Flood risk assessment of coastal cities based on GCW_ISODATA and explainable artificial intelligence methods

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105025
Yawen Zang , Huimin Wang , Zhenzhen Liu , Jing Huang
{"title":"Flood risk assessment of coastal cities based on GCW_ISODATA and explainable artificial intelligence methods","authors":"Yawen Zang ,&nbsp;Huimin Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenzhen Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scientific and accurate assessment of risk influencing factors are crucial for flood risk management. This paper aims to propose a new comprehensive framework for flood risk assessment in coastal cities. Firstly, considering the flood characteristics of coastal cities and the impact of floods on urban spatial structure, a flood risk assessment indicator system for coastal cities was established. Secondly, combining game combination weighting and Iterative self-organizing data analysis technique algorithm (GCW_ISODATA) for flood risk assessment. Finally, based on the explainable machine learning techniques, the sensitivity of indicators to flood risk was analyzed. The results indicated that coastal floods are more destructive than rainfall and river floods. Moreover, the indicator weighting and threshold division have a direct impact on the rationality of flood risk, GCW_ISODATA method performs well in Accuracy, F1 score, and AUC, especially with the highest AUC among all methods. Entropy weight method and GCW are significantly superior to Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and ISODATA method usually performs better than the K-Means and Natural Break method. Furthermore, the sensitivity of indicators to flood risk reveals that differences in economic, social, and environmental characteristics across regions affect the actual impact of these indicators, leading to the sensitivity of the same indicator to flood risk varies significantly across different regions. It is expected that the framework proposed in this study can be used to explore flood risk impact on other coastal cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 105025"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924007878","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific and accurate assessment of risk influencing factors are crucial for flood risk management. This paper aims to propose a new comprehensive framework for flood risk assessment in coastal cities. Firstly, considering the flood characteristics of coastal cities and the impact of floods on urban spatial structure, a flood risk assessment indicator system for coastal cities was established. Secondly, combining game combination weighting and Iterative self-organizing data analysis technique algorithm (GCW_ISODATA) for flood risk assessment. Finally, based on the explainable machine learning techniques, the sensitivity of indicators to flood risk was analyzed. The results indicated that coastal floods are more destructive than rainfall and river floods. Moreover, the indicator weighting and threshold division have a direct impact on the rationality of flood risk, GCW_ISODATA method performs well in Accuracy, F1 score, and AUC, especially with the highest AUC among all methods. Entropy weight method and GCW are significantly superior to Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and ISODATA method usually performs better than the K-Means and Natural Break method. Furthermore, the sensitivity of indicators to flood risk reveals that differences in economic, social, and environmental characteristics across regions affect the actual impact of these indicators, leading to the sensitivity of the same indicator to flood risk varies significantly across different regions. It is expected that the framework proposed in this study can be used to explore flood risk impact on other coastal cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于GCW_ISODATA和可解释性人工智能方法的沿海城市洪水风险评估
科学准确地评估洪水风险影响因素是洪水风险管理的关键。本文旨在提出一种新的沿海城市洪水风险综合评估框架。首先,考虑沿海城市洪水特征和洪水对城市空间结构的影响,建立沿海城市洪水风险评价指标体系。其次,结合博弈组合加权和迭代自组织数据分析技术算法(GCW_ISODATA)进行洪水风险评估。最后,基于可解释机器学习技术,分析了指标对洪水风险的敏感性。结果表明,沿海洪水的破坏性大于降雨和河流洪水。此外,指标权重和阈值划分直接影响洪水风险的合理性,GCW_ISODATA方法在准确率、F1得分和AUC方面表现良好,其中AUC最高。熵权法和GCW法显著优于层次分析法(AHP),而ISODATA法通常优于K-Means法和自然断裂法。此外,指标对洪水风险的敏感性表明,不同地区经济、社会和环境特征的差异影响了这些指标的实际影响,导致同一指标对洪水风险的敏感性在不同地区之间存在显著差异。本研究提出的框架可用于探讨洪水风险对其他沿海城市的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Framework for predicting multi-sector business interruption losses solely from earthquake scenarios Impact of urban gray infrastructure on urban flooding: a city-scale drainage and surface water modeling framework Communicating safety: The impact of warning signs and messages on reducing risky driving in flood conditions The cost of drought: A causal study for Brazilian Municipalities Vertical vulnerability and exposure of people in the context of disaster risk at the building, city and regional level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1