Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing registry analysis.
Nidhi Iyanna, Umar Nasim, Ander Dorken-Gallastegi, Nicholas R Hess, Mohamed Abdullah, Gavin W Hickey, Mary E Keebler, Edward T Horn, Yeahwa Hong, David J Kaczorowski
{"title":"Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing registry analysis.","authors":"Nidhi Iyanna, Umar Nasim, Ander Dorken-Gallastegi, Nicholas R Hess, Mohamed Abdullah, Gavin W Hickey, Mary E Keebler, Edward T Horn, Yeahwa Hong, David J Kaczorowski","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The criteria for evaluating donations after circulatory death (DCD) heart allografts, particularly donor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) status, remains underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of donor CPR on post-transplant outcomes in DCD heart transplants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019 and 3/31/2023, with a 1-year follow-up period extending to 3/31/2024. Primary outcomes were 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survival. 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed. Restricted cubic spline was used to model duration of CPR and likelihood of 1-year post-transplant mortality. Sub-analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of CPR duration on donor heart utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 683 DCD recipients were included, and 378 recipients (55.3%) received hearts from donors that underwent CPR. Recipients with donors who received CPR had similar 1-year (92.1% vs 90.7%) post-transplant survival compared to recipients with donors who did not receive CPR. The comparable post-transplant survival persisted in a propensity score-matched comparison. The spline model demonstrated that longer duration of CPR was not associated with lower odds of 1-year post-transplant survival compared to the reference of 15 minutes. In the sub-analysis, longer CPR duration was not significantly associated with reduced donor heart utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Donors that received CPR requires consideration for DCD transplants since damage during cardiac arrest prior to withdrawal of life support may amplify warm ischemic injury during procurement. This study suggests that the use of DCD hearts that underwent CPR can expand the donor pool without compromising early post-transplant survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The criteria for evaluating donations after circulatory death (DCD) heart allografts, particularly donor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) status, remains underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of donor CPR on post-transplant outcomes in DCD heart transplants.
Methods: The UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019 and 3/31/2023, with a 1-year follow-up period extending to 3/31/2024. Primary outcomes were 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survival. 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed. Restricted cubic spline was used to model duration of CPR and likelihood of 1-year post-transplant mortality. Sub-analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of CPR duration on donor heart utilization.
Results: A total of 683 DCD recipients were included, and 378 recipients (55.3%) received hearts from donors that underwent CPR. Recipients with donors who received CPR had similar 1-year (92.1% vs 90.7%) post-transplant survival compared to recipients with donors who did not receive CPR. The comparable post-transplant survival persisted in a propensity score-matched comparison. The spline model demonstrated that longer duration of CPR was not associated with lower odds of 1-year post-transplant survival compared to the reference of 15 minutes. In the sub-analysis, longer CPR duration was not significantly associated with reduced donor heart utilization.
Conclusions: Donors that received CPR requires consideration for DCD transplants since damage during cardiac arrest prior to withdrawal of life support may amplify warm ischemic injury during procurement. This study suggests that the use of DCD hearts that underwent CPR can expand the donor pool without compromising early post-transplant survival.
背景:评估循环死亡(DCD)心脏移植后供体的标准,特别是供体心肺复苏(CPR)状态,仍未得到充分探讨。本研究评估供体CPR对DCD心脏移植术后预后的影响。方法:查询UNOS注册表,分析2019年1月1日至2023年3月31日期间接受DCD心脏移植的成人受者,随访1年至2024年3月31日。主要结局是移植后90天和1年的生存。进行1:1倾向评分匹配。限制三次样条用于模拟心肺复苏持续时间和移植后1年死亡率的可能性。进行亚分析以评估心肺复苏术持续时间对供体心脏利用率的影响。结果:共纳入683名DCD受者,378名受者(55.3%)接受了接受心肺复苏术的供者的心脏。与未接受心肺复苏术的受者相比,接受过心肺复苏术的受者移植后1年生存率相似(92.1% vs 90.7%)。在倾向评分匹配的比较中,可比较的移植后生存率持续存在。样条模型显示,与15分钟的对照相比,较长的CPR时间与移植后1年生存率较低的几率无关。在亚组分析中,较长的CPR持续时间与供体心脏利用率的降低没有显著相关。结论:接受心肺复苏术的供体需要考虑DCD移植,因为在停止生命支持之前心脏骤停期间的损伤可能会加剧采血过程中的热缺血损伤。这项研究表明,使用DCD心脏进行心肺复苏术可以扩大供体池,而不会影响移植后早期生存。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.