Isolated posterior stabilization of the pelvic ring in type III/IV fragility fractures of the pelvis are beneficial compared to 360° antero-posterior surgical approaches. A dual-center cohort analysis

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112043
Christopher Lampert , Florian Pachmann , Johannes Rieger , Yunjie Zhang , Johannes Gleich , Markus Stumpf , Johannes Beckmann , Wolfgang Böcker , Carl Neuerburg , Christoph Linhart
{"title":"Isolated posterior stabilization of the pelvic ring in type III/IV fragility fractures of the pelvis are beneficial compared to 360° antero-posterior surgical approaches. A dual-center cohort analysis","authors":"Christopher Lampert ,&nbsp;Florian Pachmann ,&nbsp;Johannes Rieger ,&nbsp;Yunjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Johannes Gleich ,&nbsp;Markus Stumpf ,&nbsp;Johannes Beckmann ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Böcker ,&nbsp;Carl Neuerburg ,&nbsp;Christoph Linhart","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in elderly patients are an increasing concern due to their association with osteoporosis and the aging population. These fractures significantly affect patients’ mobility and quality of life. This study evaluates different surgical techniques in patients suffering from FFP to provide standardized recommendations for treatment strategies. In addition, we compared therapeutic concepts and their outcome between two major trauma centers in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 882 patients aged over 65 years who suffered from FFP between 2003 and 2020 at a level I and level III trauma center in a german metropolis. Fractures were classified according to Rommens and Hofmann. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture type, treatment strategy, and length of hospital stay.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FFP I fractures were predominantly treated conservatively at both centers. Significant variability was noted in the treatment of type II and III fractures, with level III trauma center having a higher surgical intervention rate for FFP II in 27.6 % compared to the level I trauma center in 9.9 % of the cases. The most common procedure at both hospitals was the stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Patients who underwent less invasive posterior-only stabilization had shorter length of hospital stay than those who received combined anterior and posterior stabilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study reveals substantial differences in the treatment approaches for FFP between two major trauma centers. Less invasive surgical methods, particularly posterior-only stabilization, are associated with shorter hospital stays and potentially better outcomes for elderly patients with unstable FFP.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of minimally invasive surgical techniques in managing FFP in elderly patients, highlighting their potential to reduce the length of hospital stay and improve recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in elderly patients are an increasing concern due to their association with osteoporosis and the aging population. These fractures significantly affect patients’ mobility and quality of life. This study evaluates different surgical techniques in patients suffering from FFP to provide standardized recommendations for treatment strategies. In addition, we compared therapeutic concepts and their outcome between two major trauma centers in Germany.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 882 patients aged over 65 years who suffered from FFP between 2003 and 2020 at a level I and level III trauma center in a german metropolis. Fractures were classified according to Rommens and Hofmann. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture type, treatment strategy, and length of hospital stay.

Results

FFP I fractures were predominantly treated conservatively at both centers. Significant variability was noted in the treatment of type II and III fractures, with level III trauma center having a higher surgical intervention rate for FFP II in 27.6 % compared to the level I trauma center in 9.9 % of the cases. The most common procedure at both hospitals was the stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Patients who underwent less invasive posterior-only stabilization had shorter length of hospital stay than those who received combined anterior and posterior stabilization.

Conclusions

The study reveals substantial differences in the treatment approaches for FFP between two major trauma centers. Less invasive surgical methods, particularly posterior-only stabilization, are associated with shorter hospital stays and potentially better outcomes for elderly patients with unstable FFP.

Clinical Relevance

This study underscores the importance of minimally invasive surgical techniques in managing FFP in elderly patients, highlighting their potential to reduce the length of hospital stay and improve recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与360°前后路手术入路相比,III/IV型骨盆脆性骨折的骨盆环孤立后路稳定是有益的。双中心队列分析
背景:老年患者骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)由于与骨质疏松症和人口老龄化相关而日益受到关注。这些骨折显著影响患者的活动能力和生活质量。本研究评估FFP患者的不同手术技术,为治疗策略提供标准化建议。此外,我们比较了德国两家主要创伤中心的治疗理念及其结果。方法回顾性分析2003年至2020年在德国某大都市的一、三级创伤中心就诊的882例65岁以上FFP患者。骨折按照Rommens和Hofmann分类。数据收集包括患者人口统计、骨折类型、治疗策略和住院时间。结果两中心均以保守治疗为主。II型和III型骨折的治疗存在显著差异,III级创伤中心对II型FFP的手术干预率为27.6%,而I级创伤中心的手术干预率为9.9%。这两家医院最常见的手术是稳定骨盆后环。接受微创后路稳定治疗的患者比接受前后路联合稳定治疗的患者住院时间短。结论:本研究揭示了两大创伤中心在FFP治疗方法上的实质性差异。对于不稳定FFP的老年患者,侵入性较小的手术方法,特别是单纯的后路稳定,与更短的住院时间和潜在的更好的结果相关。本研究强调了微创手术技术在治疗老年FFP患者中的重要性,强调了其减少住院时间和改善康复的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Gait assessment in patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures after treatment with the Ilizarov method An endpoint adjudication committee for the assessment of computed tomography scans in fracture healing Isolated posterior stabilization of the pelvic ring in type III/IV fragility fractures of the pelvis are beneficial compared to 360° antero-posterior surgical approaches. A dual-center cohort analysis Does injury type influence patient preference, response rates, and data completeness for online or telephone follow-up following injury?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1