Optimization and comparative analysis of various organic Rankine cycle-based integrated systems for cooling and power cogeneration utilizing waste heat

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119328
Xiaojing Sun, Linlin Liu, Tong Zhang, Yao Zhao, Yanjun Dai
{"title":"Optimization and comparative analysis of various organic Rankine cycle-based integrated systems for cooling and power cogeneration utilizing waste heat","authors":"Xiaojing Sun, Linlin Liu, Tong Zhang, Yao Zhao, Yanjun Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waste heat recovery is crucial for reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions. The integration of organic Rankine cycle with absorption refrigeration, vapor compression refrigeration, and compression-absorption cascade refrigeration enables efficient cooling and power cogeneration from waste heat. However, existing studies lack a unified optimization method, a systematic comparison framework, and thorough application scenarios analysis. Herein, a comprehensive integrated system incorporating operational modes of organic Rankine cycle with these refrigeration technologies is developed. An economic optimization model is formulated to determine the optimal configuration and operating parameters for the integrated system under specified modes. A comparison framework is established to identify the system with the best economic performance. Using the proposed method, optimization and comparative analyses are conducted for six scenarios with distinct cooling energy demands. Results indicate that organic Rankine cycle integrated with absorption refrigeration and compression-absorption cascade refrigeration achieves superior economic performance under 500 kW at 25 °C and −25 °C, respectively. In contrast, integration with vapor compression refrigeration remains more economically advantageous under 5,000 kW or at 5 °C. Additionally, the effects of cooling energy and waste heat source conditions on economic performance are analyzed, and suitable application scenarios for each system are summarized. This research facilitates automatic design of organic Rankine cycle-based integrated systems with enhanced economic performance, providing valuable guidance for industrial waste heat utilization.","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"728 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119328","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waste heat recovery is crucial for reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions. The integration of organic Rankine cycle with absorption refrigeration, vapor compression refrigeration, and compression-absorption cascade refrigeration enables efficient cooling and power cogeneration from waste heat. However, existing studies lack a unified optimization method, a systematic comparison framework, and thorough application scenarios analysis. Herein, a comprehensive integrated system incorporating operational modes of organic Rankine cycle with these refrigeration technologies is developed. An economic optimization model is formulated to determine the optimal configuration and operating parameters for the integrated system under specified modes. A comparison framework is established to identify the system with the best economic performance. Using the proposed method, optimization and comparative analyses are conducted for six scenarios with distinct cooling energy demands. Results indicate that organic Rankine cycle integrated with absorption refrigeration and compression-absorption cascade refrigeration achieves superior economic performance under 500 kW at 25 °C and −25 °C, respectively. In contrast, integration with vapor compression refrigeration remains more economically advantageous under 5,000 kW or at 5 °C. Additionally, the effects of cooling energy and waste heat source conditions on economic performance are analyzed, and suitable application scenarios for each system are summarized. This research facilitates automatic design of organic Rankine cycle-based integrated systems with enhanced economic performance, providing valuable guidance for industrial waste heat utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
期刊最新文献
Optimization and comparative analysis of various organic Rankine cycle-based integrated systems for cooling and power cogeneration utilizing waste heat Editorial Board Editorial Board Performance analysis of a micro pneumatic turbine using actual driving conditions simulation Design and analysis of a CO2-to-olefins process, using renewable energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1