Genetic-by-age interaction analyses on complex traits in UK Biobank and their potential to identify effects on longitudinal trait change.

IF 12.3 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Genome Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s13059-024-03439-9
Thomas W Winkler, Simon Wiegrebe, Janina M Herold, Klaus J Stark, Helmut Küchenhoff, Iris M Heid
{"title":"Genetic-by-age interaction analyses on complex traits in UK Biobank and their potential to identify effects on longitudinal trait change.","authors":"Thomas W Winkler, Simon Wiegrebe, Janina M Herold, Klaus J Stark, Helmut Küchenhoff, Iris M Heid","doi":"10.1186/s13059-024-03439-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of loci for disease-related human traits in cross-sectional data. However, the impact of age on genetic effects is underacknowledged. Also, identifying genetic effects on longitudinal trait change has been hampered by small sample sizes for longitudinal data. Such effects on deteriorating trait levels over time or disease progression can be clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under certain assumptions, we demonstrate analytically that genetic-by-age interaction observed in cross-sectional data can be indicative of genetic association on longitudinal trait change. We propose a 2-stage approach with genome-wide pre-screening for genetic-by-age interaction in cross-sectional data and testing identified variants for longitudinal change in independent longitudinal data. Within UK Biobank cross-sectional data, we analyze 8 complex traits (up to 370,000 individuals). We identify 44 genetic-by-age interactions (7 loci for obesity traits, 26 for pulse pressure, few to none for lipids). Our cross-trait view reveals trait-specificity regarding the proportion of loci with age-modulated effects, which is particularly high for pulse pressure. Testing the 44 variants in longitudinal data (up to 50,000 individuals), we observe significant effects on change for obesity traits (near APOE, TMEM18, TFAP2B) and pulse pressure (near FBN1, IGFBP3; known for implication in arterial stiffness processes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide analytical and empirical evidence that cross-sectional genetic-by-age interaction can help pinpoint longitudinal-change effects, when cross-sectional data surpasses longitudinal sample size. Our findings shed light on the distinction between traits that are impacted by age-dependent genetic effects and those that are not.</p>","PeriodicalId":48922,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"25 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03439-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of loci for disease-related human traits in cross-sectional data. However, the impact of age on genetic effects is underacknowledged. Also, identifying genetic effects on longitudinal trait change has been hampered by small sample sizes for longitudinal data. Such effects on deteriorating trait levels over time or disease progression can be clinically relevant.

Results: Under certain assumptions, we demonstrate analytically that genetic-by-age interaction observed in cross-sectional data can be indicative of genetic association on longitudinal trait change. We propose a 2-stage approach with genome-wide pre-screening for genetic-by-age interaction in cross-sectional data and testing identified variants for longitudinal change in independent longitudinal data. Within UK Biobank cross-sectional data, we analyze 8 complex traits (up to 370,000 individuals). We identify 44 genetic-by-age interactions (7 loci for obesity traits, 26 for pulse pressure, few to none for lipids). Our cross-trait view reveals trait-specificity regarding the proportion of loci with age-modulated effects, which is particularly high for pulse pressure. Testing the 44 variants in longitudinal data (up to 50,000 individuals), we observe significant effects on change for obesity traits (near APOE, TMEM18, TFAP2B) and pulse pressure (near FBN1, IGFBP3; known for implication in arterial stiffness processes).

Conclusions: We provide analytical and empirical evidence that cross-sectional genetic-by-age interaction can help pinpoint longitudinal-change effects, when cross-sectional data surpasses longitudinal sample size. Our findings shed light on the distinction between traits that are impacted by age-dependent genetic effects and those that are not.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国生物库中复杂性状的年龄遗传相互作用分析及其对纵向性状变化的潜在影响。
背景:全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经在横断面数据中确定了数千个与疾病相关的人类性状的基因座。然而,年龄对遗传效应的影响尚未得到充分承认。此外,由于纵向数据样本量小,确定遗传对纵向性状变化的影响一直受到阻碍。随着时间的推移或疾病进展,这种对恶化的性状水平的影响可能具有临床相关性。结果:在一定的假设下,我们分析证明,在横断面数据中观察到的遗传-年龄相互作用可以指示纵向性状变化的遗传关联。我们提出了一种两阶段的方法,即在横断面数据中对基因年龄相互作用进行全基因组预筛选,并在独立的纵向数据中对已确定的变异进行纵向变化测试。在UK Biobank的横断面数据中,我们分析了8个复杂的特征(多达37万人)。我们确定了44个基因与年龄的相互作用(7个基因座与肥胖性状有关,26个基因座与脉压有关,很少或没有与脂质有关)。我们的交叉性状观点揭示了具有年龄调节效应的基因座比例的性状特异性,这在脉压方面尤其高。在纵向数据中测试44个变异(多达50,000个个体),我们观察到对肥胖性状(APOE, TMEM18, TFAP2B附近)和脉压(FBN1附近,IGFBP3;以与动脉硬化过程相关而闻名)。结论:我们提供的分析和经验证据表明,当横断面数据超过纵向样本量时,横断面遗传-年龄相互作用可以帮助确定纵向变化效应。我们的发现揭示了受年龄依赖的遗传效应影响的性状和不受年龄依赖的性状之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Biology is a leading research journal that focuses on the study of biology and biomedicine from a genomic and post-genomic standpoint. The journal consistently publishes outstanding research across various areas within these fields. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022), Genome Biology has earned its place as the 3rd highest-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category, according to Thomson Reuters. Additionally, it is ranked 2nd among research journals in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category. It is important to note that Genome Biology is the top-ranking open access journal in this category. In summary, Genome Biology sets a high standard for scientific publications in the field, showcasing cutting-edge research and earning recognition among its peers.
期刊最新文献
Genetic-by-age interaction analyses on complex traits in UK Biobank and their potential to identify effects on longitudinal trait change. Cohesin distribution alone predicts chromatin organization in yeast via conserved-current loop extrusion. DeepKINET: a deep generative model for estimating single-cell RNA splicing and degradation rates. Seqrutinator: scrutiny of large protein superfamily sequence datasets for the identification and elimination of non-functional homologues. Systemic interindividual DNA methylation variants in cattle share major hallmarks with those in humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1