Long-read sequencing enables comprehensive molecular genetic diagnosis of Fabry disease.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Human Genomics Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s40246-024-00697-3
Fengxia Yao, Na Hao, Danhua Li, Weimin Zhang, Jingwen Zhou, Zhengqing Qiu, Aiping Mao, Wanli Meng, Juntao Liu
{"title":"Long-read sequencing enables comprehensive molecular genetic diagnosis of Fabry disease.","authors":"Fengxia Yao, Na Hao, Danhua Li, Weimin Zhang, Jingwen Zhou, Zhengqing Qiu, Aiping Mao, Wanli Meng, Juntao Liu","doi":"10.1186/s40246-024-00697-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical diagnosis of Fabry Disease (FD) can be challenging due to the clinical heterogeneity, especially in females. Patients with FD often experience a prolonged interval between the onset of symptoms and receiving a diagnosis. Genetic testing is the gold standard for precise diagnosis of FD, however conventional genetic testing could miss deep intronic variants and large deletions or duplications. Although next-generation sequencing, which analyzes numerous genes, has been successfully used for FD diagnosis and can detect complex variants, an effective and rapid tool for identifying a wide range of variants is imminent, contributing to decrease the diagnostic delay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The comprehensive Analysis of FD (CAFD) assay was developed for FD genetic diagnosis, employing long-range PCR coupled with long-read sequencing to target the full-length GLA gene and its flanking regions. Its clinical performance was assessed through a comparative analysis with Sanger sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic testing was performed on 82 individuals, including 48 probands and 34 relatives. The CAFD assay additionally identified variants in two probands: one had a novel and de novo pathogenic variant with a 1715 bp insertion in intron 4, and the other carried two deep intronic VUS variants in cis-configuration also in intron 4. In total, CAFD identified 47 different variants among 48 probands. Of these, 42 (89.36%, 42/47) were pathogenic, while 5 (10.64%, 5/47) were VUS. Sixteen (34.04%, 16/47) of the variants were novel, including 15 SNV/Indels and one large intronic insertion. Pedigree analysis of 21 probands identified four de novo disease-causing variants. Hence, FD exhibits not only variable clinical presentations but also a wide spectrum of variants. Utilizing a comprehensive testing algorithm for diagnosing FD, which includes enzyme activity, clinical features, and genetic testing, the diagnostic yield of CAFD is 97.92% (47/48), which is higher than that of conventional Sanger sequencing, at 95.83% (46/48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The duration between initial clinical presentation and diagnosis remains long and winding. CAFD provides precise diagnosis for a wide spectrum of GLA variants, promoting timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment for FD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":"18 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00697-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical diagnosis of Fabry Disease (FD) can be challenging due to the clinical heterogeneity, especially in females. Patients with FD often experience a prolonged interval between the onset of symptoms and receiving a diagnosis. Genetic testing is the gold standard for precise diagnosis of FD, however conventional genetic testing could miss deep intronic variants and large deletions or duplications. Although next-generation sequencing, which analyzes numerous genes, has been successfully used for FD diagnosis and can detect complex variants, an effective and rapid tool for identifying a wide range of variants is imminent, contributing to decrease the diagnostic delay.

Methods: The comprehensive Analysis of FD (CAFD) assay was developed for FD genetic diagnosis, employing long-range PCR coupled with long-read sequencing to target the full-length GLA gene and its flanking regions. Its clinical performance was assessed through a comparative analysis with Sanger sequencing.

Results: Genetic testing was performed on 82 individuals, including 48 probands and 34 relatives. The CAFD assay additionally identified variants in two probands: one had a novel and de novo pathogenic variant with a 1715 bp insertion in intron 4, and the other carried two deep intronic VUS variants in cis-configuration also in intron 4. In total, CAFD identified 47 different variants among 48 probands. Of these, 42 (89.36%, 42/47) were pathogenic, while 5 (10.64%, 5/47) were VUS. Sixteen (34.04%, 16/47) of the variants were novel, including 15 SNV/Indels and one large intronic insertion. Pedigree analysis of 21 probands identified four de novo disease-causing variants. Hence, FD exhibits not only variable clinical presentations but also a wide spectrum of variants. Utilizing a comprehensive testing algorithm for diagnosing FD, which includes enzyme activity, clinical features, and genetic testing, the diagnostic yield of CAFD is 97.92% (47/48), which is higher than that of conventional Sanger sequencing, at 95.83% (46/48).

Conclusion: The duration between initial clinical presentation and diagnosis remains long and winding. CAFD provides precise diagnosis for a wide spectrum of GLA variants, promoting timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment for FD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长读测序使法布里病的全面分子遗传学诊断。
背景:由于临床异质性,尤其是女性,法布里病(FD)的临床诊断具有挑战性。FD患者在出现症状和得到诊断之间的时间间隔通常较长。基因检测是精确诊断FD的金标准,然而传统的基因检测可能会遗漏深层内含子变异和大缺失或重复。虽然分析大量基因的下一代测序已经成功地用于FD诊断,并可以检测复杂的变异,但一种有效而快速的工具可以识别广泛的变异,有助于减少诊断延迟。方法:建立FD的综合分析(CAFD)方法,采用远程PCR结合长读测序,针对GLA全长基因及其侧翼区域进行FD的遗传诊断。通过与Sanger测序的对比分析评估其临床表现。结果:对82人进行了基因检测,其中先证者48人,近亲属34人。CAFD分析还在两个先证物中发现了变异:一个在内含子4中插入了1715 bp的新致病变异,另一个在内含子4中也携带了顺式结构的两个深内含子VUS变异。总的来说,CAFD在48个先证者中鉴定出47种不同的变异。其中致病性42例(89.36%,42/47),VUS 5例(10.64%,5/47)。其中16个(34.04%,16/47)为新变异,包括15个SNV/ indel和1个大内含子插入。21个先证者的家系分析鉴定出4个新发致病变异。因此,FD不仅表现出不同的临床表现,而且表现出广泛的变异。利用酶活性、临床特征、基因检测等综合检测算法诊断FD, CAFD的诊断率为97.92%(47/48),高于常规Sanger测序的95.83%(46/48)。结论:从最初的临床表现到诊断的时间是漫长而曲折的。CAFD为广泛的GLA变异提供精确诊断,促进FD患者的及时诊断和适当治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Genomics
Human Genomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.
期刊最新文献
Sideroflexin family genes were dysregulated and associated with tumor progression in prostate cancers. Systematic analysis of the pharmacogenomics landscape towards clinical implementation of precision therapeutics in Greece. Liver macrophage-derived exosomal miRNA-342-3p promotes liver fibrosis by inhibiting HPCAL1 in stellate cells. Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues. Genetic diversity of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in cohorts of patients affected with SARS-CoV-2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1