Comparative analysis of counter-current and co-current downer reactors using particle image velocimetry and computational particle-fluid dynamics

IF 7.1 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Chemical Engineering Journal Advances Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ceja.2024.100687
Talal A. Aldugman , Mengmeng Cui , Abdulrahman Alzailaie , Abdullah Alhareth , Kenneth Langley , Lujain Alfilfil , Khalid Almajnouni , Jorge Gascon , Sigurdur Thoroddsen , Pedro Castaño
{"title":"Comparative analysis of counter-current and co-current downer reactors using particle image velocimetry and computational particle-fluid dynamics","authors":"Talal A. Aldugman ,&nbsp;Mengmeng Cui ,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Alzailaie ,&nbsp;Abdullah Alhareth ,&nbsp;Kenneth Langley ,&nbsp;Lujain Alfilfil ,&nbsp;Khalid Almajnouni ,&nbsp;Jorge Gascon ,&nbsp;Sigurdur Thoroddsen ,&nbsp;Pedro Castaño","doi":"10.1016/j.ceja.2024.100687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigated the hydrodynamics in co- and counter-current downer operations using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational particle fluid dynamics simulations (CPFD). Pilot-scale experiments were conducted for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and sand, which verified the system stability and provided the validation basis for the simulation strategy. We compared the reactor characteristics of counter-current and co-current downers under different operating modes and conditions using PIV experiments and CPFD simulations. PIV experiments showed that the counter-current downer exhibits a more uniform particle velocity profile, with a gradient of only 8 % of the maximum velocity, compared to the co-current operation, which shows a significantly steeper gradient of 39.5 % from the maximum. Simulations confirmed that the counter-current downer reactor has 69 % higher solid holdup and 98 % longer residence time than the co-current operation. Thus, the counter-current downer reactor demonstrated intermediate behavior between the classical co-current downer and riser reactors, offering flexibility for industrial applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9749,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Journal Advances","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100687"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Journal Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666821124001042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the hydrodynamics in co- and counter-current downer operations using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational particle fluid dynamics simulations (CPFD). Pilot-scale experiments were conducted for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and sand, which verified the system stability and provided the validation basis for the simulation strategy. We compared the reactor characteristics of counter-current and co-current downers under different operating modes and conditions using PIV experiments and CPFD simulations. PIV experiments showed that the counter-current downer exhibits a more uniform particle velocity profile, with a gradient of only 8 % of the maximum velocity, compared to the co-current operation, which shows a significantly steeper gradient of 39.5 % from the maximum. Simulations confirmed that the counter-current downer reactor has 69 % higher solid holdup and 98 % longer residence time than the co-current operation. Thus, the counter-current downer reactor demonstrated intermediate behavior between the classical co-current downer and riser reactors, offering flexibility for industrial applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用粒子图像测速法和计算粒子流体动力学对逆流和共流下行反应器进行对比分析
我们使用颗粒图像测速(PIV)和计算颗粒流体动力学模拟(CPFD)研究了共流和逆流降井作业中的流体动力学。以流体催化裂化(FCC)催化剂和砂为原料进行了中试,验证了系统的稳定性,为模拟策略的验证提供了依据。通过PIV实验和CPFD模拟,比较了不同工作模式和条件下逆流和共流降温器的电抗器特性。PIV实验表明,与共流操作相比,逆流降压器的颗粒速度分布更均匀,梯度仅为最大速度的8%,而共流降压器的颗粒速度梯度比最大速度陡39.5%。仿真结果表明,与共流运行相比,逆流下行反应器的固含率提高了69%,停留时间延长了98%。因此,逆流下行电抗器的性能介于经典的共流下行电抗器和提升电抗器之间,为工业应用提供了灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
Chemical Engineering Journal Advances Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
26 days
期刊最新文献
Interfacial rearrangement and nanomechanics of confined droplets stabilized by Janus and polymer-grafted nanoparticles Occurrence and human health risks of microplastics in the Bay of Bengal using Perna viridis as sentinel species Intermediate cellular regeneration counteracts the stop in methanol production from methane by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b Strategies of designing advanced dual-functional metal-organic frameworks for sustainable wastewater treatment applications Battery waste management: Tackling environmental, health, and resource challenges from growing waste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1