Exploring Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Diet Quality in the Context of Popular Low Carbohydrate and Plant-Based Dietary Approaches

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Science & Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1002/fsn3.4496
Kayla-Anne Lenferna De La Motte, Jessica L. Campbell, Caryn Zinn
{"title":"Exploring Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Diet Quality in the Context of Popular Low Carbohydrate and Plant-Based Dietary Approaches","authors":"Kayla-Anne Lenferna De La Motte,&nbsp;Jessica L. Campbell,&nbsp;Caryn Zinn","doi":"10.1002/fsn3.4496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates diet quality across four popular dietary patterns: Ketogenic Diet, Low-Carbohydrate Healthy-Fat, Vegetarian, and Vegan, employing the NOVA and Human Interference Scoring System (HISS) classification systems. Utilizing a modified Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and analyzing 168 participants' dietary habits, the research identifies notable differences in dietary quality among the dietary patterns. While all groups reported lower consumption of UPFs than the general population, plant-based diets demonstrated higher UPF consumption than ketogenic and low carbohydrate diets. The study reveals that both NOVA and HISS effectively identify UPFs, with significant differences observed at various processing levels, except for UPFs where both systems showed similarity. This research contributes to the detailed understanding of diet quality within popular dietary patterns, highlighting the importance of considering food processing in dietary choices and the need for ongoing research to further elucidate the health implications of different types of UPFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12418,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"12 11","pages":"9651-9663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.4496","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.4496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates diet quality across four popular dietary patterns: Ketogenic Diet, Low-Carbohydrate Healthy-Fat, Vegetarian, and Vegan, employing the NOVA and Human Interference Scoring System (HISS) classification systems. Utilizing a modified Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and analyzing 168 participants' dietary habits, the research identifies notable differences in dietary quality among the dietary patterns. While all groups reported lower consumption of UPFs than the general population, plant-based diets demonstrated higher UPF consumption than ketogenic and low carbohydrate diets. The study reveals that both NOVA and HISS effectively identify UPFs, with significant differences observed at various processing levels, except for UPFs where both systems showed similarity. This research contributes to the detailed understanding of diet quality within popular dietary patterns, highlighting the importance of considering food processing in dietary choices and the need for ongoing research to further elucidate the health implications of different types of UPFs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在流行的低碳水化合物和植物性饮食方法的背景下,探索超加工食品的消费和饮食质量
本研究采用NOVA和人为干扰评分系统(HISS)分类系统,调查了四种流行的饮食模式的饮食质量:生酮饮食、低碳水化合物健康脂肪饮食、素食和纯素食。利用改进的食物频率问卷(FFQ),分析168名参与者的饮食习惯,研究发现不同饮食模式的饮食质量存在显著差异。虽然所有组的UPF摄入量都低于一般人群,但植物性饮食比生酮饮食和低碳水化合物饮食显示出更高的UPF摄入量。研究表明,NOVA和HISS都能有效地识别upf,在不同的处理水平上观察到显著的差异,除了两个系统显示相似的upf。这项研究有助于详细了解流行饮食模式中的饮食质量,突出了在饮食选择中考虑食品加工的重要性,以及需要进行持续研究以进一步阐明不同类型的upf对健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science & Nutrition
Food Science & Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
434
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science & Nutrition is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of food science and nutrition. The Journal will consider submissions of quality papers describing the results of fundamental and applied research related to all aspects of human food and nutrition, as well as interdisciplinary research that spans these two fields.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Phytochemical Profiling and Wound Healing Potential of Scabiosa pseudograminifolia Hub.-Mor. and Scabiosa hololeuca Bornm.: UHPLC-HRMS/MS Analysis and Fibroblast-Based Evaluation. Cultivated Meat and the Future of Food Systems: Promise, Progress, and Challenges. Preservation Strategies for Camel Meat: Quality Improvement and Shelf-Life Extension. Phytochemical Diversity, Nutritional Values, and Biological Properties of Halopithys incurva (Hudson) Batters, 1902. A Systematic Review on Chinese Baijiu Aging Process in Cellular Built Environment: States, Challenges, and Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1