Exploration of What Pediatric Residents Find Most Helpful From Their Programs in Facilitating Well-Being.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2024.102607
Nimisha Bajaj, Suzanne M Reed, Ross E Myers, John D Mahan, Keith Ponitz
{"title":"Exploration of What Pediatric Residents Find Most Helpful From Their Programs in Facilitating Well-Being.","authors":"Nimisha Bajaj, Suzanne M Reed, Ross E Myers, John D Mahan, Keith Ponitz","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Burnout is highly prevalent among residents, and although many studied interventions have targeted burnout by trying to promote well-being, it remains a substantial problem. This study utilized data from the Pediatric Resident Burnout-Resilience Study Consortium (PRB-RSC) Annual Burnout Survey to determine which program interventions categorical and noncategorical (medicine-pediatrics and combined programs) pediatric residents found most helpful to promote well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of an open-ended question on the PRB-RSC Annual Burnout Survey in 2019 and 2020: \"What is the most helpful thing that your program provides you for wellness?\" We performed thematic and content analysis on open-ended responses and compared distribution of themes and subthemes between years using a Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, 1401 (44%) of 3159 residents from 44 programs responded to the open-ended question, with 771 (49%) of 1563 residents from 21 programs responding in 2020. Residents found wellness interventions within 5 themes to be the most helpful. Promotes positive work environment and Optimizes scheduling were mentioned most frequently, but residents also valued when a program Facilitates traditional wellness interventions, Offers financial benefits, and Prioritizes education. Themes and subthemes were mentioned with the same frequency in both 2019 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show which institutional interventions residents have found to be most helpful to their well-being. Program leaders can use these data as a framework to discuss interventions with their residents, allowing them to tailor wellness programs and use limited available resources for what residents believe is most impactful.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Burnout is highly prevalent among residents, and although many studied interventions have targeted burnout by trying to promote well-being, it remains a substantial problem. This study utilized data from the Pediatric Resident Burnout-Resilience Study Consortium (PRB-RSC) Annual Burnout Survey to determine which program interventions categorical and noncategorical (medicine-pediatrics and combined programs) pediatric residents found most helpful to promote well-being.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of an open-ended question on the PRB-RSC Annual Burnout Survey in 2019 and 2020: "What is the most helpful thing that your program provides you for wellness?" We performed thematic and content analysis on open-ended responses and compared distribution of themes and subthemes between years using a Chi-square test.

Results: In 2019, 1401 (44%) of 3159 residents from 44 programs responded to the open-ended question, with 771 (49%) of 1563 residents from 21 programs responding in 2020. Residents found wellness interventions within 5 themes to be the most helpful. Promotes positive work environment and Optimizes scheduling were mentioned most frequently, but residents also valued when a program Facilitates traditional wellness interventions, Offers financial benefits, and Prioritizes education. Themes and subthemes were mentioned with the same frequency in both 2019 and 2020.

Conclusions: The results of this study show which institutional interventions residents have found to be most helpful to their well-being. Program leaders can use these data as a framework to discuss interventions with their residents, allowing them to tailor wellness programs and use limited available resources for what residents believe is most impactful.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索儿科住院医师在促进健康方面从他们的项目中发现最有帮助的东西。
目的:职业倦怠在居民中非常普遍,尽管许多研究干预措施都试图通过促进幸福感来针对职业倦怠,但它仍然是一个实质性的问题。本研究利用了来自儿科住院医师倦怠-弹性研究联盟(PRB-RSC)年度倦怠调查的数据,以确定儿科住院医师认为哪些项目干预(分类和非分类(医学-儿科和联合项目))对促进健康最有帮助。方法:我们对2019年和2020年PRB-RSC年度职业倦怠调查中的一个开放式问题进行了二次分析:“你的项目为你的健康提供的最有帮助的东西是什么?”我们对开放式回答进行了主题和内容分析,并使用卡方检验比较了不同年份主题和副主题的分布。结果:2019年,来自44个项目的3159名居民中有1401人(44%)回答了开放式问题,2020年,来自21个项目的1563名居民中有771人(49%)回答了这个问题。居民们发现五个主题内的健康干预是最有帮助的。促进积极的工作环境和优化日程安排是最常提到的,但当一个项目促进传统的健康干预、提供经济利益和优先考虑教育时,居民也会重视。2019年和2020年,主题和副主题的提及频率相同。结论:本研究的结果显示了哪些机构干预措施对居民的幸福感最有帮助。项目负责人可以使用这些数据作为框架,与居民讨论干预措施,使他们能够定制健康计划,并将有限的可用资源用于居民认为最具影响力的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
Simulation-based training improves developmental hip dysplasia examination and diagnosis skills on newborns. Use of "Bug-in-the-Ear" Technology in Improving Pediatric Residents' Skills in Diagnosis and Treatment of ADHD. Youth Survivors of Human Trafficking: On Improving Healthcare Access and Treatment. "And Still We Rise: Advances in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Antiracism in Academic Pediatrics". Goals of Care Discussion Characteristics and Disparities in Children with Medical Complexity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1