Sick and detached: Does experimental inflammation impact on movement synchrony in humans?

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.11.028
Vera Flasbeck , Fabian T. Ramseyer , Manfred Schedlowski , Harald Engler , Martin Brüne
{"title":"Sick and detached: Does experimental inflammation impact on movement synchrony in humans?","authors":"Vera Flasbeck ,&nbsp;Fabian T. Ramseyer ,&nbsp;Manfred Schedlowski ,&nbsp;Harald Engler ,&nbsp;Martin Brüne","doi":"10.1016/j.bbi.2024.11.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpersonal connectedness is a central feature of human interaction that can be compromised during illness. Nonverbal signals play a crucial role in this context, and humans, like other animals, have evolved a behavioral immune system that enables individuals to detect subtle cues of sickness in others. Conversely, sick individuals often tend to avoid social interaction, a key component of sickness behavior. The coordination of body movements between two individuals (movement synchrony) is a measure of the quality of relationships that could provide insights into an interlocutor’s sickness state. In the present study, we explored the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration, a naturalistic stimulus for inflammation-induced sickness, on movement synchrony in healthy volunteers randomly assigned to a double-blind interview with a non-treated interviewer conducted 2.5 h after intravenous injection of either LPS (N = 26) or placebo (N = 25). Movement synchrony was assessed by automated video analysis of subject’s and interviewer’s head movements. Lagged cross-correlations were used to objectively quantify coordination in dyads and to assess patterns of temporal movement synchronization. Data analysis revealed that dyads with subjects under placebo displayed a pattern of movement coordination comparable to that seen in previous studies. However, dyads with subjects under LPS showed a loss of simultaneous movement (i.e. moving at the same time) with the interview partner, which is normally the temporal domain providing the highest level of synchrony. Together, the findings suggest that immediate social interaction is attenuated when one interlocutor is exposed to systemic inflammation, while the other is unaffected. This effect can be attributed to both sickness behavior on one hand and correlates of the behavioral immune system on the other hand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9199,"journal":{"name":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 157-162"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159124007104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpersonal connectedness is a central feature of human interaction that can be compromised during illness. Nonverbal signals play a crucial role in this context, and humans, like other animals, have evolved a behavioral immune system that enables individuals to detect subtle cues of sickness in others. Conversely, sick individuals often tend to avoid social interaction, a key component of sickness behavior. The coordination of body movements between two individuals (movement synchrony) is a measure of the quality of relationships that could provide insights into an interlocutor’s sickness state. In the present study, we explored the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration, a naturalistic stimulus for inflammation-induced sickness, on movement synchrony in healthy volunteers randomly assigned to a double-blind interview with a non-treated interviewer conducted 2.5 h after intravenous injection of either LPS (N = 26) or placebo (N = 25). Movement synchrony was assessed by automated video analysis of subject’s and interviewer’s head movements. Lagged cross-correlations were used to objectively quantify coordination in dyads and to assess patterns of temporal movement synchronization. Data analysis revealed that dyads with subjects under placebo displayed a pattern of movement coordination comparable to that seen in previous studies. However, dyads with subjects under LPS showed a loss of simultaneous movement (i.e. moving at the same time) with the interview partner, which is normally the temporal domain providing the highest level of synchrony. Together, the findings suggest that immediate social interaction is attenuated when one interlocutor is exposed to systemic inflammation, while the other is unaffected. This effect can be attributed to both sickness behavior on one hand and correlates of the behavioral immune system on the other hand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生病和分离:实验性炎症是否影响人类的运动同步?
人际联系是人际交往的核心特征,在疾病期间可能会受到损害。在这种情况下,非语言信号起着至关重要的作用,人类和其他动物一样,已经进化出一种行为免疫系统,使个体能够察觉到他人疾病的细微迹象。相反,生病的人往往倾向于避免社交互动,这是生病行为的一个关键组成部分。两个人之间身体动作的协调性(动作同步)是衡量关系质量的一种标准,可以洞察对话者的疾病状态。在本研究中,我们探讨了脂多糖(LPS)管理对运动同步的影响,这是一种炎症引起的疾病的自然刺激,在健康志愿者中随机分配到一组双盲访谈,在静脉注射LPS( = 26)或安慰剂( = 25)后2.5 h进行未治疗的访谈者。通过对受试者和采访者头部运动的自动视频分析来评估运动同步性。滞后相互关联被用来客观地量化二组的协调,并评估时间运动同步的模式。数据分析显示,服用安慰剂的二人组表现出的运动协调模式与之前的研究相似。然而,LPS下的二人组表现出与采访伙伴同时运动(即同时运动)的丧失,而这通常是提供最高水平同步性的时间域。总之,研究结果表明,当对话者中的一方暴露于全身炎症时,直接的社会互动就会减弱,而另一方则不受影响。这种影响一方面可以归因于疾病行为,另一方面归因于行为免疫系统的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1987, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity proudly serves as the official journal of the Psychoneuroimmunology Research Society (PNIRS). This pioneering journal is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed basic, experimental, and clinical studies that explore the intricate interactions among behavioral, neural, endocrine, and immune systems in both humans and animals. As an international and interdisciplinary platform, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity focuses on original research spanning neuroscience, immunology, integrative physiology, behavioral biology, psychiatry, psychology, and clinical medicine. The journal is inclusive of research conducted at various levels, including molecular, cellular, social, and whole organism perspectives. With a commitment to efficiency, the journal facilitates online submission and review, ensuring timely publication of experimental results. Manuscripts typically undergo peer review and are returned to authors within 30 days of submission. It's worth noting that Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, published eight times a year, does not impose submission fees or page charges, fostering an open and accessible platform for scientific discourse.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Ezrin-mediated astrocyte-synapse signaling regulates cognitive function via astrocyte morphological changes in fine processes in male mice Minimally invasive serial collection of cerebrospinal fluid reveals sex-dependent differences in neuroinflammation in a rat model of mild traumatic brain injury Peripartum buprenorphine and oxycodone exposure impair maternal behavior and increase neuroinflammation in new mother rats Sick and detached: Does experimental inflammation impact on movement synchrony in humans?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1