Modeling and Comparative Analysis of CO2 Absorption Columns in Electrochemical and Thermochemical Carbon Capture Systems

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01523
Katelyn M. Ripley, Fikile R. Brushett
{"title":"Modeling and Comparative Analysis of CO2 Absorption Columns in Electrochemical and Thermochemical Carbon Capture Systems","authors":"Katelyn M. Ripley, Fikile R. Brushett","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deployment of post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) capture technologies is needed to reduce emissions from power and industrial sources. Comparisons between existing thermochemical CO<sub>2</sub> capture methods and emerging electrochemical concepts can help contextualize the promise of these new approaches. Here, we investigate the required absorber sizes for three capture systems: amine scrubbing using monoethanolamine (MEA), direct electrochemical (redox-active sorbent), and indirect electrochemical (pH swing). For the electrochemical systems, we study how column size varies as a function of molecular properties and operating conditions, finding that parameters most closely related to CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rates (i.e., rate constants and p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub>) have the greatest impact. Through a Monte Carlo analysis, we find that the direct process can be designed to have column sizes similar to the thermochemical process; however, the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rate in the indirect process is too slow to enable smaller columns. Broadly, this work connects system input parameters to absorber performance for electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> capture and provides a foundation for techno-economic and engineering analyses.","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deployment of post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologies is needed to reduce emissions from power and industrial sources. Comparisons between existing thermochemical CO2 capture methods and emerging electrochemical concepts can help contextualize the promise of these new approaches. Here, we investigate the required absorber sizes for three capture systems: amine scrubbing using monoethanolamine (MEA), direct electrochemical (redox-active sorbent), and indirect electrochemical (pH swing). For the electrochemical systems, we study how column size varies as a function of molecular properties and operating conditions, finding that parameters most closely related to CO2 uptake rates (i.e., rate constants and pKa) have the greatest impact. Through a Monte Carlo analysis, we find that the direct process can be designed to have column sizes similar to the thermochemical process; however, the CO2 uptake rate in the indirect process is too slow to enable smaller columns. Broadly, this work connects system input parameters to absorber performance for electrochemical CO2 capture and provides a foundation for techno-economic and engineering analyses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电化学和热化学碳捕获系统中CO2吸收柱的建模和比较分析
为了减少电力和工业排放,需要部署燃烧后二氧化碳(CO2)捕获技术。将现有的热化学CO2捕获方法与新兴的电化学概念进行比较,有助于了解这些新方法的前景。在这里,我们研究了三种捕获系统所需的吸收剂尺寸:使用单乙醇胺(MEA)的胺洗涤,直接电化学(氧化还原活性吸附剂)和间接电化学(pH值波动)。对于电化学系统,我们研究了柱尺寸如何随分子性质和操作条件的变化而变化,发现与CO2吸收率最密切相关的参数(即速率常数和pKa)影响最大。通过蒙特卡罗分析,我们发现直接过程可以设计成与热化学过程相似的塔尺寸;然而,间接过程中的CO2吸收率太慢,无法实现较小的色谱柱。总的来说,这项工作将系统输入参数与电化学CO2捕获的吸收器性能联系起来,为技术经济和工程分析提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol over Cu-ZnO Catalyst Modified with Gallium Designing an Organic–Inorganic Composite Binder for High-Performance Si-Based Anodes Development of Two Geometrically Optimized Hydrocyclones to Process Viscous and Pseudoplastic Suspensions CAU-10-H: Synthesis Scale-Up at the Pilot Scale, Techno-Economic Analysis, and Application in a Full-Scale Cooling System Integrated CFD–PBE Modeling and Experimental Analysis of Glycine Crystallization in Slug Flow Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1