Causal roles of dietary structure and types on prostate cancer risk: A mendelian randomization study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13252-z
Chengyong Li, Zhinan Jing, Qiang Guo, Zhanlong Zheng, Xingming Zhao, Weijun Yuan, Yujia Xi, Jingqi Wang
{"title":"Causal roles of dietary structure and types on prostate cancer risk: A mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Chengyong Li, Zhinan Jing, Qiang Guo, Zhanlong Zheng, Xingming Zhao, Weijun Yuan, Yujia Xi, Jingqi Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13252-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous observational studies have reported a strong link between dietary habits and the risk of prostate cancer. However, these studies are susceptible to confounding factors. To address this question, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship between dietary habits and prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic data for 25 different diet types were obtained from UK Biobank. Summary-level data on dietary composition and prostate cancer were obtained from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). We employed the inverse variance weighted (IVW) for the primary analysis to examine the causal relationship between dietary components, dietary types, and prostate cancer. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using the Steiger filter, MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q statistic, funnel plot, and leave-one-out analysis were used for sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>IVW results showed that relative fat intake (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.33-1.00, P < 0.05) and canned tomato intake (OR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.60 ~ 0.87, P < 0.01) and green bean intake (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.74 ~ 0.98, P = 0.03) may be protective factors for prostate cancer. In contrast, relative sugar intake (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-2.00, P = 0.03) may increase the risk of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative fat intake, green bean intake, and canned tomato intake may have a protective causal effect against prostate cancer, while relative sugar intake may increase the risk of prostate cancer. R These insights have implications for developing prevention strategies and interventions targeting dietary intake to prevent prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13252-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous observational studies have reported a strong link between dietary habits and the risk of prostate cancer. However, these studies are susceptible to confounding factors. To address this question, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship between dietary habits and prostate cancer.

Methods: Genetic data for 25 different diet types were obtained from UK Biobank. Summary-level data on dietary composition and prostate cancer were obtained from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). We employed the inverse variance weighted (IVW) for the primary analysis to examine the causal relationship between dietary components, dietary types, and prostate cancer. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using the Steiger filter, MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q statistic, funnel plot, and leave-one-out analysis were used for sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings.

Result: IVW results showed that relative fat intake (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.33-1.00, P < 0.05) and canned tomato intake (OR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.60 ~ 0.87, P < 0.01) and green bean intake (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.74 ~ 0.98, P = 0.03) may be protective factors for prostate cancer. In contrast, relative sugar intake (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-2.00, P = 0.03) may increase the risk of prostate cancer.

Conclusions: Relative fat intake, green bean intake, and canned tomato intake may have a protective causal effect against prostate cancer, while relative sugar intake may increase the risk of prostate cancer. R These insights have implications for developing prevention strategies and interventions targeting dietary intake to prevent prostate cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning based on alcohol drinking-gut microbiota-liver axis in predicting the occurrence of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Prognostic nutritional index is an independent risk factor for continuing S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. Use of inpatient systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and related predictive factors, healthcare resource utilization, and direct hospitalization costs for metastatic urothelial cancer: findings from a real-world retrospective observational study derived from the national hospital discharge claims database in Italy. Validation of two predictive models for survival in anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). Causal roles of dietary structure and types on prostate cancer risk: A mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1