Validity and reliability of a proposed anterior implant esthetic index (AIEI).

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.027
Goth Siu, James L Sheets, Cortino Sukotjo, Alvin G Wee, Judy Chia-Chun Yuan
{"title":"Validity and reliability of a proposed anterior implant esthetic index (AIEI).","authors":"Goth Siu, James L Sheets, Cortino Sukotjo, Alvin G Wee, Judy Chia-Chun Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Patient satisfaction and esthetic acceptance are important factors in predicting the success of implant therapy in the anterior maxilla. A standardized esthetic index to evaluate implant esthetic outcomes is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purposes of this study were to describe the newly developed images that correlate to the pink esthetic score and white esthetic score (PES/WES) for improved standardized documentation and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the proposed anterior implant esthetic index (AIEI) with patient satisfaction scores.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A photograph deemed ideal (perfect score of 2) using the PES/WES criteria was acquired and digitally altered to represent scores of 1 (minor discrepancy) and 0 (major discrepancy) according to the PES/WES guidelines. A pilot study enrolled prosthodontists and periodontists to review and verify the representations. A 29-question survey was developed and distributed to 33 participants on a tablet computer to evaluate the photographs. The participants were asked about their satisfaction level with the photographs on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100. Data were extracted, and ANOVA was used to compare mean satisfaction scores. Post hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze the differences within each variable (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standardized sets of 14 altered PES and 14 altered WES photographs were generated. The interrater reliability (n=5) of the pilot study showed moderate agreement with κ=0.453 (95% CI: 0.431-0.476) for all and individual scores. Based on the patient survey, 5 of the 14 factors of the PES/WES showed no significant difference and were eliminated when constructing the index. Using scores and percentages, the anterior implant esthetic index was developed for scores of 0, 1, and 2 for each of the remaining 9 criteria. The maximum score for the index was 20 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Photographic representation of each criterion within the PES/WES standardized the patient's ability to evaluate anterior implant esthetics. An anterior implant esthetic index was developed, and a moderate interrater reliability agreement and good validation with patient satisfaction scores were obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Patient satisfaction and esthetic acceptance are important factors in predicting the success of implant therapy in the anterior maxilla. A standardized esthetic index to evaluate implant esthetic outcomes is still lacking.

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to describe the newly developed images that correlate to the pink esthetic score and white esthetic score (PES/WES) for improved standardized documentation and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the proposed anterior implant esthetic index (AIEI) with patient satisfaction scores.

Material and methods: A photograph deemed ideal (perfect score of 2) using the PES/WES criteria was acquired and digitally altered to represent scores of 1 (minor discrepancy) and 0 (major discrepancy) according to the PES/WES guidelines. A pilot study enrolled prosthodontists and periodontists to review and verify the representations. A 29-question survey was developed and distributed to 33 participants on a tablet computer to evaluate the photographs. The participants were asked about their satisfaction level with the photographs on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100. Data were extracted, and ANOVA was used to compare mean satisfaction scores. Post hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze the differences within each variable (α=.05).

Results: Standardized sets of 14 altered PES and 14 altered WES photographs were generated. The interrater reliability (n=5) of the pilot study showed moderate agreement with κ=0.453 (95% CI: 0.431-0.476) for all and individual scores. Based on the patient survey, 5 of the 14 factors of the PES/WES showed no significant difference and were eliminated when constructing the index. Using scores and percentages, the anterior implant esthetic index was developed for scores of 0, 1, and 2 for each of the remaining 9 criteria. The maximum score for the index was 20 points.

Conclusions: Photographic representation of each criterion within the PES/WES standardized the patient's ability to evaluate anterior implant esthetics. An anterior implant esthetic index was developed, and a moderate interrater reliability agreement and good validation with patient satisfaction scores were obtained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor regarding "Computer guided root tip extraction and implant placement: A clinical report". Validity and reliability of a proposed anterior implant esthetic index (AIEI). Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: A systematic review. Letter to the Editor regarding, "An up to thirty-year retrospective study on the success and survival of single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns in a dental school setting". Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding, "Computer guided root tip extraction and implant placement: A clinical report".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1