A qualitative study of attitudes and perceptions of smoking cessation medication among patients with cancer.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09030-z
Jennifer Gittleman, Joanna G Cloutier, Elyse R Park, Autumn Rasmussen, Colin Ponzani, Andrea H Weinberger, Jamie S Ostroff, Giselle Perez
{"title":"A qualitative study of attitudes and perceptions of smoking cessation medication among patients with cancer.","authors":"Jennifer Gittleman, Joanna G Cloutier, Elyse R Park, Autumn Rasmussen, Colin Ponzani, Andrea H Weinberger, Jamie S Ostroff, Giselle Perez","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09030-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Among patients with cancer, tobacco use remains high. Nearly half who report smoking at diagnosis continue to smoke following diagnosis, and use of smoking cessation medication remains low. This study explores attitudes, barriers, and preferences for smoking cessation medication among patients enrolled in a tobacco treatment trial in the context of cancer care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary qualitative analysis of the Smokefree Support Study. Of 221 participants who completed the 6-month follow-up survey, n = 72 participants were randomly selected for an exit interview. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, recorded, transcribed, and individually coded using NVivo 11 until high interrater reliability was reached (Kappa > 0.86).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (55.6% female) were predominantly White (83.3%) and on average 60 years old. Many participants held negative beliefs about smoking cessation medications, primarily concerns about safety and side effects in the context of cancer treatment. Lack of understanding interactions with ongoing chemotherapy and access were the most common barriers reported by those who did not use cessation medication during the study. For those who did use medication during the study, positive outcomes included craving reduction, ease of use and access, and psychological benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest a knowledge gap in the safety and effectiveness of smoking cessation medications, specifically in relation to cancer care. Addressing this knowledge gap may increase medication uptake, adherence, and quit rates. Cancer care providers are seen as instrumental in emphasizing the importance and safety of smoking cessation medications as well as patient access concerns.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Tobacco use among patients with cancer remains high and has serious clinical implications. Tobacco cessation is associated with decreased treatment-related toxicity, decreased risk of second primary cancers, and increased survival rates. Smoking cessation medications are effective, yet patients with cancer have low usage rates. Elucidating reasons associated with smoking cessation medication nonadherence will assist cancer care providers in better addressing factors that increase adherence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09030-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Among patients with cancer, tobacco use remains high. Nearly half who report smoking at diagnosis continue to smoke following diagnosis, and use of smoking cessation medication remains low. This study explores attitudes, barriers, and preferences for smoking cessation medication among patients enrolled in a tobacco treatment trial in the context of cancer care.

Methods: This is a secondary qualitative analysis of the Smokefree Support Study. Of 221 participants who completed the 6-month follow-up survey, n = 72 participants were randomly selected for an exit interview. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, recorded, transcribed, and individually coded using NVivo 11 until high interrater reliability was reached (Kappa > 0.86).

Results: Participants (55.6% female) were predominantly White (83.3%) and on average 60 years old. Many participants held negative beliefs about smoking cessation medications, primarily concerns about safety and side effects in the context of cancer treatment. Lack of understanding interactions with ongoing chemotherapy and access were the most common barriers reported by those who did not use cessation medication during the study. For those who did use medication during the study, positive outcomes included craving reduction, ease of use and access, and psychological benefits.

Conclusion: The findings suggest a knowledge gap in the safety and effectiveness of smoking cessation medications, specifically in relation to cancer care. Addressing this knowledge gap may increase medication uptake, adherence, and quit rates. Cancer care providers are seen as instrumental in emphasizing the importance and safety of smoking cessation medications as well as patient access concerns.

Implications: Tobacco use among patients with cancer remains high and has serious clinical implications. Tobacco cessation is associated with decreased treatment-related toxicity, decreased risk of second primary cancers, and increased survival rates. Smoking cessation medications are effective, yet patients with cancer have low usage rates. Elucidating reasons associated with smoking cessation medication nonadherence will assist cancer care providers in better addressing factors that increase adherence rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者对戒烟药物的态度和认知的定性研究。
目的:在癌症患者中,烟草使用率仍然很高。近一半在诊断时报告吸烟的人在诊断后继续吸烟,戒烟药物的使用仍然很低。本研究探讨了在癌症治疗背景下参加烟草治疗试验的患者对戒烟药物的态度、障碍和偏好。方法:这是对无烟支持研究的二次定性分析。在完成6个月随访调查的221名参与者中,随机抽取72名参与者进行离职面谈。访谈采用半结构化访谈指南进行,使用NVivo 11进行记录、转录和单独编码,直到达到高互信度(Kappa > 0.86)。结果:参与者(女性55.6%)以白人(83.3%)为主,平均年龄60岁。许多参与者对戒烟药物持负面看法,主要是担心癌症治疗的安全性和副作用。在研究期间,没有使用戒烟药物的患者报告说,不了解与正在进行的化疗的相互作用和获取途径是最常见的障碍。对于那些在研究期间使用药物的人来说,积极的结果包括渴望减少、易于使用和获取以及心理上的益处。结论:研究结果表明,在戒烟药物的安全性和有效性方面存在知识差距,特别是与癌症治疗有关的知识差距。解决这一知识差距可能会增加药物摄取、依从性和戒烟率。癌症治疗提供者被视为强调戒烟药物的重要性和安全性以及患者获取问题的工具。意义:癌症患者的烟草使用率仍然很高,具有严重的临床意义。戒烟与降低治疗相关毒性、降低第二原发癌症风险和提高生存率有关。戒烟药物是有效的,但癌症患者的使用率很低。阐明与戒烟药物不依从性相关的原因将有助于癌症护理提供者更好地解决增加依从率的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle perceptions following multimodal prehabilitation in patients undergoing cancer surgery: a qualitative study. Association between oral health and frailty among older cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Oral health-related quality of life and dental treatment need 5 to 10 years after hematopoietic cell transplantation. GLP-1 receptor agonists during chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a supportive care call for nutrition-centred monitoring in the era of widespread prescribing. Comment on "Age at diagnosis, lifestyle factors, and risk of mortality: a city-wide cohort study of cancer survivors".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1