Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.004
Mouyid Islam , Niloufar Shirani
{"title":"Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans","authors":"Mouyid Islam ,&nbsp;Niloufar Shirani","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> Distracted driving, particularly due to cellphone usage, poses a serious threat to road safety by diverting drivers’ attention from the road to activities like calling, talking, and texting. This not only jeopardizes the safety of the drivers themselves but also puts other road users at risk. To address this issue, many states have enacted laws prohibiting cellphone use while driving. This study investigates the impact of such laws on the severity of driver injuries, focusing on a comparison between Connecticut and Florida. <em>Method:</em> The study examines four years of crash data, during which Connecticut banned handheld phone use while driving, while Florida allowed hands-free use and treated handheld phone use as a secondary offense. Using random parameter logit models with heterogeneity in means and variances, the analysis identified differences in risk factors contributing to driver injury severity in both states with and without a cellphone ban. <em>Results:</em> Despite variations in data collection methods and variables across states, the study aligns and compares commonly defined and measured variables from crash incidents. The analysis identified 26 statistically significant variables in both models, with only four variables consistently affecting all levels of driver injury severity. These common risk factors include the involvement of newer vehicles (less than five years old from the crash involvement), incidents involving shoulders, young drivers (under 30 years old), and seat belt usage. <em>Conclusions/Practical Applications:</em> The findings emphasize the importance of modern safety features in newer vehicles, improved roadside design, driver training, and law enforcement measures targeting younger drivers to promote seat belt usage and mitigate distracted driving risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 192-206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Distracted driving, particularly due to cellphone usage, poses a serious threat to road safety by diverting drivers’ attention from the road to activities like calling, talking, and texting. This not only jeopardizes the safety of the drivers themselves but also puts other road users at risk. To address this issue, many states have enacted laws prohibiting cellphone use while driving. This study investigates the impact of such laws on the severity of driver injuries, focusing on a comparison between Connecticut and Florida. Method: The study examines four years of crash data, during which Connecticut banned handheld phone use while driving, while Florida allowed hands-free use and treated handheld phone use as a secondary offense. Using random parameter logit models with heterogeneity in means and variances, the analysis identified differences in risk factors contributing to driver injury severity in both states with and without a cellphone ban. Results: Despite variations in data collection methods and variables across states, the study aligns and compares commonly defined and measured variables from crash incidents. The analysis identified 26 statistically significant variables in both models, with only four variables consistently affecting all levels of driver injury severity. These common risk factors include the involvement of newer vehicles (less than five years old from the crash involvement), incidents involving shoulders, young drivers (under 30 years old), and seat belt usage. Conclusions/Practical Applications: The findings emphasize the importance of modern safety features in newer vehicles, improved roadside design, driver training, and law enforcement measures targeting younger drivers to promote seat belt usage and mitigate distracted driving risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans An evaluation of driver comprehension of the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon A systematic review of incentive schemes and their implications for truck driver safety performance Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1