Effects of restraint stress and orthodontic treatment on physical and psychological states in rats.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.10.002
Ye Cheng, Hua Nie, Jun Qian, Jiangyue Lu, Yanfen Li, Huang Li, Fuhua Yan
{"title":"Effects of restraint stress and orthodontic treatment on physical and psychological states in rats.","authors":"Ye Cheng, Hua Nie, Jun Qian, Jiangyue Lu, Yanfen Li, Huang Li, Fuhua Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of restraint stress and orthodontic tooth movement on the body weight and behavior of rats.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty 8-week-old male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham stress nonorthodontic (CC), sham stress orthodontic (CO), stress nonorthodontic (SC) and stress orthodontic (SO). Rats in the stress group were subjected to restraint stress for 21 days, and those in the orthodontic group received molar retraction on days 8 to 21 (D8-D21). The weights of the rats were measured, and behavioral tests were performed on D0, D10, and D20. Serum corticosterone levels in the rats were measured on D0, D4, D8, D12, D16, and D21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weights of rats in the CO, SC, and SO groups were significantly lower than those in the CC group. In the open-field test, the number of times the rats entered the central zone in the CC group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups. In the elevated plus maze test, at D10, the number of times the rats entered the open arms in the SO, SC, and CO groups was significantly lower than that in the CC group. From D12, the serum corticosterone levels in the CO, SC, and SO groups were significantly higher than those in the CC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both restraint stress and orthodontic tooth movement interventions may have adverse effects on weight, behavior, and neuroendocrine responses. However, overlapping the two intervention methods did not increase the magnitude of the effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of restraint stress and orthodontic tooth movement on the body weight and behavior of rats.

Materials and methods: Twenty 8-week-old male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham stress nonorthodontic (CC), sham stress orthodontic (CO), stress nonorthodontic (SC) and stress orthodontic (SO). Rats in the stress group were subjected to restraint stress for 21 days, and those in the orthodontic group received molar retraction on days 8 to 21 (D8-D21). The weights of the rats were measured, and behavioral tests were performed on D0, D10, and D20. Serum corticosterone levels in the rats were measured on D0, D4, D8, D12, D16, and D21.

Results: The weights of rats in the CO, SC, and SO groups were significantly lower than those in the CC group. In the open-field test, the number of times the rats entered the central zone in the CC group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups. In the elevated plus maze test, at D10, the number of times the rats entered the open arms in the SO, SC, and CO groups was significantly lower than that in the CC group. From D12, the serum corticosterone levels in the CO, SC, and SO groups were significantly higher than those in the CC group.

Conclusions: Both restraint stress and orthodontic tooth movement interventions may have adverse effects on weight, behavior, and neuroendocrine responses. However, overlapping the two intervention methods did not increase the magnitude of the effect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约束应激与正畸治疗对大鼠身心状态的影响。
目的:探讨约束应激和正畸牙齿运动对大鼠体重和行为的影响。材料与方法:选取8周龄雄性Wistar大鼠20只,随机分为4组:假应激非正畸(CC)组、假应激正畸(CO)组、应激非正畸(SC)组和应激正畸(SO)组。应激组大鼠进行约束应激21 d,正畸组大鼠在第8 ~ 21天(D8-D21)进行磨牙牵出。测量大鼠体重,D0、D10、D20进行行为学测试。在D0、D4、D8、D12、D16、D21时测定大鼠血清皮质酮水平。结果:CO、SC、SO组大鼠体重均明显低于CC组。在空地试验中,CC组大鼠进入中心区的次数明显高于其他三组。在升高加迷宫实验中,D10时,SO、SC、CO组大鼠进入张开臂的次数明显低于CC组。从D12开始,CO、SC和SO组的血清皮质酮水平显著高于CC组。结论:约束压力和正畸牙齿运动干预都可能对体重、行为和神经内分泌反应产生不利影响。然而,重叠两种干预方法并没有增加效果的大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Comparing the efficacy of heat-activated NiTi (HANT) versus conventional NiTi archwires: A systematic review and meta-analysis Knowledge, attitude, and perception of orthodontic students, and orthodontists regarding role of artificial intelligence in field of orthodontics—An online cross-sectional survey Three-dimensional assessment of alveolar bone changes and root resorption in extraction patients after fixed orthodontic treatment: A prospective study Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone remodeling and root length changes in fixed appliances versus clear aligners: A retrospective cohort study on skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment Skeletal and dental open bite treatment using clear aligners and orthodontic miniscrew-anchored fixed appliances in permanent dentition: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1