{"title":"The effect of cut sizes and pH of tobacco leaf in smokeless tobacco products on the pharmacokinetics of nicotine.","authors":"Ya'ning Fu, Hongjuan Wang, Yingyan Li, Pengpeng Yu, Yue Su, Wanwan Ma, Shulei Han, Yushan Tian, Huan Chen, Hongwei Hou","doi":"10.1080/01480545.2024.2431862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The absorption of nicotine from smokeless tobacco products (STPs) in humans is affected by various factors, including nicotine content, flavoring compounds, cutting format, tobacco cut sizes, and pH. In this study, participants were asked to use STP 1 for a specific period, after which the nicotine content was measured before and after use to determine the release rate using the <i>Weibull model</i>. Blood samples were collected from participants after 30 min of using STP 1 to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics. Additionally, guinea pigs were administered four types of STPs with varying pH levels, and tobacco cut sizes, but with identical nicotine content on the oral mucosa to evaluate nicotine pharmacokinetics. The human results showed that nicotine in STP was quickly released in the mouth, reaching 73.66% within 30 min. Plasma nicotine concentration in guinea pigs and human participants were comparable following STP use. Guinea pigs exposed to STPs with smaller tobacco cut sizes or higher pH absorbed more nicotine and metabolized it more slowly. The findings suggest that pH and cut size of STPs are key factors affecting nicotine absorption, while the impact of flavoring agents and other components on nicotine absorption remains to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":11333,"journal":{"name":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2024.2431862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The absorption of nicotine from smokeless tobacco products (STPs) in humans is affected by various factors, including nicotine content, flavoring compounds, cutting format, tobacco cut sizes, and pH. In this study, participants were asked to use STP 1 for a specific period, after which the nicotine content was measured before and after use to determine the release rate using the Weibull model. Blood samples were collected from participants after 30 min of using STP 1 to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics. Additionally, guinea pigs were administered four types of STPs with varying pH levels, and tobacco cut sizes, but with identical nicotine content on the oral mucosa to evaluate nicotine pharmacokinetics. The human results showed that nicotine in STP was quickly released in the mouth, reaching 73.66% within 30 min. Plasma nicotine concentration in guinea pigs and human participants were comparable following STP use. Guinea pigs exposed to STPs with smaller tobacco cut sizes or higher pH absorbed more nicotine and metabolized it more slowly. The findings suggest that pH and cut size of STPs are key factors affecting nicotine absorption, while the impact of flavoring agents and other components on nicotine absorption remains to be determined.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Chemical Toxicology publishes full-length research papers, review articles and short communications that encompass a broad spectrum of toxicological data surrounding risk assessment and harmful exposure. Manuscripts are considered according to their relevance to the journal.
Topics include both descriptive and mechanics research that illustrates the risk assessment implications of exposure to toxic agents. Examples of suitable topics include toxicological studies, which are structural examinations on the effects of dose, metabolism, and statistical or mechanism-based approaches to risk assessment. New findings and methods, along with safety evaluations, are also acceptable. Special issues may be reserved to publish symposium summaries, reviews in toxicology, and overviews of the practical interpretation and application of toxicological data.