Application of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in the Management of Patients With Intrathecal Morphine Pump Implantation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.019
Lixing Sun, Ming Fang, Tingyu Xu, Miaobo Liu, Shujing Fang, Weijiao Feng
{"title":"Application of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in the Management of Patients With Intrathecal Morphine Pump Implantation.","authors":"Lixing Sun, Ming Fang, Tingyu Xu, Miaobo Liu, Shujing Fang, Weijiao Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal morphine pump helps alleviate pain in the advanced stages of cancer, and thus, ensuring safe intrathecal morphine pump infusion is important. In this study, we investigated the effect of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis (HFMEA) in the management of patients with intrathecal morphine pump implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 112 cancer patients with severe pain who met the inclusion criteria for intrathecal morphine pump implantation treatment in the pain department of our hospital from November 2021 to October 2022. We analyzed the severity, likelihood, and crisis of potential failure modes, causes, and results of intrathecal morphine pumps during this period, compiled the records, and formulated the appropriate improvement measures based on the results of the analysis. From November 2022 to October 2023, the HFMEA model was applied to 125 patients in the department, and the effectiveness of the model was evaluated by assessing the patients' VAS (visual analog scale) score, SAS (self-rating anxiety scale) score, SDS score, PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) score and quality of life (QOL) (self-rating depression scale) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The occurrence of adverse events (6 cases vs. 2 cases, p < .05), and the total incidence of adverse events (8.9% vs. 1.6%, X<sup>2</sup>= 6.600, p = .010) was significantly different before and after HFMEA was applied. For patients who received intrathecal morphine pump implantation, the VAS scores and the related pain indices were significantly lower after HFMEA than before. Additionally, the score of SAS (48.91 ± 6.03 vs. 47.02 ± 6.77), PSQI (37.30 ± 5.78 vs. 39.63 ± 5.64), and QOL (9.93 ± 3.04 vs. 8.98 ± 2.31) of patients improved significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the application of the HFMEA model, a multidisciplinary team assessed the risks associated with the use of intrathecal morphine pumps and prioritized measures to reduce them. By implementing the improvement measures, potential errors decreased significantly during the intrathecal morphine pump process. It allowed nursing managers to change the safety incidents related to drug administration using an intrathecal morphine pump from negative treatment after the event to active prevention before the event, greatly improved the level of drug use safety management, reflected the continuous improvement of nursing quality, and ensured nursing safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.10.019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal morphine pump helps alleviate pain in the advanced stages of cancer, and thus, ensuring safe intrathecal morphine pump infusion is important. In this study, we investigated the effect of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis (HFMEA) in the management of patients with intrathecal morphine pump implantation.

Methods: We included 112 cancer patients with severe pain who met the inclusion criteria for intrathecal morphine pump implantation treatment in the pain department of our hospital from November 2021 to October 2022. We analyzed the severity, likelihood, and crisis of potential failure modes, causes, and results of intrathecal morphine pumps during this period, compiled the records, and formulated the appropriate improvement measures based on the results of the analysis. From November 2022 to October 2023, the HFMEA model was applied to 125 patients in the department, and the effectiveness of the model was evaluated by assessing the patients' VAS (visual analog scale) score, SAS (self-rating anxiety scale) score, SDS score, PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) score and quality of life (QOL) (self-rating depression scale) score.

Results: The occurrence of adverse events (6 cases vs. 2 cases, p < .05), and the total incidence of adverse events (8.9% vs. 1.6%, X2= 6.600, p = .010) was significantly different before and after HFMEA was applied. For patients who received intrathecal morphine pump implantation, the VAS scores and the related pain indices were significantly lower after HFMEA than before. Additionally, the score of SAS (48.91 ± 6.03 vs. 47.02 ± 6.77), PSQI (37.30 ± 5.78 vs. 39.63 ± 5.64), and QOL (9.93 ± 3.04 vs. 8.98 ± 2.31) of patients improved significantly.

Conclusions: With the application of the HFMEA model, a multidisciplinary team assessed the risks associated with the use of intrathecal morphine pumps and prioritized measures to reduce them. By implementing the improvement measures, potential errors decreased significantly during the intrathecal morphine pump process. It allowed nursing managers to change the safety incidents related to drug administration using an intrathecal morphine pump from negative treatment after the event to active prevention before the event, greatly improved the level of drug use safety management, reflected the continuous improvement of nursing quality, and ensured nursing safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗失败模式及效果分析在鞘内吗啡泵植入患者管理中的应用。
背景:鞘内吗啡泵有助于缓解晚期癌症患者的疼痛,因此确保鞘内吗啡泵的安全输注是非常重要的。在本研究中,我们探讨了医疗失败模式和效果分析(HFMEA)在鞘内吗啡泵植入患者管理中的作用。方法:选取我院疼痛科2021年11月至2022年10月收治的符合鞘内吗啡泵植入治疗纳入标准的恶性疼痛患者112例。对这段时间内鞘内吗啡泵潜在失效模式、原因、结果的严重程度、可能性、危机性进行分析,整理记录,并根据分析结果制定相应的改进措施。于2022年11月至2023年10月,将HFMEA模型应用于该科125例患者,通过评估患者VAS(视觉模拟量表)评分、SAS(焦虑自评量表)评分、SDS评分、PSQI(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)评分和生活质量(抑郁自评量表)评分,对模型的有效性进行评价。结果:应用HFMEA前后不良事件发生率(6例对2例,p < 0.05)和总不良事件发生率(8.9%对1.6%,X2= 6.600, p = 0.010)差异有统计学意义。鞘内吗啡泵植入术后患者的VAS评分及相关疼痛指标均明显低于术前。此外,患者的SAS评分(48.91±6.03比47.02±6.77)、PSQI评分(37.30±5.78比39.63±5.64)、生活质量(9.93±3.04比8.98±2.31)均显著改善。结论:通过HFMEA模型的应用,一个多学科团队评估了鞘内吗啡泵使用的相关风险,并确定了降低风险的优先措施。通过实施改进措施,鞘内吗啡泵入过程中潜在错误明显减少。使护理管理者将鞘内吗啡泵给药安全事故由事后的消极处理转变为事前的积极预防,大大提高了用药安全管理水平,体现了护理质量的不断提高,保证了护理安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Tele-Pain and Substance Use Disorder Care for Patients in a Rural Setting: Results of a Single-Arm Open-Label Pilot Trial. Effects of Repeated Feedback on Pain Documentation: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Postcompetency Index System for Assessing Pain Resource Nurses' Competence: A Delphi Study. Nursing Care of the Patient With Epidural Analgesia. Scoping Review: A Hybrid Delivery Model of Pain Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1