Heavy-duty trucks are a significant contributor to transport emissions. The transition from diesel to zero- or low-carbon renewable energy is a promising solution to decarbonising trucks. It remains unclear which low-carbon emission powertrain types are techno-economically competitive with diesel powertrains. This work conducts a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental analysis of four zero- or low-carbon emission powertrains: (1) battery electric vehicle, (2) fuel cell electric vehicle with onboard gaseous hydrogen storage, (3) fuel cell electric vehicle with onboard liquid hydrogen storage, and (4) gaseous hydrogen fuelled internal combustion engine vehicle. The total cost of ownership, well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions and the total cost of carbon abatement are evaluated for each truck type. The hourly electricity/hydrogen demand for trucks is met by modelling three different energy supply scenarios: (a) grid electricity, (b) wind, and (c) hybrid, which is a combination of wind and grid electricity compliant with the Renewable Energy Directive II. The results show that the most cost-effective zero- or low-emission trucking choice strongly depends on the energy supply scenario, large-scale stationary energy storage costs and the required driving distance of the trucks before refuelling/recharging. Battery electric vehicles are the most cost-effective trucking choice for required driving distances in the hybrid scenario. The cost of operating battery electric vehicles increases sharply with driving distances , and a fuel cell electric vehicle with onboard gaseous hydrogen storage provides the lowest ownership and carbon abatement costs in the hybrid scenario. The sensitivity analysis showed that higher truck fuel economy and deploying en-route refuelling stations improved the cost competitiveness of heavy-duty trucks. The findings from this study show that there is no one-size-fits-all solution, and both battery and hydrogen trucks have a role in decarbonising trucks.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
