Performance of the EULAR Systemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis.
Rucsandra Dobrota, Alexandru Garaiman, Kim Fligelstone, Ann Tyrrell Kennedy, Annelise Roennow, Yannick Allanore, Patricia E Carreira, László Czirják, Chris Denton, Roger Hesselstrand, Gunnel Sandqvist, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka, Cosimo Bruni, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Carina Mihai, Ana Maria Gherghe, Ulf Mueller-Ladner, Tore Kvien, Turid Heiberg, Oliver Distler, Mike Oliver Becker
{"title":"Performance of the EULAR Systemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Rucsandra Dobrota, Alexandru Garaiman, Kim Fligelstone, Ann Tyrrell Kennedy, Annelise Roennow, Yannick Allanore, Patricia E Carreira, László Czirják, Chris Denton, Roger Hesselstrand, Gunnel Sandqvist, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka, Cosimo Bruni, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Carina Mihai, Ana Maria Gherghe, Ulf Mueller-Ladner, Tore Kvien, Turid Heiberg, Oliver Distler, Mike Oliver Becker","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) is the first comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically developed for systemic sclerosis (SSc). We investigated the performance of ScleroID in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), as a prerequisite for its use in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing potentially disease-modifying drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with dcSSc from the large, multicentric, ScleroID cohort were included. SSc-Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EuroQol-5 Dimensions and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used as comparators. The study includes a longitudinal arm with a reliability visit at 7±3 days and a 12 months follow-up visit. The performance of ScleroID in dcSSc was assessed according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology filter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 152 dcSSc patients were analysed (29% male, median age 54 years). ScleroID reflected well the disease impact of dcSSc, showing a good construct validity with high Spearman's correlation coefficients with comparators (SSc-HAQ, 0.79, 95% CI (0.69, 0.86); HAQ-Disability Index, 0.72 95% CI (0.60, 0.80); SF-36 physical score, -0.69 95% CI (-0.77, -0.60)). The internal consistency was strong (Cronbach's alpha 0.87, split-half reliability coefficient 0.88).In the longitudinal arm, 44 patients had a reliability visit and 113 had a follow-up visit, of whom 19/113 (17%) reported a significant change (11 improved, 8 worsened). ScleroID showed a good consistency and discriminative ability with excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89, 95% CI (0.84, 0.92)) and moderate sensitivity to change (standardised response mean -0.63 in the improved subgroup and 0.48 in the worsened subgroup), but superior to the comparators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) ScleroID performs well for patients with dcSSc. This supports its inclusion and regular assessment as PROM in RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Systemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) is the first comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically developed for systemic sclerosis (SSc). We investigated the performance of ScleroID in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), as a prerequisite for its use in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing potentially disease-modifying drugs.
Methods: All patients with dcSSc from the large, multicentric, ScleroID cohort were included. SSc-Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EuroQol-5 Dimensions and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used as comparators. The study includes a longitudinal arm with a reliability visit at 7±3 days and a 12 months follow-up visit. The performance of ScleroID in dcSSc was assessed according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology filter.
Results: In total, 152 dcSSc patients were analysed (29% male, median age 54 years). ScleroID reflected well the disease impact of dcSSc, showing a good construct validity with high Spearman's correlation coefficients with comparators (SSc-HAQ, 0.79, 95% CI (0.69, 0.86); HAQ-Disability Index, 0.72 95% CI (0.60, 0.80); SF-36 physical score, -0.69 95% CI (-0.77, -0.60)). The internal consistency was strong (Cronbach's alpha 0.87, split-half reliability coefficient 0.88).In the longitudinal arm, 44 patients had a reliability visit and 113 had a follow-up visit, of whom 19/113 (17%) reported a significant change (11 improved, 8 worsened). ScleroID showed a good consistency and discriminative ability with excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89, 95% CI (0.84, 0.92)) and moderate sensitivity to change (standardised response mean -0.63 in the improved subgroup and 0.48 in the worsened subgroup), but superior to the comparators.
Conclusion: The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) ScleroID performs well for patients with dcSSc. This supports its inclusion and regular assessment as PROM in RCTs.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.