Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386
Patricia Puente , Balaji Rajagopalan , Laura E. Condon
{"title":"Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin","authors":"Patricia Puente ,&nbsp;Balaji Rajagopalan ,&nbsp;Laura E. Condon","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a <span><math><mi>D</mi></math></span>-dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"648 ","pages":"Article 132386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424017827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a D-dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Climate change reshapes bioclimatic environments in China’s dry–wet transition zones” [J. Hydrol. 634 (2024) 131122] Dependence of riverine total phosphorus retention and fluxes on hydrology and river size at river network scale Investigating the effects of spatial heterogeneity of multi-source profile soil moisture on spatial–temporal processes of high-resolution floods Estimating family of soil–water characteristic curves for sandy soils from unimodal grain size distribution and void ratio A novel implementation of pre-processing approaches and hybrid kernel-based model for short- and long-term groundwater drought forecasting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1