Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05129-1
Kexin Wang, Liangshan Wang, Jiawang Ma, Haixiu Xie, Chenglong Li, Xing Hao, Zhongtao Du, Hong Wang, Xiaotong Hou
{"title":"Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry","authors":"Kexin Wang, Liangshan Wang, Jiawang Ma, Haixiu Xie, Chenglong Li, Xing Hao, Zhongtao Du, Hong Wang, Xiaotong Hou","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05129-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of applying IABP for left ventricle (LV) unloading after VA-ECMO on reducing mortality in patients with CS. Data from 5,492 consecutive patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO between January 2017 and July 2023 were collected from the CSECLS registry. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, survival on VA-ECMO, and various complications. The association between the application of IABP after VA-ECMO and in-hospital outcomes was assessed. Among 5,492 patients undergoing VA-ECMO (mean age 54.7 ± 15.1 years, 3,917 [71.3%] male), 832 (15.1%) received IABP after VA-ECMO. Before VA-ECMO, a higher incidence of cardiac intervention (13.9% vs. 16.7%) and myocardial infarction (12.0% vs. 14.8%) (all P < 0.05) was seen in the IABP after VA-ECMO group. In this cohort, the IABP after VA-ECMO group had a lower in-hospital mortality (52.5% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.017) and a higher survival rate on VA-ECMO (75.4% vs. 79.4%, P = 0.014). On multivariate modeling, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio[aOR], 0.823 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.686–0.987]; P = 0.035) and on-support mortality (aOR, 0.828 [95% CI, 0.688–0.995]; P = 0.044). However, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was also associated with an increased incidence of complications, including mechanical (aOR: 1.905, [95% CI, 1.278–2.839]; P = 0.002), bleeding (aOR: 1.371, [95% CI, 1.092–1.721]; P = 0.007), renal (aOR: 1.252, [95% CI, 1.041–1.505]; P = 0.017), and pulmonary (aOR: 1.768, [95% CI, 1.446–2.163]; P < 0.001). In this multicenter retrospective study, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with CS. These findings suggest that IABP may offer advantages for LV unloading in patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO, but further validation through randomized controlled trials is warranted to better understand the balance of risks and benefits.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05129-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of applying IABP for left ventricle (LV) unloading after VA-ECMO on reducing mortality in patients with CS. Data from 5,492 consecutive patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO between January 2017 and July 2023 were collected from the CSECLS registry. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, survival on VA-ECMO, and various complications. The association between the application of IABP after VA-ECMO and in-hospital outcomes was assessed. Among 5,492 patients undergoing VA-ECMO (mean age 54.7 ± 15.1 years, 3,917 [71.3%] male), 832 (15.1%) received IABP after VA-ECMO. Before VA-ECMO, a higher incidence of cardiac intervention (13.9% vs. 16.7%) and myocardial infarction (12.0% vs. 14.8%) (all P < 0.05) was seen in the IABP after VA-ECMO group. In this cohort, the IABP after VA-ECMO group had a lower in-hospital mortality (52.5% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.017) and a higher survival rate on VA-ECMO (75.4% vs. 79.4%, P = 0.014). On multivariate modeling, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio[aOR], 0.823 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.686–0.987]; P = 0.035) and on-support mortality (aOR, 0.828 [95% CI, 0.688–0.995]; P = 0.044). However, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was also associated with an increased incidence of complications, including mechanical (aOR: 1.905, [95% CI, 1.278–2.839]; P = 0.002), bleeding (aOR: 1.371, [95% CI, 1.092–1.721]; P = 0.007), renal (aOR: 1.252, [95% CI, 1.041–1.505]; P = 0.017), and pulmonary (aOR: 1.768, [95% CI, 1.446–2.163]; P < 0.001). In this multicenter retrospective study, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with CS. These findings suggest that IABP may offer advantages for LV unloading in patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO, but further validation through randomized controlled trials is warranted to better understand the balance of risks and benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VA-ECMO后主动脉内球囊泵可降低心源性休克患者的死亡率:中国体外生命支持登记的分析
主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)联合静脉-体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)在心源性休克(CS)患者中的作用尚不清楚。本研究探讨了在VA-ECMO后应用IABP进行左心室卸荷对降低CS患者死亡率的影响。2017年1月至2023年7月,从CSECLS登记处收集了5492例连续接受VA-ECMO治疗的CS患者的数据。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结局包括30天死亡率、VA-ECMO存活和各种并发症。评估VA-ECMO后应用IABP与院内预后之间的关系。5492例VA-ECMO患者(平均年龄54.7±15.1岁,男性3917例(71.3%)),832例(15.1%)VA-ECMO后接受IABP。VA-ECMO后IABP组心脏干预发生率(13.9% vs. 16.7%)和心肌梗死发生率(12.0% vs. 14.8%)高于VA-ECMO前组(均P < 0.05)。在该队列中,VA-ECMO后IABP组的住院死亡率较低(52.5%比48.0%,P = 0.017), VA-ECMO组的生存率较高(75.4%比79.4%,P = 0.014)。在多变量建模中,VA-ECMO后使用IABP与较低的院内死亡风险相关(调整优势比[aOR], 0.823[95%可信区间[CI], 0.686-0.987];P = 0.035)和非支持死亡率(aOR, 0.828 [95% CI, 0.688-0.995];p = 0.044)。然而,在VA-ECMO后使用IABP也与并发症的发生率增加相关,包括机械性并发症(aOR: 1.905, [95% CI, 1.278-2.839];P = 0.002),出血(优势比:1.371 (95% CI, 1.092 - -1.721);P = 0.007),肾(优势比:1.252 (95% CI, 1.041 - -1.505);P = 0.017),肺部(aOR: 1.768, [95% CI, 1.446-2.163];p < 0.001)。在这项多中心回顾性研究中,VA-ECMO后使用IABP与CS患者较低的住院死亡率相关。这些研究结果表明,IABP可能对接受VA-ECMO治疗的CS患者的左室卸载有优势,但需要通过随机对照试验进一步验证,以更好地了解风险和收益的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing cultural competence and communication in ICU: addressing family conflicts Ulinastatin treatment mitigates glycocalyx degradation and associated with lower postoperative delirium risk in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a multicentre observational study Association of healthy sleep patterns with incident sepsis: a large population-based prospective cohort study Heterogeneity of treatment effect: the case for individualising oxygen therapy in critically ill patients Effect of early administration of fibrinogen replacement therapy in traumatic haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with narrative synthesis of observational studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1