Few-shot multi-hop reasoning via reinforcement learning and path search strategy over temporal knowledge graphs

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.104001
Luyi Bai, Han Zhang, Xuanxuan An, Lin Zhu
{"title":"Few-shot multi-hop reasoning via reinforcement learning and path search strategy over temporal knowledge graphs","authors":"Luyi Bai,&nbsp;Han Zhang,&nbsp;Xuanxuan An,&nbsp;Lin Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.104001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multi-hop reasoning on knowledge graphs is an important way to complete the knowledge graph. However, existing multi-hop reasoning methods often perform poorly in few-shot scenarios and primarily focus on static knowledge graphs, neglecting to model the dynamic changes of events over time in Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs). Therefore, in this paper, we consider the few-shot multi-hop reasoning task on TKGs and propose a few-shot multi-hop reasoning model for TKGs (TFSM), which uses a reinforcement learning framework to improve model interpretability and introduces the one-hop neighbors of the task entity to consider the impact of previous events on the representation of current task entity. In order to reduce the cost of searching complex nodes, our model adopts a strategy based on path search and prunes the search space by considering the correlation between existing paths and the current state. Compared to the baseline method, our model achieved 5-shot Few-shot Temporal Knowledge Graph (FTKG) performance improvements of 1.0% ∼ 18.9% on ICEWS18-few, 0.6% ∼ 22.9% on ICEWS14-few, and 0.7% ∼ 10.5% on GDELT-few. Extensive experiments show that TFSM outperforms existing models on most metrics on the commonly used benchmark datasets ICEWS18-few, ICEWS14-few, and GDELT-few. Furthermore, ablation experiments demonstrated the effectiveness of each part of our model. In addition, we demonstrate the interpretability of the model by performing path analysis with a path search-based strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 104001"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324003601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-hop reasoning on knowledge graphs is an important way to complete the knowledge graph. However, existing multi-hop reasoning methods often perform poorly in few-shot scenarios and primarily focus on static knowledge graphs, neglecting to model the dynamic changes of events over time in Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs). Therefore, in this paper, we consider the few-shot multi-hop reasoning task on TKGs and propose a few-shot multi-hop reasoning model for TKGs (TFSM), which uses a reinforcement learning framework to improve model interpretability and introduces the one-hop neighbors of the task entity to consider the impact of previous events on the representation of current task entity. In order to reduce the cost of searching complex nodes, our model adopts a strategy based on path search and prunes the search space by considering the correlation between existing paths and the current state. Compared to the baseline method, our model achieved 5-shot Few-shot Temporal Knowledge Graph (FTKG) performance improvements of 1.0% ∼ 18.9% on ICEWS18-few, 0.6% ∼ 22.9% on ICEWS14-few, and 0.7% ∼ 10.5% on GDELT-few. Extensive experiments show that TFSM outperforms existing models on most metrics on the commonly used benchmark datasets ICEWS18-few, ICEWS14-few, and GDELT-few. Furthermore, ablation experiments demonstrated the effectiveness of each part of our model. In addition, we demonstrate the interpretability of the model by performing path analysis with a path search-based strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Few-shot multi-hop reasoning via reinforcement learning and path search strategy over temporal knowledge graphs Basis is also explanation: Interpretable Legal Judgment Reasoning prompted by multi-source knowledge Extracting key insights from earnings call transcript via information-theoretic contrastive learning Advancing rule learning in knowledge graphs with structure-aware graph transformer DCIB: Dual contrastive information bottleneck for knowledge-aware recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1