Ecological compensation for cross-regional domestic waste treatment: A stochastic differential game perspective.

IF 3.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Waste Management & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1177/0734242X241299099
Mengdi Li, Chuanfeng Han, Lingpeng Meng, Zhiguo Shao, Pihui Liu
{"title":"Ecological compensation for cross-regional domestic waste treatment: A stochastic differential game perspective.","authors":"Mengdi Li, Chuanfeng Han, Lingpeng Meng, Zhiguo Shao, Pihui Liu","doi":"10.1177/0734242X241299099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of ecological compensation for cross-regional domestic waste treatment is beneficial for balancing the interests of waste generation districts and waste treatment districts. This paper introduces dynamic differential games to capture the temporal evolution and adjustment of strategies, examining dynamic game strategies under different compensation scenarios (non-horizontal ecological compensation, horizontal ecological compensation and fully shared ecological compensation). A new interest distribution model is proposed, with empirical analysis conducted using Shanghai as a case study to validate the reliability and feasibility of the model. The findings indicate: (1) Government intervention combined with horizontal ecological compensation significantly improves waste management efficiency and urban welfare. The compensation mechanism fosters regional cooperation, optimizes resource allocation, reduces decision-making conflicts and enhances overall processing effectiveness. (2) Without a compensation mechanism, high costs in export regions and low benefits in import regions result in low cooperation willingness. The ecological compensation mechanism enhances willingness to cooperate by fairly distributing costs and benefits, optimizing long-term cooperation and overall gains. (3) Complete shared ecological compensation is optimal, though partial shared mechanisms are also effective in practice. Proper interest and ecological compensation ratios can significantly improve waste management efficiency and urban environment, strengthening long-term cooperation. The study theoretically expands the dynamic optimization and cooperation mechanism analysis in waste management, provides solutions for environmental policy formulation in cross-regional waste handling and offers new perspectives and tools for addressing complex issues in cross-regional environmental governance, including targeted policy recommendations with practical significance for enhancing cross-regional waste management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23671,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management & Research","volume":" ","pages":"734242X241299099"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management & Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241299099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of ecological compensation for cross-regional domestic waste treatment is beneficial for balancing the interests of waste generation districts and waste treatment districts. This paper introduces dynamic differential games to capture the temporal evolution and adjustment of strategies, examining dynamic game strategies under different compensation scenarios (non-horizontal ecological compensation, horizontal ecological compensation and fully shared ecological compensation). A new interest distribution model is proposed, with empirical analysis conducted using Shanghai as a case study to validate the reliability and feasibility of the model. The findings indicate: (1) Government intervention combined with horizontal ecological compensation significantly improves waste management efficiency and urban welfare. The compensation mechanism fosters regional cooperation, optimizes resource allocation, reduces decision-making conflicts and enhances overall processing effectiveness. (2) Without a compensation mechanism, high costs in export regions and low benefits in import regions result in low cooperation willingness. The ecological compensation mechanism enhances willingness to cooperate by fairly distributing costs and benefits, optimizing long-term cooperation and overall gains. (3) Complete shared ecological compensation is optimal, though partial shared mechanisms are also effective in practice. Proper interest and ecological compensation ratios can significantly improve waste management efficiency and urban environment, strengthening long-term cooperation. The study theoretically expands the dynamic optimization and cooperation mechanism analysis in waste management, provides solutions for environmental policy formulation in cross-regional waste handling and offers new perspectives and tools for addressing complex issues in cross-regional environmental governance, including targeted policy recommendations with practical significance for enhancing cross-regional waste management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨区域生活垃圾处理的生态补偿:一个随机微分博弈视角。
实施跨区域生活垃圾处理生态补偿,有利于平衡垃圾产生区和垃圾处理区的利益。本文引入动态差分对策,考察了不同补偿情景(非水平生态补偿、水平生态补偿和完全共享生态补偿)下的动态博弈策略。提出了一种新的利益分配模型,并以上海市为例进行了实证分析,验证了模型的可靠性和可行性。研究结果表明:(1)政府干预与横向生态补偿相结合,显著提高了城市垃圾管理效率和城市福利。补偿机制促进了区域合作,优化了资源配置,减少了决策冲突,提高了整体处理效率。(2)由于缺乏补偿机制,出口地区成本高,进口地区效益低,导致合作意愿低。生态补偿机制通过公平分配成本和收益,优化长期合作和整体收益,增强合作意愿。(3)完全共享的生态补偿是最优的,但部分共享机制在实践中也是有效的。适当的利息和生态补偿比例可以显著提高废物管理效率和城市环境,加强长期合作。本研究在理论上拓展了废物管理的动态优化与合作机制分析,为跨区域废物处理的环境政策制定提供了解决方案,为解决跨区域环境治理中的复杂问题提供了新的视角和工具,包括有针对性的政策建议,对加强跨区域废物管理具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waste Management & Research
Waste Management & Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
232
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Waste Management & Research (WM&R) publishes peer-reviewed articles relating to both the theory and practice of waste management and research. Published on behalf of the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) topics include: wastes (focus on solids), processes and technologies, management systems and tools, and policy and regulatory frameworks, sustainable waste management designs, operations, policies or practices.
期刊最新文献
Implementing biowaste source segregation for sustainable decentralized composting schemes in Tiassalé, southern Côte d'Ivoire. Towards more sustainable oceans: A review of the pressing challenges posed by marine plastic litter. Pollution risk assessment in sub-basins of an open dump using drones and geographic information systems. Municipal solid waste management instruments that influence the use of the refuse as fuel in developing countries: A critical review. Solid waste generation prediction model framework using socioeconomic and demographic factors with real-time MSW collection data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1