) in T1D users and from 86 mmol/mol (10.1%) to 67 mmol/mol (8.3%) in T2D users (∆-18 mmol/mol, p < 0.001). Perception of health and diabetes distress improved at 6 months for both groups. T1D users had modest improvement in TBR. T2D users exhibited a clinically meaningful increase in TIR (∆ + 9.0%).

Conclusion: Real-world Dexcom ONE use was associated with clinically significant reductions in mean HbA1c after 6 months, along with meaningful improvements in participant-reported outcomes. CGM-derived outcomes also improved, with the possibility of there being greater improvement than could be captured in this study. These findings support expanding access to this real-time CGM system.

Aims: To describe the sonographic features of active Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CNO) and assess the potential role of ultrasound in identifying those with active CNO.

Methods: Using a prospective case-series study design we assessed the sonographic features of 14 patients with a diagnosis of diabetes presenting with clinical signs and symptoms suspicious for active CNO. Patients had standard weight-bearing plain X-Ray and, where possible, MRI to evaluate the presence of active CNO. Ultrasound was performed bilaterally to assess for subcutaneous oedema, intra-articular and peri-articular colour flow. The spectral waveform morphology, peak systolic velocity and resistive index of the dorsalis pedis arteries of both feet were also documented.

Results: Following clinical and radiological (X-ray and MRI) assessment, 50% (n = 7) were diagnosed with active CNO. Of those with a confirmed diagnosis, ≥3 sonographic features suggestive of active CNO were observed.

Conclusions: Ultrasound combined with clinical presentation and medical history may support decision making around the diagnosis of CNO at the bedside.

Aims: This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of a single subcutaneous (s.c.) glucagon dose versus the same total dose split into a dose before and after and placebo (PBO) in preventing exercise-induced hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: Twenty-two adults with T1D participated in a randomised, single-blinded, three-arm crossover study. Participants underwent a 60-min bout of moderate-intensity cycle ergometry (~50% HRmax) in fasted state, followed by 2 h of rest. Plasma glucose (PG) concentrations were monitored at 5- and 15-minute intervals. Participants were randomly assigned to receive two separate injections before (t = 0 min) and just after (t = 60 min) exercise: (i) 150 μg s.c. glucagon (G150) before and PBO after; (ii) 75 μg s.c. glucagon (G75*2) before and after; or (iii) PBO before and after. Insulin pump users reduced their basal insulin rate by 50% during cycling.

Results: The occurrence of hypoglycaemia did not significantly differ between arms (G150: 7, G75*2: 5 and PBO: 6 events, p = 0.078). Mean PG levels throughout the trial were lower in the PBO arm compared to both glucagon arms (G150: 8.6 ± 2.9, G75*2: 8.9 ± 3.4 and PBO: 7.3 ± 2.6 mmol/L, p = 0.015). Time spent with PG in target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) was higher in the PBO arm versus both glucagon arms (G150: 63.9 ± 38.9%, G75*2: 60.0 ± 34.1% and PBO: 82.7 ± 29.6%, p = 0.005), driven by less time above range (G150: 32.9 ± 41.3%, G75*2: 35.9 ± 36.4% and PBO: 13.2 ± 30.2%, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: Low-dose native glucagon did not offer any advantages in preventing exercise-induced hypoglycaemia in individuals with T1D, regardless of glucagon dosing variations.

Background: Young adults (YA) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) are at high risk of worsening glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) with fewer follow-up visits. We examined the association of demographic and diabetes characteristics with care utilization, including in-person and telehealth visits, pre- (1 April 2019 to 15 March 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (30 March 2020 to 15 March 2021) for YA (ages: 18-30) with T1D, comparing those seen in paediatric versus adult diabetes clinics at a single diabetes centre.

Methods: Data were obtained from the electronic health record for YA with a pre-pandemic HbA1c. We performed descriptive statistics to describe the sample and paired t-tests to compare visits before and during the pandemic.

Results: Data from 1762 YA (54% male; age 24.0 ± 3.6 (M ± SD) years; HbA1c 66 ± 18 mmol/mol (8.2 ± 1.6%) revealed that in the full sample, mean pre-pandemic visit frequency was 3.5 ± 3.4 and mean pandemic visit frequency was 3.1 ± 4.1 (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the pandemic visit frequency declined in the adult clinic regardless of sex, pump therapy, CGM use, and pre-pandemic HbA1c, whereas in the paediatric clinic, visit frequency was only reduced for those with HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (<7%) but was otherwise maintained.

Conclusions: In this diabetes centre, the paediatric clinic maintained diabetes care delivery during the pandemic (30 March 2020 to 15 March 2021) to YA with glycaemic control above target, suggesting that preservation of remote care delivery should be considered in this high-risk group.

Background: Trials conducted in highly selected populations have shown that type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission is possible, but the feasibility and acceptability of supporting remission in routine clinical practice remain uncertain.

Aim: We explored primary care professionals' perceptions and understandings of T2D remission and their views about supporting remission within routine clinical care.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 GPs and nine nurses working in Scottish general practices. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Most participants considered remission to be a motivational tool but were unsure that it actually altered clinical management, due to patients still requiring follow-up and their expectations that remission is often temporary because of the constant effort required to sustain remission in an obesogenic environment. These perceptions, together with participants' concerns about loss to follow-up of patients who were likely to relapse and/or were still at high cardiovascular risk, appeared to underpin a reluctance to code remission in medical records. Most participants did not consider remission support to be a clinical priority. Moreover, they described being sensitive to the pitfalls of only encouraging some patients to pursue remission, because if resources were directed towards apparently more motivated, affluent individuals, there was a risk that this could widen health inequalities.

Conclusion: For integration of remission support into mainstream T2D care to be successful, primary care professionals may need to be persuaded that remission matters more than encouraging well-managed T2D. They would also benefit from clear guidance on follow-up and optimal support for people in remission.

Aims: Studies evaluating the relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), namely hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), with the estimated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains limited and could inform patient-centred decision-making in the postpartum period. We examined whether HDP or GDM were associated with a higher 10- and 30-year predicted risk of ASCVD measured 10-14 years after delivery.

Methods: A secondary analysis from the international prospective Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (2013-2016) cohort. The exposures were HDP or GDM (untreated according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria). Outcomes were 10- and 30-year predicted risk of ASCVD (composite of fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease and stroke) as quantified by the validated Framingham Risk Score as a continuous measure, and secondarily, at thresholds used for clinical decision-making of ≥7.5% for 10-year predicted risk and ≥20% for 30-year predicted risk.

Results: Of 4432 individuals at a median age of 30.5 years and a median gestational age of 27.9 weeks at pregnancy enrollment, 10.7% developed HDP and 13.7% developed GDM. At 10-14 years after delivery, individuals with HDP had a higher 10-year predicted risk of ASCVD (least squares mean: 2.9% vs. 2.2%; adj. β: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.77) and a higher 30-year predicted risk of ASCVD (7.7% vs. 6.1%; adj. β: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.81-1.72) compared with those without HDP. Similarly, individuals with GDM had a higher predicted risk of ASCVD (10-year: 3.2% vs. 2.1%; adj. β: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.34-0.67 and 30-year: 8.8% vs. 5.8%; adj. β: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.11-2.01) compared with those without GDM. These results were similar when predicted ASCVD risk was assessed at thresholds of ≥7.5% at 10 years and ≥20% at 30 years.

Conclusion: Individuals who experienced HDP or GDM had a higher predicted 10- and 30-year risk of ASCVD measured 10-14 years after delivery compared with individuals who did not experience these APOs.