Exploring the breadth of medicine: 8-year outcomes of a brief clinical summer immersion for premedical students.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06301-5
Eva Weinlander, Elizabeth Sams, Sarita Khemani, Armaan Jamal, Malathi Srinivasan
{"title":"Exploring the breadth of medicine: 8-year outcomes of a brief clinical summer immersion for premedical students.","authors":"Eva Weinlander, Elizabeth Sams, Sarita Khemani, Armaan Jamal, Malathi Srinivasan","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06301-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to the breadth of healthcare opportunities is crucial to high-school and college students considering a career in medicine. Most programs revolve around research or subspecialties, limiting exposure to the richness within medicine.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a program evaluation of the Stanford Clinical Summer Internship (CSI) 2-week program, to understand learner viewpoints around CSI program utility, and to assess long term impact. We assess viewpoints by learner level (high school versus college) and participation mode (in-person versus virtual).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2016 we launched a two-week premedical internship, incorporating AAMC core competencies. In 2022 and 2023, we surveyed past participants, collecting demographic data and evaluating/comparing CSI's impact on educational and career paths, future preferences in healthcare careers, and influential factors of matriculation for high-school and college participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 411 past participants, 42% responded (n = 173). We found minimal significant differences between high school and college students. The primary reason for joining was exploring a career in health professions. Notably, 82% acknowledged Stanford-CSI broadened their medical perspectives, 79% gained clarity on healthcare professionals' daily life, 79% heightened their interest in healthcare careers, 71% enhanced their resumes, and 72% learned valuable clinical skills. In-person participants reported developing more friendships (agree/strongly agree: 60% vs 35%, unpaired t-test: p = 0.01), while virtual participants reported having more interest in research careers (40% vs 68%, p = 0.01). Amongst high school matriculants (n = 133), 46% are now in college and 4% in medical or nursing school. Amongst collegiate matriculants (n = 40), 89% have graduated and 11% are now in graduate or medical school. All respondents believed Stanford-CSI was a worthwhile investment of time and resources, with nearly all reporting subsequent increased interest in medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stanford-CSI's summer internship gives premedical students real-world medical profession exposure and fosters meaningful connections. Our findings and teaching framework can guide similar program developments, supporting future medical education initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"1387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06301-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exposure to the breadth of healthcare opportunities is crucial to high-school and college students considering a career in medicine. Most programs revolve around research or subspecialties, limiting exposure to the richness within medicine.

Objective: We conducted a program evaluation of the Stanford Clinical Summer Internship (CSI) 2-week program, to understand learner viewpoints around CSI program utility, and to assess long term impact. We assess viewpoints by learner level (high school versus college) and participation mode (in-person versus virtual).

Methods: In 2016 we launched a two-week premedical internship, incorporating AAMC core competencies. In 2022 and 2023, we surveyed past participants, collecting demographic data and evaluating/comparing CSI's impact on educational and career paths, future preferences in healthcare careers, and influential factors of matriculation for high-school and college participants.

Results: Of 411 past participants, 42% responded (n = 173). We found minimal significant differences between high school and college students. The primary reason for joining was exploring a career in health professions. Notably, 82% acknowledged Stanford-CSI broadened their medical perspectives, 79% gained clarity on healthcare professionals' daily life, 79% heightened their interest in healthcare careers, 71% enhanced their resumes, and 72% learned valuable clinical skills. In-person participants reported developing more friendships (agree/strongly agree: 60% vs 35%, unpaired t-test: p = 0.01), while virtual participants reported having more interest in research careers (40% vs 68%, p = 0.01). Amongst high school matriculants (n = 133), 46% are now in college and 4% in medical or nursing school. Amongst collegiate matriculants (n = 40), 89% have graduated and 11% are now in graduate or medical school. All respondents believed Stanford-CSI was a worthwhile investment of time and resources, with nearly all reporting subsequent increased interest in medicine.

Conclusions: Stanford-CSI's summer internship gives premedical students real-world medical profession exposure and fosters meaningful connections. Our findings and teaching framework can guide similar program developments, supporting future medical education initiatives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索医学的广度:医学预科学生短暂临床暑期浸入式学习的8年结果。
背景:接触广泛的医疗保健机会对考虑从事医学职业的高中生和大学生至关重要。大多数课程都围绕研究或亚专业展开,限制了接触医学的丰富内容。目的:对为期两周的斯坦福临床暑期实习(CSI)项目进行评估,了解学员对CSI项目效用的看法,并评估其长期影响。我们根据学习者水平(高中与大学)和参与模式(面对面与虚拟)来评估观点。方法:2016年开展为期两周的医前实习,融入AAMC核心能力。在2022年和2023年,我们对过去的参与者进行了调查,收集了人口统计数据,并评估/比较了CSI对高中和大学参与者的教育和职业道路、未来医疗保健职业偏好以及入学影响因素的影响。结果:在411名过去的参与者中,42%的人有反应(n = 173)。我们发现高中生和大学生之间的差异微乎其微。加入的主要原因是探索在卫生专业的职业生涯。值得注意的是,82%的人承认斯坦福csi拓宽了他们的医学视野,79%的人对医疗保健专业人员的日常生活有了清晰的了解,79%的人提高了他们对医疗保健职业的兴趣,71%的人充实了他们的简历,72%的人学到了宝贵的临床技能。面对面的参与者报告说发展了更多的友谊(同意/非常同意:60%对35%,未配对t检验:p = 0.01),而虚拟参与者报告说对研究事业更感兴趣(40%对68%,p = 0.01)。在高中毕业生中(133人),目前有46%进入大学,4%进入医学院或护理学校。在大学毕业生中(40人),89%已经毕业,11%正在研究生院或医学院就读。所有受访者都认为斯坦福- csi是值得投入时间和资源的,几乎所有人都表示随后对医学的兴趣增加了。结论:斯坦福- csi的暑期实习让医学预科学生接触到真实的医学专业,并培养了有意义的联系。我们的研究结果和教学框架可以指导类似项目的发展,支持未来的医学教育举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Voices of learners: a qualitative exploration of nursing students' satisfaction with simulation-based basic life support training. Diagnostic imaging interpretation by physical therapists: a clinical performance evaluation. Readiness for self-directed learning among first-year medical and nursing students at the Arabian Gulf University in Bahrain. The spectrum of somatic and psychological distress: a novel cross-disciplinary analysis of medical and non-medical students in the academic landscape. Effectiveness of a case-based learning combined with flipped classroom approach in undergraduate pulmonary imaging education: a prospective randomized controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1