Growing practices and the use of potentially harmful chemical additives from a web survey of mainly small-scale cannabis growers in 18 countries.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104662
Simon Lenton, Gary Potter, Davide Fortin, Ashely Granville, Jodie Grigg, Eric Sevigny, Chris Wilkins, Tom Decorte, Monica Barratt
{"title":"Growing practices and the use of potentially harmful chemical additives from a web survey of mainly small-scale cannabis growers in 18 countries.","authors":"Simon Lenton, Gary Potter, Davide Fortin, Ashely Granville, Jodie Grigg, Eric Sevigny, Chris Wilkins, Tom Decorte, Monica Barratt","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is emerging recognition of the risks of harmful chemical pesticides, fertilizers and 'nutrients' by cannabis growers. One group of chemicals, Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs), many of which have been banned from food crops for decades, have been found unlisted in a number of fertilizers and supplements marketed at cannabis growers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper predominately uses data from a 2020-21 convenience web survey of mainly small-scale, recent (last 5yrs) cannabis growers from 18 countries (n = 11,479). We describe their growing practices and use of chemicals and employ logistic regression to explore predictors of chemical use. We also compare chemical use in our 2020-21 sample with that from our 2012-13 data in the 3 countries (Australia, Denmark, UK) where respondents were asked about their use of growing chemicals in both surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020-21, 26 % of recent cannabis growers reported use of chemicals. Growers who were at highest odds of using chemicals were male, older, living in urban/cities, not growing for environmental reasons, growing in order to sell, growing where they believed cannabis was legal, and growing under artificial light in soil or non-soil media. We found significant reductions in the proportions of our samples who reported using chemical fertilizers in the 3 countries where we collected data in both waves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Growers using soil and artificial light comprised over half of all the chemical users in the sample. Efforts at informing and educating growers about the problems of chemical fertilizer, nutrient and pesticide use should include all growers including those who grow in soil under artificial light. Possible explanations for the apparent decrease in chemical use from our 2012-13 to 2020-21 samples are discussed. Stricter regulation of the legal cannabis fertilizer market is required to empower growers to reduce the toxicity of cannabis they grow, distribute and consume.</p>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":" ","pages":"104662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is emerging recognition of the risks of harmful chemical pesticides, fertilizers and 'nutrients' by cannabis growers. One group of chemicals, Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs), many of which have been banned from food crops for decades, have been found unlisted in a number of fertilizers and supplements marketed at cannabis growers.

Methods: This paper predominately uses data from a 2020-21 convenience web survey of mainly small-scale, recent (last 5yrs) cannabis growers from 18 countries (n = 11,479). We describe their growing practices and use of chemicals and employ logistic regression to explore predictors of chemical use. We also compare chemical use in our 2020-21 sample with that from our 2012-13 data in the 3 countries (Australia, Denmark, UK) where respondents were asked about their use of growing chemicals in both surveys.

Results: In 2020-21, 26 % of recent cannabis growers reported use of chemicals. Growers who were at highest odds of using chemicals were male, older, living in urban/cities, not growing for environmental reasons, growing in order to sell, growing where they believed cannabis was legal, and growing under artificial light in soil or non-soil media. We found significant reductions in the proportions of our samples who reported using chemical fertilizers in the 3 countries where we collected data in both waves.

Conclusion: Growers using soil and artificial light comprised over half of all the chemical users in the sample. Efforts at informing and educating growers about the problems of chemical fertilizer, nutrient and pesticide use should include all growers including those who grow in soil under artificial light. Possible explanations for the apparent decrease in chemical use from our 2012-13 to 2020-21 samples are discussed. Stricter regulation of the legal cannabis fertilizer market is required to empower growers to reduce the toxicity of cannabis they grow, distribute and consume.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Prospective association of interventions for at-risk families with illicit drug use among young students in Taiwan The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth Haven't I waited long enough? The role of wait times and subjective impairment in cannabis-related driving behavior Growing practices and the use of potentially harmful chemical additives from a web survey of mainly small-scale cannabis growers in 18 countries. National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1