Digital social innovations in rural areas – process tracing and mapping critical junctures

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103510
Carola Sommer , Tobias Chilla , Lisa Birnbaum , Stephan Kröner
{"title":"Digital social innovations in rural areas – process tracing and mapping critical junctures","authors":"Carola Sommer ,&nbsp;Tobias Chilla ,&nbsp;Lisa Birnbaum ,&nbsp;Stephan Kröner","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, digitalisation projects have helped rural areas to bridge some of the urban-rural disparities, such as accessibility issues as well as the digital literacy divide. To further exploit the potential of digitalisation for rural areas, we aim to understand the implementation of digitalisation processes and their conceptual alignment with Digital Social Innovation (DSI). As an example of Neo-Endogenous Regional Development (NERD) approaches, this perspective provides rich insights into small-scale rural adaptation in a rapidly digitising world. DSI encompasses a strong process perspective, but lacks a broader empirical application. It is a multifaceted concept that includes bottom-up participation, learning and empowerment. To operationalise the process perspective within DSI, we apply a process tracing approach within a qualitative comparative analysis of four case studies. Based on schematic mappings, we conclude with four critical junctures that provide insights for rural DSI. First, innovation can be triggered both endogenously and exogenously, with different implications for path dependencies. Second, participatory processes are crucial for digital innovation in rural communities. Third, hybridisation as an intermediate step can help to reduce the digital divide. Finally, successful institutionalisation benefits from collaborative learning. These findings outline how successful digital social innovation generates impacts beyond the project scope.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103510"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724003140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, digitalisation projects have helped rural areas to bridge some of the urban-rural disparities, such as accessibility issues as well as the digital literacy divide. To further exploit the potential of digitalisation for rural areas, we aim to understand the implementation of digitalisation processes and their conceptual alignment with Digital Social Innovation (DSI). As an example of Neo-Endogenous Regional Development (NERD) approaches, this perspective provides rich insights into small-scale rural adaptation in a rapidly digitising world. DSI encompasses a strong process perspective, but lacks a broader empirical application. It is a multifaceted concept that includes bottom-up participation, learning and empowerment. To operationalise the process perspective within DSI, we apply a process tracing approach within a qualitative comparative analysis of four case studies. Based on schematic mappings, we conclude with four critical junctures that provide insights for rural DSI. First, innovation can be triggered both endogenously and exogenously, with different implications for path dependencies. Second, participatory processes are crucial for digital innovation in rural communities. Third, hybridisation as an intermediate step can help to reduce the digital divide. Finally, successful institutionalisation benefits from collaborative learning. These findings outline how successful digital social innovation generates impacts beyond the project scope.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Digital social innovations in rural areas – process tracing and mapping critical junctures Editorial Board Post-pandemic developments in lifestyle migration in Japan: From back-to-the-land to urbanrural? Controversies over second-home development in outdoor recreation landscapes: A Norwegian case Multi-actor rural innovation ecosystems: Definition, dynamics, and spatial relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1