Nutritional risk screening by the emergency medical services: Agreement with in-hospital assessment

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101553
Eeva Saario , Marja Mäkinen , Esa Jämsen , Maaret Castrén
{"title":"Nutritional risk screening by the emergency medical services: Agreement with in-hospital assessment","authors":"Eeva Saario ,&nbsp;Marja Mäkinen ,&nbsp;Esa Jämsen ,&nbsp;Maaret Castrén","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Early recognition of nutritional risk is important to prevent the adverse consequences of malnutrition. However, nutritional risk screening is often disregarded in hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the agreement of nutritional risk screening results between screening performed by emergency medical services (EMS) and at the hospital ward.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The EMS used the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) to screen the nutritional risk of community-dwelling patients aged ≥ 70 years transported to the emergency department of a large Finnish hospital. The NRS-2002 results from the EMS were compared to results obtained during hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The EMS screened 472 patients and recognized nutritional risk in 81 (17 %). NRS-2002 was repeated at hospital ward in 97 of the screened. In about two-thirds of the cases (69 %), the EMS and ward personnel agreed on whether the patient had nutritional risk or not, and one-third of patients (31/97, 32 %) had the exact same score. The EMS tended to give lower scores (mean difference 0.70 ± 1.29, p &lt; 0.001). Twenty-four patients considered not to be at nutritional risk according to the EMS were recognized as risk patients at the ward.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nutritional risk screening by the EMS could help in identifying persons requiring more detailed assessment of nutritional status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24001484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Early recognition of nutritional risk is important to prevent the adverse consequences of malnutrition. However, nutritional risk screening is often disregarded in hospitals.

Purpose

To evaluate the agreement of nutritional risk screening results between screening performed by emergency medical services (EMS) and at the hospital ward.

Methods

The EMS used the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) to screen the nutritional risk of community-dwelling patients aged ≥ 70 years transported to the emergency department of a large Finnish hospital. The NRS-2002 results from the EMS were compared to results obtained during hospitalization.

Results

The EMS screened 472 patients and recognized nutritional risk in 81 (17 %). NRS-2002 was repeated at hospital ward in 97 of the screened. In about two-thirds of the cases (69 %), the EMS and ward personnel agreed on whether the patient had nutritional risk or not, and one-third of patients (31/97, 32 %) had the exact same score. The EMS tended to give lower scores (mean difference 0.70 ± 1.29, p < 0.001). Twenty-four patients considered not to be at nutritional risk according to the EMS were recognized as risk patients at the ward.

Conclusion

Nutritional risk screening by the EMS could help in identifying persons requiring more detailed assessment of nutritional status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急医疗服务的营养风险筛查:与院内评估一致
早期识别营养风险对于预防营养不良的不良后果非常重要。然而,医院往往忽视营养风险筛查。目的评价急诊医疗服务(EMS)和医院病房营养风险筛查结果的一致性。方法EMS采用营养风险筛查2002 (NRS-2002)对芬兰某大型医院急诊科收治的≥70岁社区居民的营养风险进行筛查。EMS的NRS-2002结果与住院期间的结果进行了比较。结果EMS筛查了472例患者,发现81例(17%)存在营养风险。其中97例在医院病房重复进行了NRS-2002调查。在大约三分之二(69%)的病例中,EMS和病房人员对患者是否有营养风险的看法是一致的,三分之一的患者(31/ 97,32 %)的得分完全相同。EMS评分较低(平均差0.70±1.29,p <;0.001)。24例根据EMS被认为没有营养风险的患者在病房被认定为风险患者。结论EMS的营养风险筛查有助于识别需要更详细营养状况评估的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Disaster surge capacity through reverse triage in Addis Ababa Ethiopia: A retrospective cross-sectional study Psychometric validation and cultural adaptation of the Italian version of the ambulance nurse competence scale Editorial Board Major disaster, profound impact: A qualitative examination of emergency department nurses’ experiences during the 2023 Turkey Maraş earthquake Interventions to retain emergency department nurses: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1