Retention in primary care among unstably housed residents of a low-income, inner-city neighborhood with a high prevalence of substance use and related disorders.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02332-y
M Gumprich, W Zhang, J Li, K Salters, R Barrios, P Sereda, C Stanley, R Joe, D Hall, V Lima, G Sincraian, A Marante Changir, R Parry, C Fulton, T Wesseling, J Montaner, S Parashar, David M Moore
{"title":"Retention in primary care among unstably housed residents of a low-income, inner-city neighborhood with a high prevalence of substance use and related disorders.","authors":"M Gumprich, W Zhang, J Li, K Salters, R Barrios, P Sereda, C Stanley, R Joe, D Hall, V Lima, G Sincraian, A Marante Changir, R Parry, C Fulton, T Wesseling, J Montaner, S Parashar, David M Moore","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02332-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to and engagement with primary healthcare can be difficult for marginalized low-income populations residing in inner cities in high-income countries. We designed a study to examine retention in primary care among clients of a novel interdisciplinary primary care clinic in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada who did not previously have access to care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Beginning in June 2021, clients of the Hope to Health clinic were offered enrolment in a cohort study which involved a baseline and follow-up surveys every six months, and linking their data to information from the clinic's electronic medical records. We used Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare clients who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) or deceased, with clients who were retained in care at the end of follow-up, Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to examine independent associations with mortality or LTFU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 425 participants enrolled, the median age was 50 years (IQR 40-59), 286 (67.3%) participants were men and 128 (25.4%) were unstably housed at enrollment. Among 338 participants with at least six months of follow-up after enrolment, 262 participants (67.5%) were retained in care, 20 (5.2%) had moved, 57 (14.7%) were classified as LTFU, and 28 (7.2%) had died with a median of 19.9 months of follow-up time. The risk of death or LTFU was independently associated diagnosed with alcohol use disorder (AUD) (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.23 vs. not; 1.38-3.60), frequency of medical doctor visits (AHR = 0.69 per visit per 3 months; 0.60-0.79) and social work visits (AHR = 0.73 per visit per 3 months; 0.59-0.90. Stimulant use disorder or asthma were not significantly associated with retention in care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that a primary healthcare model of care was successful in retaining over two-thirds of clients in primary healthcare after more than 18 months of follow-up. Additional supports for those diagnosed with alcohol use disorder are needed to retain them in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02332-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to and engagement with primary healthcare can be difficult for marginalized low-income populations residing in inner cities in high-income countries. We designed a study to examine retention in primary care among clients of a novel interdisciplinary primary care clinic in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada who did not previously have access to care.

Methods: Beginning in June 2021, clients of the Hope to Health clinic were offered enrolment in a cohort study which involved a baseline and follow-up surveys every six months, and linking their data to information from the clinic's electronic medical records. We used Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare clients who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) or deceased, with clients who were retained in care at the end of follow-up, Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to examine independent associations with mortality or LTFU.

Results: Among 425 participants enrolled, the median age was 50 years (IQR 40-59), 286 (67.3%) participants were men and 128 (25.4%) were unstably housed at enrollment. Among 338 participants with at least six months of follow-up after enrolment, 262 participants (67.5%) were retained in care, 20 (5.2%) had moved, 57 (14.7%) were classified as LTFU, and 28 (7.2%) had died with a median of 19.9 months of follow-up time. The risk of death or LTFU was independently associated diagnosed with alcohol use disorder (AUD) (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.23 vs. not; 1.38-3.60), frequency of medical doctor visits (AHR = 0.69 per visit per 3 months; 0.60-0.79) and social work visits (AHR = 0.73 per visit per 3 months; 0.59-0.90. Stimulant use disorder or asthma were not significantly associated with retention in care.

Conclusion: We found that a primary healthcare model of care was successful in retaining over two-thirds of clients in primary healthcare after more than 18 months of follow-up. Additional supports for those diagnosed with alcohol use disorder are needed to retain them in care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物使用和相关疾病高发的低收入城市内社区中住房不稳定的居民继续接受初级保健。
引言:对于居住在高收入国家内城的边缘化低收入人口来说,获得和参与初级卫生保健可能很困难。我们设计了一项研究,以检查加拿大温哥华市中心东区一家新型跨学科初级保健诊所的客户在初级保健方面的保留情况,这些客户以前没有获得过护理。方法:从2021年6月开始,希望健康诊所的客户被纳入一项队列研究,该研究包括每六个月进行一次基线和随访调查,并将他们的数据与诊所电子病历的信息联系起来。我们使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验来比较失去随访(LTFU)或死亡的患者与随访结束时仍在护理的患者,使用Cox比例风险模型来检查与死亡率或LTFU的独立关联。结果:纳入的425名参与者中,年龄中位数为50岁(IQR 40-59), 286名(67.3%)参与者为男性,128名(25.4%)参与者入组时居住不稳定。在入组后随访至少6个月的338名参与者中,262名(67.5%)参与者仍在护理中,20名(5.2%)参与者搬迁,57名(14.7%)参与者被归类为LTFU, 28名(7.2%)参与者死亡,随访时间中位数为19.9个月。死亡或LTFU的风险与酒精使用障碍(AUD)的诊断独立相关(校正风险比[AHR] = 2.23 vs. 0;1.38-3.60)、就诊频率(AHR =每3个月0.69次就诊;0.60-0.79)和社会工作探访(AHR = 0.73 / 3个月;0.59 - -0.90。兴奋剂使用障碍或哮喘与留置治疗无显著相关。结论:我们发现,经过18个月的随访,初级保健模式成功地保留了超过三分之二的初级保健客户。需要为那些被诊断为酒精使用障碍的人提供额外支持,以使他们继续受到照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Gender and intersectional barriers to child immunization: findings from qualitative research in Nigeria. Racial, ethnic, gender and age representation of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of cancer therapies. A critical anthropological evaluation of digital media based interventions for mycetoma in Sudan; the case of "Hope for a Devastating Neglected Disease" documentary film. Determinants of women's autonomy in healthcare decision-making in Somalia: evidence from the 2020 demographic and health survey. Defining advocacy in public health: a scoping review to inform policy, training, and equity-oriented action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1