Olivia Aspiras, Hollis Hutchings, Anurag Dawadi, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Ikenna C Okereke, Todd Lucas
{"title":"Medical mistrust and receptivity to lung cancer screening among African American and white American smokers.","authors":"Olivia Aspiras, Hollis Hutchings, Anurag Dawadi, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Ikenna C Okereke, Todd Lucas","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although medical mistrust is associated with lower cancer screening uptake among racial minorities, such as African Americans, potential impacts on cancer screening among White Americans are generally understudied. In this study, we examined links from medical mistrust to lung cancer screening among African American (<i>N</i> = 203) and White American (<i>N</i> = 201) smokers. Participants completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale and viewed a brief online educational module about lung cancer risks, etiology, and screening. Thereafter, participants reported their receptivity to lung cancer screening using a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measurement framework (attitudes, normative beliefs, perceived control, and intentions). Medical mistrust predicted lower screening receptivity across all TPB measures for both racial groups. Although medical mistrust was higher among African Americans, there were no race differences in screening receptivity. However, there was some evidence that race moderates the relationship between medical mistrust and screening attitudes. While greater mistrust predicted more negative attitudes among both races, this effect was stronger among White Americans than African Americans. Findings suggest that group-based medical mistrust is a barrier to lung cancer screening for both African Americans and White Americans and illustrates the need to address medical mistrust as a barrier to screening for both racial minority and nonminority populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2430889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although medical mistrust is associated with lower cancer screening uptake among racial minorities, such as African Americans, potential impacts on cancer screening among White Americans are generally understudied. In this study, we examined links from medical mistrust to lung cancer screening among African American (N = 203) and White American (N = 201) smokers. Participants completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale and viewed a brief online educational module about lung cancer risks, etiology, and screening. Thereafter, participants reported their receptivity to lung cancer screening using a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measurement framework (attitudes, normative beliefs, perceived control, and intentions). Medical mistrust predicted lower screening receptivity across all TPB measures for both racial groups. Although medical mistrust was higher among African Americans, there were no race differences in screening receptivity. However, there was some evidence that race moderates the relationship between medical mistrust and screening attitudes. While greater mistrust predicted more negative attitudes among both races, this effect was stronger among White Americans than African Americans. Findings suggest that group-based medical mistrust is a barrier to lung cancer screening for both African Americans and White Americans and illustrates the need to address medical mistrust as a barrier to screening for both racial minority and nonminority populations.
期刊介绍:
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.