Risk Stratification of Potential Drug Interactions Involving Common Over-the-Counter Medications and Herbal Supplements by a Large Language Model.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102304
John Kim, John Wr Kincaid, Arya Rao, Winston Lie, Lanting Fuh, Adam B Landman, Marc D Succi
{"title":"Risk Stratification of Potential Drug Interactions Involving Common Over-the-Counter Medications and Herbal Supplements by a Large Language Model.","authors":"John Kim, John Wr Kincaid, Arya Rao, Winston Lie, Lanting Fuh, Adam B Landman, Marc D Succi","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As polypharmacy, the use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, and herbal supplements become increasingly prevalent, the potential for adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) poses significant challenges to patient safety and healthcare outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the capacity of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models to accurately assess DDIs involving prescription drugs (Rx) with OTC medications and herbal supplements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Leveraging a popular subscription-based tool (Lexicomp®), we compared the risk ratings assigned by these models to 43 Rx-OTC and 30 Rx-herbal supplement pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal that all models generally underperform, with accuracies below 50% and poor agreement with Lexicomp standards as measured by Cohen's kappa. Notably, GPT-4 and GPT-4o demonstrated a modest improvement in identifying higher-risk interactions compared to GPT-3.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight the challenges and limitations of using off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) for guidance in DDI assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":" ","pages":"102304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As polypharmacy, the use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, and herbal supplements become increasingly prevalent, the potential for adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) poses significant challenges to patient safety and healthcare outcomes.

Objectives: This study evaluates the capacity of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models to accurately assess DDIs involving prescription drugs (Rx) with OTC medications and herbal supplements.

Methods: Leveraging a popular subscription-based tool (Lexicomp®), we compared the risk ratings assigned by these models to 43 Rx-OTC and 30 Rx-herbal supplement pairs.

Results: Our findings reveal that all models generally underperform, with accuracies below 50% and poor agreement with Lexicomp standards as measured by Cohen's kappa. Notably, GPT-4 and GPT-4o demonstrated a modest improvement in identifying higher-risk interactions compared to GPT-3.5.

Conclusion: These results highlight the challenges and limitations of using off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) for guidance in DDI assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Telemedicine-led Heart Failure Medication Regimen Optimization Clinic in Medically Underserved Heart Failure Populations. Exploring the pharmacist role in insomnia management and care provision: A scoping review. Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Older Adults: Incidence and Risk Factors Related to Patient Characteristics and Initial Opioid Dispensed. Pharmacists Enhance National Security through Medical Countermeasure Program Leadership. Barriers to and Facilitators of Buprenorphine Dispensing for Opioid Use Disorder: Evidence from Focus Groups in Appalachian Kentucky.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1