Digital (mis)trust: ethnographic encounters with computational forms.

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal of Cultural Economy Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17530350.2024.2407853
James Maguire, Kristoffer Albris
{"title":"Digital (mis)trust: ethnographic encounters with computational forms.","authors":"James Maguire, Kristoffer Albris","doi":"10.1080/17530350.2024.2407853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This special issue is driven by a curiosity about the role of computational forms - practices, logics, technologies, and infrastructures - in social life and how they mediate issues of trust and mistrust: designated <i>(mis)trust</i>. Through a series of ethnographic encounters, its contributors describe how (mis)trust is rendered as an issue of concern by various actors as it is problematized, conceptualized, narrated, and designed for. In doing so, the papers analyse the work (mis)trust does in these settings, with a focus on the role of computational thinking within public discourses on democratic elections, the use of computational technologies in establishing bureaucratic order, the computational practices at play in the production of coding subjectivities, and the computational artefacts that assure data circulations within digital infrastructures. This introduction argues for a more expansive understanding of the relation between trust and mistrust in the digital age, countering the oftentimes default rendering of these concepts as antonymic. Instead, it argues that they live in a mutable relation. Despite prevailing technosolutionist approaches to (mis)trust, it cannot, we suggest, be solved for, resolved, or even eviscerated. Whatever actors (engineers, programmers, professionals etc) do in their efforts to 'fix' mistrust, it continues to mutate as a social form.</p>","PeriodicalId":46876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Economy","volume":"17 6","pages":"725-736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2024.2407853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue is driven by a curiosity about the role of computational forms - practices, logics, technologies, and infrastructures - in social life and how they mediate issues of trust and mistrust: designated (mis)trust. Through a series of ethnographic encounters, its contributors describe how (mis)trust is rendered as an issue of concern by various actors as it is problematized, conceptualized, narrated, and designed for. In doing so, the papers analyse the work (mis)trust does in these settings, with a focus on the role of computational thinking within public discourses on democratic elections, the use of computational technologies in establishing bureaucratic order, the computational practices at play in the production of coding subjectivities, and the computational artefacts that assure data circulations within digital infrastructures. This introduction argues for a more expansive understanding of the relation between trust and mistrust in the digital age, countering the oftentimes default rendering of these concepts as antonymic. Instead, it argues that they live in a mutable relation. Despite prevailing technosolutionist approaches to (mis)trust, it cannot, we suggest, be solved for, resolved, or even eviscerated. Whatever actors (engineers, programmers, professionals etc) do in their efforts to 'fix' mistrust, it continues to mutate as a social form.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字(错误)信任:人种学与计算形式的相遇。
本期特刊是由对计算形式(实践、逻辑、技术和基础设施)在社会生活中的作用以及它们如何调解信任和不信任问题的好奇心驱动的:指定的(错误的)信任。通过一系列的民族志遭遇,它的贡献者描述了(错误)信任是如何被呈现为各种行动者所关注的问题,因为它是问题化的,概念化的,叙述的,以及设计的。在此过程中,论文分析了这些环境中的工作(错误)信任,重点关注计算思维在民主选举公共话语中的作用,在建立官僚秩序中使用计算技术,在编码主体性生产中发挥作用的计算实践,以及确保数字基础设施内数据流通的计算人工制品。这篇引言主张对数字时代信任和不信任之间的关系进行更广泛的理解,反驳了通常将这些概念默认为反义词的观点。相反,它认为它们生活在一个可变的关系中。尽管主流的技术解决方案方法(错误)信任,它不能,我们建议,被解决,解决,甚至去除。无论参与者(工程师、程序员、专业人士等)如何努力“修复”不信任,它都将继续作为一种社会形式发生变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Digital (mis)trust: ethnographic encounters with computational forms. The politics of climate risk: How the climate issue is turned into a risk issue through the little tools and operations of finance Algorithms and the Assault on Critical Thought: Digitalized Dilemmas of Automated Governance and Communitarian Practice Interventions and dissonance in industrial research: dressing the emperor in new clothes? ‘I’m not going to feed the bailiffs’: personal bankruptcy and debtor agency in narrative accounts of struggling debtors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1