Push-pull mechanisms in China's intercity population migration: Nonlinearity and asymmetry

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105624
Feng Shi , Wei Geng , Runhua Huang , Yanwu Mao , Jianmin Jia
{"title":"Push-pull mechanisms in China's intercity population migration: Nonlinearity and asymmetry","authors":"Feng Shi ,&nbsp;Wei Geng ,&nbsp;Runhua Huang ,&nbsp;Yanwu Mao ,&nbsp;Jianmin Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has often assumed a predefined, typically linear, relationship between migration and city characteristics. However, few studies have explored how these factors asymmetrically influence migration as push factors at the origin and pull factors at the destination. This study utilizes mobility data from the return-to-home phase of <em>Chunyun</em> in 2020 and employs the Random Forest (RF) model to construct a nonlinear explanatory framework for the push-pull effects and their asymmetry in intercity population migration. The findings reveal three key insights: Firstly, there is a notable asymmetry between push and pull effects in the predictive importance of feature variables. Pull effects at the destination are more prominent for economic and employment factors, whereas push effects at the origin are more influential for factors related to the living environment and gender differences. Secondly, we identify the phase transition points and threshold intervals of coupling effects based on the variations in the shapes, gradients, and thresholds of the nonlinear push-pull effects. In addition, we examine the disparities in the context of push and pull dynamics for the interaction effects of multiple variables. Thirdly, heterogeneity in demographic subsamples and different urban scenarios is observed, with within-group differences exhibiting various patterns of change. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers to develop targeted population policies that account for the complex interplay of push and pull factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 105624"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124008382","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has often assumed a predefined, typically linear, relationship between migration and city characteristics. However, few studies have explored how these factors asymmetrically influence migration as push factors at the origin and pull factors at the destination. This study utilizes mobility data from the return-to-home phase of Chunyun in 2020 and employs the Random Forest (RF) model to construct a nonlinear explanatory framework for the push-pull effects and their asymmetry in intercity population migration. The findings reveal three key insights: Firstly, there is a notable asymmetry between push and pull effects in the predictive importance of feature variables. Pull effects at the destination are more prominent for economic and employment factors, whereas push effects at the origin are more influential for factors related to the living environment and gender differences. Secondly, we identify the phase transition points and threshold intervals of coupling effects based on the variations in the shapes, gradients, and thresholds of the nonlinear push-pull effects. In addition, we examine the disparities in the context of push and pull dynamics for the interaction effects of multiple variables. Thirdly, heterogeneity in demographic subsamples and different urban scenarios is observed, with within-group differences exhibiting various patterns of change. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers to develop targeted population policies that account for the complex interplay of push and pull factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国城际人口迁移的推拉机制:非线性与不对称
以前的研究通常假设移民和城市特征之间存在预定义的、典型的线性关系。然而,很少有研究探讨这些因素如何在原点作为推动因素和在目的地作为拉动因素不对称地影响迁移。本文利用2020年春运返乡期人口流动数据,采用随机森林(RF)模型构建了城际人口迁移的推拉效应及其不对称性的非线性解释框架。研究结果揭示了三个关键见解:首先,在特征变量的预测重要性方面,推拉效应之间存在显著的不对称性。目的地的拉动效应对经济和就业因素影响更大,而出发地的推动效应对生活环境和性别差异等因素影响更大。其次,根据非线性推拉效应的形状、梯度和阈值的变化,确定耦合效应的相变点和阈值区间;此外,我们研究了在推拉动力学背景下的差异,以获得多变量的相互作用效应。第三,人口亚样本和不同城市情景的异质性,组内差异表现出不同的变化模式。这些发现为政策制定者制定有针对性的人口政策提供了有价值的见解,这些政策考虑了推拉因素的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Dissecting multidimensional morphology of urban sprawl: Framework for policy intervention The role of polycentric urban structures in shaping low-carbon lifestyles Socioeconomic and ethnic segregation in Finland: A multi-scale analysis of diverse urban sizes Unveiling the dynamics and determinants of world city network: Insights from global airline data Push-pull mechanisms in China's intercity population migration: Nonlinearity and asymmetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1